Idiots like this need to be disbarred.
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
To many prosecutors are Democrat and weak....I certainly am not claiming that.
Those are explanations for why video (such as you imagine may exist) may not actually exist to much extent, at least in any useable form.
Not excuses.
Wait ... who was President when that occurred ?
Are you saying Trump is part of the Left ... because cases weren't brought and rioters weren't prosecuted on his watch ?
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
Yes the attorney general is in the process of doing his job and looking at the evidence and planning on charges being brought.Any updates on that AZ audit ?
Woooo-hoo !!!
I think it's pretty funny that the problem you seem to be having with federal law enforcement is that they aren't charging the Jan 6th domestic terrorists/insurrectionists ... fast enough ...
I'd say it's a fair bet, that Mr. Epps is probably a Trumper ... so if that is in fact true, then all this speculation on the extreme Right amounts to eating their own.
No, instead there is a curious selective charging process that hasn’t even charged the low hanging fruit perpetrators such as Epps, the guy removing the restricted signs and fencing so people won’t see it, and the fellow with a bullhorn on the scaffold imploring people to go into the capitol. Obvious ones that have good pictures of them too to identify them, not grainy video or taken with low lighting. Easy layup arrests for actions that they did that day, yet 11 months later still no arrests. Meanwhile some others who did nothing but stand in a “restricted” zone have been charged. Interesting indeed. But Revolver is on it and people are getting informed.
Last edited:
Doesn’t matter. Dems are looking to broom Biden out stat and also impending doom from close to 100 seat blowout.Any updates on that AZ audit ?
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
He's facing his own ethics investigation by the State Bar of Arizona ... which could ultimately affect his legal and professional standing.
And that doesn't even count running afoul of the Feds and the DOJ if he starts trying to screw around with election results.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Until they have finished investigating the entire matter and finished charging everyone they're gonna charge, you can't really argue that they have selectively charged some and not others ... because they aren't finished with the entire process.
Charges continue to filed, arrests continue to be made ... just about every week.
Now you might quibble with how they are going about their task, and who they choose to charge before others, but you really don't have any insight into what actually goes into those decisions.
I suspect some of it a manpower issue (finite resources) ... but that's not to say that there aren't other factors involved as well.
After all, it is the largest, most complex criminal investigation and prosecution in the nation's history.
You might want to read the following which goes into the reasoning (strategy) that may be being used in how this investigation and prosecution is being pursued:
A TAXONOMY OF THE [VISIBLE] JANUARY 6 “CRIME SCENE” INVESTIGATION
ROTFLMAO ... sure.
The crack anonymous legal/investigative team over at Revolver is all over it.
Given the loaded and emotional language that they use it's fairly easy to see why it appeals so much to diehard Trumpers.
Last edited:
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
If any Dems actually are, they're going to have to work awfully hard to convince the other roughly 80 or so percent of Dems that approve of the job he's doing ...
A loss of seats by the President's party in the mid-terms isn't at all unusual, but there have been some exceptions.
OTOH, November 2022 is still quite aways away.
They want him replaced except all the alternatives are even less popular.If any Dems actually are, they're going to have to work awfully hard to convince the other roughly 80 or so percent of Dems that approve of the job he's doing ...
A loss of seats by the President's party in the mid-terms isn't at all unusual, but there have been some exceptions.
OTOH, November 2022 is still quite aways away.
And Biden is gushing support with independents. Dems will be the last to jump ship from his horrific job performance.
Implosion pending.
Those are just a laundry list of excuses. The individuals that were highlighted in the article, it’s very plausible to conclude that they’re being shielded from prosecution.Until they have finished investigating the entire matter and finished charging everyone they're gonna charge, you can't really argue that they have selectively charged some and not others ... because they aren't finished with the entire process.
Charges continue to filed, arrests continue to be made ... just about every week.
Now you might quibble with how they are going about their task, and who they choose to charge before others, but you really don't have any insight into what actually goes into those decisions.
I suspect some of it a manpower issue (finite resources) ... but that's not to say that there aren't other factors involved as well.
After all, it is the largest, most complex criminal investigation and prosecution in the nation's history.
You might want to read the following which goes into the reasoning (strategy) that may be being used in how this investigation and prosecution is being pursued:
A TAXONOMY OF THE [VISIBLE] JANUARY 6 “CRIME SCENE” INVESTIGATION
ROTFLMAO ... sure.
The crack anonymous legal/investigative team over at Revolver is all over it.
Given the loaded and emotional language that they use it's fairly easy to see why it appeals so much to diehard Trumpers.
The reason for that was also fleshed out in the article. If that is the case then many that were charged likely would have an excellent entrapment case. As the article mentioned, Epps should just come clean in what he knows.
Last edited:
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
The election board wiped the server BEFORE handing it over to be inspected which is evidence tampering.....which also pissed off the judge that ordered them to hand it over.He's facing his own ethics investigation by the State Bar of Arizona ... which could ultimately affect his legal and professional standing.
And that doesn't even count running afoul of the Feds and the DOJ if he starts trying to screw around with election results.
Alot of the vote count list did not match what was in the boxes and they found that some people had voted up to 3 or 4 times.
And alot of votes did not pass or should not have past the verification process because of no signature on the ballot (230k found).
But oh there is no fraud...yea right I do not believe a word from a Democrat.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
The last Gallup poll showed Biden's approval rating with Independents is actually rising.
Maybe Trafalgar has something different ?
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Nope - they are simply a list of possible reasons which are plausible.
The list was not intended to be all-inclusive and there may well be other reasons unknown to me which are also plausible.
Just like an anecdotal survey of political yard signs is a plausible indicator of who's going to win an election right ?
So should a lot of people connected with the events of Jan 6th 2020 ... particularly if they are under subpoena from a Congressional Committee.
The position calling for transparency from Epps would likely be a lot more credible if those calling for it were being consistent with regard to all the players involved.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
You talking Maricopa County Right ?
Was the Maricopa County Database ‘Wiped’ Before the Cyber Ninjas Audit?
FACT CHECK: DID MARICOPA COUNTY DELETE ALL OF ITS 2020 ELECTION RESULTS?
How's things seem for Judge "Imma Big Mad" these days ?
He sanction anyone for (supposedly) not complying with his orders ?
Anything on the docket in his court on all this ?
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
You knew it was only a matter of time because there had to be a Jim Bob in that crowd ... but they finally got him:
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
The boxes of votes and the tally papers that were in the boxes did not match in many boxes.
People did vote multiple times....they found over 3k had done so.
The boxes of mail in votes that had missing votes seams suspicious to the attorney general.
People did vote multiple times....they found over 3k had done so.
The boxes of mail in votes that had missing votes seams suspicious to the attorney general.
Amazing isn't it?Where do you come up with this stuff ?
Steve Bannon's War Room ?
Some seem disinterested in knowing about him and others such as scaffold bullhorn guy and restricted signs and fence guy. Instead they want to go down rabbit holes about some that legally organized a speech.Nope - they are simply a list of possible reasons which are plausible.
The list was not intended to be all-inclusive and there may well be other reasons unknown to me which are also plausible.
Just like an anecdotal survey of political yard signs is a plausible indicator of who's going to win an election right ?
So should a lot of people connected with the events of Jan 6th 2020 ... particularly if they are under subpoena from a Congressional Committee.
The position calling for transparency from Epps would likely be a lot more credible if those calling for it were being consistent with regard to all the players involved.
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
And the Democrats are after general Flynn again over jan 6th....
They are over reaching with this as he was not there nor did he organize anything with it.
They are over reaching with this as he was not there nor did he organize anything with it.