If that was the case why didn't they prosecute Hillary and why haven't they prosecuted Hunter Biden? Instead, they let her skate and they tried to set a sweetheart deal for the first son. These agencies aren't doing what needs to be done, they're administering a two-tier justice system.
OK, let's get this straight:
We need a jury of Republican billionaires who have been married 3 times, have held public office, prefer red ties, and like to play golf?
It's not a premise, it's a question. Let me be more direct. In your mind, and regarding Trump, what constitutes a jury of one's peers?
Do you think Trump should have on his jury multiple people that voted for him in the last election?
Because Hillary was smart enough to get rid of the evidence, cant convict without that. There is a case against Hunter, what the end result of that case will be is up in the air, but I believe that judge did him a favor, if it goes to trial, they will be hard pressed to get a guilty verdict. But just so you dont think I think he needs to get off without punishment, I am rooting for a guilty verdict.
I have talked before about the difference between a Trump supporter and a Trump worshipper, they need to make sure that none of his worshippers make it onto a jury. One of his supporters may be a little biased, but when presented with the evidence, they can be swayed.
Hillary didn't get rid of all the evidence, and they can prove she destroyed evidence - but Comey and the DOJ let her off the hook. In Hunter's case, they've got him dead to rights on the gun felonies and tax charges - but the new "special prosecutor" will drag his heels and do nothing. Meanwhile Congress forms more committees and makes more noise, signifying nothing.
Just to make it clear, I would love to see both of them locked up for what they did. Nobody is above the law.
I think how one voted in the last election is not a deciding factor in jury selection. As long as the jury selection process is allowed to operate as the court rules provide, I'd be fine if 100% of the jurors voted for Trump in the last election.
Per the Constitution, Trump is Disqualified From the Presidency
This is not a live question now, but it certainly will be when Trump becomes the Republican nominee and later applies for ballot access in 50 states and all U.S. territories.
Georgia indictment and post-Civil War history make it clear: Trump's actions have already disqualified him from the presidency
US law actually bars former President Donald Trump from holding office ever again. The recent Georgia indictment of Trump helps make the case.news.yahoo.com
I'm thinking if even one state deems Trump ineligible for ballot access, that will be quickly challenged in court and appealed to the US Supreme Court. The SCOTUS ruling will affect all states.
Well, Trump will not be surrendering for arrest in Fulton County, GA during the Republican debates. Instead, he'll be teaming up with Tucker Carlson to steal the spotlight from the FOX News Republican debate. That's not a bad idea as far as spotlight stealing goes, but the surrendering for arrest is better. Nevertheless, I'm sure Trump and Carlson are going to enjoy yanking FOX's chain that night.
