The Biden lawyers that found the documents didn’t have security clearances.
Correct, but they were still smart enough to realize the docs were government property and they turned them in. Even as it seems the government did not know they were missing. No requests for them had been made by the archives or DOJ.The Biden lawyers that found the documents didn’t have security clearances.
Like I said before, topics like security clearance and associated information catches my attention. I pay attention to casual blurb mentions in news stories, I've read books that discussed clearances, I had to complete training materials when I got my clearance that mentioned, specifically, as an example, the president and vice president regarding authorities, privileges, prohibitions, and routine practices.How do you know that?
While it's true that Mitch McConnell has never seen a spending bill he didn't like, the fact remains that the Democrats have had control of all three branches of govt for the past two years. We've seen how that's worked out. Also, Trump will have nothing to do with this upcoming process - he's irrelevant. Why bring him into it? McCarthy and the GOP controlled House will be the ones in the spotlight and have a chance to show us what they're made of.If the Shoe Fits ...
Legislation regarding the federal debt limit is already in the news and will dominate the headlines soon. When that debate firestorm spreads, Trump supporters and Biden critics will do well to remember that the Republicans are as good at increasing the federal debt as the Democrats.
President Trump has Signed $4.7 Trillion of Debt into Law | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
2020-01-08-Our US Budget Watch 2020 project analyzes, estimates, and explains the fiscal implications of proposals introduced during the presidential campaigns.www.crfb.org
Yes, and regarding the federal deficit, there has been movement in the right direction. On Oct 21, 2022, Biden announced: "Today, my administration announced that this year the deficit fell by $1.4 trillion — the largest one-year drop in American history — $1.4 trillion decline in the deficit." (Source)While it's true that Mitch McConnell has never seen a spending bill he didn't like, the fact remains that the Democrats have had control of all three branches of govt for the past two years.
Yes we have. See above.We've seen how that's worked out.
Correct. I bring him into it only to show that the deficit increased nearly $5 trillion under his Republican administration; only to show that the Republicans lack the standing to blame the Democrats alone for the deficit insanity that prevails today.Also, Trump will have nothing to do with this upcoming process - he's irrelevant. Why bring him into it?
Yep, and the early indications are not encouraging if it matters to you that the US credit rating remains strong. If we default on government bond payments, the global financial markets will panic and a lot of otherwise avoidable harm will come to institutions and individual citizens alike.McCarthy and the GOP controlled House will be the ones in the spotlight and have a chance to show us what they're made of.
Which they will undoubtedly deny.;only to show that the Republicans lack the standing to blame the Democrats alone for the deficit insanity that prevails today.
Not the first time Democrats and Biden have taken credit for the drawdown of govt emergency spending for Covid relief. He also confuses govt debt with deficit - they're not the same. The use of Joe Biden remarks as a fact source is usually not a good idea.Yes, and regarding the federal deficit, there has been movement in the right direction. On Oct 21, 2022, Biden announced: "Today, my administration announced that this year the deficit fell by $1.4 trillion — the largest one-year drop in American history — $1.4 trillion decline in the deficit." (Source)
I was deeply involved in the Perot campaign at the state level. His reasons for dropping out are not even close to what you suggest.Ross Perot dropped out in 1992 mainly because he saw that the Democratic Party was unifying around Bill Clinton and likely going to win.
My point remains valid. The people were demanding fiscal responsibility and a divided government responded.Clinton ran on a theme of helping the “middle class” and giving them a tax cut. But he didn’t follow through with that agenda and instead soon after getting elected heeded to his Democratic controlled Congress’s desire to increase spending. It wasn’t until the Republican “revolution” of 1994 and them taking control of the House in a long while that changed the direction. Bill Clinton realized that if he didn’t work with the Republicans (balanced budget among other things) that he would soon be next to be voted out of office. It was more about his political survival at that point.
Funny in what way? Did Trump maintain visitor logs at Mar-a-Lago? Has any president maintained visitor logs at his home?Too funny:
No visitor logs exist for Biden's Wilmington home, site of classified doc discovery, WH Counsel's Office says
No visitor logs exist for President Biden's Wilmington home, the White House Counsel's Office said Monday of the residence where Biden kept classified documents.www.foxnews.com
The politicians panicked when facing covid and their solution was to shower people with free money. Today's inflation (weakening dollar) is partially a result of that. I believe the US dollar will be the next bubble to burst, shattering the world economy, but also clearing the way for a new, international reserve currency to rise that can bring more benefits to people worldwide than the present system which brings benefits mostly to the rich."As policymakers enacted emergency measures to combat the COVID-19 crisis, federal budget deficits ballooned to levels not seen since World War II. Although the deficit has reverted to pre-pandemic levels as the United States winds down pandemic spending, deficits are projected to grow significantly over the coming decades—an ominous trend that will put increased strain on the federal budget..."
If there's a shutdown, the US government will not default on its bond payments - period. The govt would continue to take in taxes and other revenues that would cover this debt, and it has the ability to "print money" thanks to Nixon's abolishment of the gold standard.Yep, and the early indications are not encouraging if it matters to you that the US credit rating remains strong. If we default on government bond payments, the global financial markets will panic and a lot of otherwise avoidable harm will come to institutions and individual citizens alike.
It seems like the Democrat party uses this scare tactic every election cycle, and it's pure malarkey. Unfortunately, it's encouraged by the mainstream media and the general public doesn't understand that govt shutdowns primarily effect non-essential services and their employees who still end up getting paid for any time they may miss during the shutdown.At the grass roots level, I cannot think of a more effective, immediate, and lasting way for a party to alienate itself from the voters than to prompt, in a way that is directly attributable to that party, a default on people's social security, student financial aid, and medical disability payments.
A shutdown and a default are two different things. One does not imply the other. A recent change is "tough talk" from some Republicans about a willingness to default. Democrats are not threatening a default. Some Republicans are.If there's a shutdown, the US government will not default on its bond payments - period.
That's part of the story but not all of it. You left out the part where Perot reentered the race.It was publicly stated by him and in the news at the time the reason I stated. Maybe someone was out of the loop on what was going on. See article and excerpts below.
View attachment 22198View attachment 22199View attachment 22200