US row over Congressman Todd Akin's rape remark

Status
Not open for further replies.

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
So how do they explain only 5% get preg?????????????


"A woman who is raped at a vulnerable time in her menstrual cycle is as likely to conceive and retain a pregnancy as a woman who was voluntarily attempting pregnancy," said ACOG's Levy"
 

bobwg

Expert Expediter
"A woman who is raped at a vulnerable time in her menstrual cycle is as likely to conceive and retain a pregnancy as a woman who was voluntarily attempting pregnancy," said ACOG's Levy"
So the other 95% just happen to be on the wrong time of the month? on the pill? but no way that the body helped prevent the preg??? and your quote says likely does not say the body in some way could have stopped the preg
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
So the other 95% just happen to be on the wrong time of the month? on the pill? but no way that the body helped prevent the preg??? and your quote says likely does not say the body in some way could have stopped the preg

"While U.S. Rep. Todd Akin cited only "doctors" as his source of information about the rarity of pregnancy resulting from rape, it is two pages, from Mecklenburg's 1972 article, "The Indications for Induced Abortion: A Physician's Perspective," that have influenced two generations of anti-abortion-rights activists hoping to build a medical case to ban all abortions without exception"

"Leading experts on reproductive health, however, dismissed this logic.

"There are no words for this — it is just nuts," said Dr. Michael Greene, a professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology at Harvard Medical School.

Dr. David Grimes, a clinical professor in obstetrics and gynecology at the University of North Carolina, said that "to suggest that there's some biological reason why women couldn't get pregnant during a rape is absurd."

As for the contention that a rape victim's fallopian tubes tighten, Grimes said, "That's nonsense. Everything is working. The tube is very small anyway and sperm are very tiny — they're excellent swimmers."

Where Akin got the idea that rape victims rarely get pregnant | Seattle Times Newspaper
 

bobwg

Expert Expediter
Again they dont explain how 95% do not get preg so again the it just happens the victim is in the wrong time of the month? just happens to be on birth control? just happens the sperm is bad? and the experts are never wrong???
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
So how do they explain only 5% get preg?????????????
Women only ovulate for one day, while sperm remains viable for up to 72 hours. SO it's basically 1 to 2 days a month (about a day and a half, really) when a women can get pregnant. 1.5 days, divided by a 28-day cycle, yields 5%. So on any given day the chances of a woman conceiving as a result of rape is about 5%. That means that on any given day, the other 95% won't.

So the other 95% just happen to be on the wrong time of the month? on the pill?
Correct.

but no way that the body helped prevent the preg???
Absence anything other than pure theory, which is what we have, the answer would be no. The notion that the body will shut down ovulation due to some trauma is the unsubstantiated theory of one man (unsubstantiated means no verifiable or reviewable empirical evidence to back it up), and then taken as gospel by the anti-abortionists simply because it fits their beliefs and agenda. Like one doctor noted, "It's absurd".
 

asjssl

Veteran Expediter
Fleet Owner
The "legit rape" comment is strange, but he's correct that pregnancy resulting from a rape is rare, though not unheard of. He's also correct that we do not punish children for the crimes of their father's/sperm donor's; that the baby is as innocent as a baby resulting from a consensual act; that murdering that baby won't "un-rape" the victim; and that burning the baby to death in saline or ripping him or her limb-from-limb is just as unjust as the rape. No one is suggesting that the victim be made to keep and raise the baby; but murdering him or her just creates another victim, one who will never recover.

Ok..you are against abortion...how many of these UNWANTED babys are you adopting???..all i know is I remember NOTHING from being in my mothers womb... I WOULD remember being born unwanted... abused...so...unless you are throwing open your front doors for all these unwanted children....what are we to do...People are going to have unplanned pregnancy..just a fact......so how many you taking in??.. so if we cant have abortion there sure going to be ALOT of babys needing a roofs over there heads....fed......clothed.....loved......abortion is NOT nice...I agree... but if there is a question of abortion to begin with...most likely the baby cant be afforded and loved properly anyway....so you better start adopting!!




Sent from my DROID RAZR using EO Forums
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
One thing to remember about rape: it is possibly the most underreported crime [next to theft of illegal drugs, of course], so how can anyone cite facts with any accuracy?
Women have learned that reporting a rape that isn't likely to result in the attacker's arrest and conviction, for whatever reason, is an exercise in futility with humiliation, shame, and not a few nightmares thrown in.
A woman who didn't report the rape when it happened isn't likely to report it a few months later, when she discovers she's pregnant - and she's almost certain to want to abort. Forcing her to continue a pregnancy is even more barbaric than abortion, as her life is an indisputable fact.
Forcing any woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy to term is as wrong as the belief that rape causes the body to prevent conception, but some people still want to control decisions they have no right to make.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter

A woman who didn't report the rape when it happened isn't likely to report it a few months later, when she discovers she's pregnant - and she's almost certain to want to abort. Forcing her to continue a pregnancy is even more barbaric than abortion, as her life is an indisputable fact.
A false and ridiculous assertion. Nothing--nothing--is more barbaric than prenatal infantacide.
Nothing.
Forcing any woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy to term is as wrong as the belief that rape causes the body to prevent conception, but some people still want to control decisions they have no right to make.
It's not a belief; it's a known fact--that pregnancy caused by rape is rare, and that the trauma is believed to play a role in this.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Again ..... It has nothing to do with anyone but her.
That's an opinion, and a wrong one, considering there's a baby involved.
You have no idea, and can never have any idea, of what you are talking about![/QUOTE]

I'm far more knowledgeable on the subject than most. I studied it to debate those I'm favor of prenatal infantacide.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
So the sanity of a victim means nothing just disregard her well being. To be reminded every single day of your rape is no big deal.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using EO Forums

She will likely think of the rape every day for months regardless. As horrible as it is, prenatal infantacide will not un-rape her, and brings bloodguilt on both her and society.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
You're sorry for her trouble!! for her TROUBLE !!

You should try reading some of the VICTIMS testimonies ...... how they were so scared that they were going to die, how they had a knife pressed against their throat or a gun against their head, the helplessness, the sounds, the smells, the whole traumatic experience.

Just try thinking about what the victim is going through for once, but leave all your prejudices at the door first.
I'm thinking of the other victim, the one you're disregarding. If the baby could testify (and maybe on Judgment Day, he or she will) about the abortion from his or her perspective, how the scalpel shredded them, the pain he or she felt, and how he or she DID die. Try thinking about what that victim went through. Being raped, as awful as it is, beats bring dismembered alive, or burned to death with saline.
 
Last edited:

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
That's why there is such great effort to legislate the redefining of terms like "baby" and "human being" to become "at conception". It's a way to force a certain set of religious morals and beliefs onto others, against their will.

Hmmmm...sounds kind of like the debate that went on in this country regarding the personhood of blacks and Indians. Curious you regard this, then, as forcing morals and beliefs on others. It was the Church that insisted they had souls and were persons. Do you object that the Church succeeded in that, our do you object that the Church influenced society into all that "Don't murder," "Don't steal" morality?
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
no you prove it has a soul....the bible ain't proof either...neither of us can prove it...soul is the religion angle....no legal or constitutional protection for a soul....just a human being...

No, you want to kill, the onus is on YOU to prove that the homicide is justifiable.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
...I remember NOTHING from being in my mothers womb... I WOULD remember being born unwanted...
A ridiculous statement.
so if we cant have abortion there sure going to be ALOT of babys needing a roofs over there heads....fed......clothed.....loved......abortion is NOT nice...I agree... but if there is a question of abortion to begin with...most likely the baby cant be afforded and loved properly anyway....so you better start adopting!!
That's as accurate as saying nobody would appreciate a kidney or liver. Just as with transplants, there are tens of thousands, if not more, heterosexual couples begging to adopt a healthy baby. They take out ads in national newspapers even. There are enough that the babies, who don't deserve to be dismembered alive, can all be adopted and there will still be couples waiting for a baby.
Ridiculous argument destroyed.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Women only ovulate for one day, while sperm remains viable for up to 72 hours. SO it's basically 1 to 2 days a month (about
A woman is fertile for 3-5 days a month. The ovum is present and fertile for more than 1.5 days during the cycle.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
"A woman who is raped at a vulnerable time in her menstrual cycle is as likely to conceive and retain a pregnancy as a woman who was voluntarily attempting pregnancy," said ACOG's Levy"

And other studies and experts say otherwise. aamof, it's believed that women who in polygamous cultures or situations subconsciously retain or expel semen based on the suitability of the suitor.

Regardless, it's not really relevant. Abortion is murder in all circumstances, and murder is wrong.
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
That's an opinion, and a wrong one, considering there's a baby involved.
You have no idea, and can never have any idea, of what you are talking about!

I'm far more knowledgeable on the subject than most. I studied it to debate those I'm favor of prenatal infantacide.

My opinion is my opinion and therefore not wrong just as your opinion is yours.

You keep saying I am forgetting the pregnancy, when I keep saying it is the womans decision.



Have you ever been pregnant?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top