The Trump Card...

muttly · Dec 22, 2021

danthewolf00 said:
And the Democrats are after general Flynn again over jan 6th....
They are over reaching with this as he was not there nor did he organize anything with it.

They’re perpetually concocting imaginary crimes.

RLENT · Dec 22, 2021

Ragman said:
Amazing isn't it?

Utterly.

RLENT · Dec 22, 2021

danthewolf00 said:
The boxes of votes and the tally papers that were in the boxes did not match in many boxes.
People did vote multiple times....they found over 3k had done so.
The boxes of mail in votes that had missing votes seams suspicious to the attorney general.

So nothing on Judge "Imma Big Mad" then ?

Sure doesn't seem like he's all that pissed ...

BTW - that Arizona AG has multiple ethics investigations going on apparently:

Regents file bar complaint against Brnovich

RLENT · Dec 22, 2021

danthewolf00 said:
And the Democrats are after general Flynn again over jan 6th....
They are over reaching with this as he was not there nor did he organize anything with it.

How would you know ?

RLENT · Dec 22, 2021

muttly said:
Some seem disinterested in knowing about him and others such as scaffold bullhorn guy and restricted signs and fence guy.

And who might they be ?

muttly said:
Instead they want to go down rabbit holes about some that legally organized a speech.

I think folks in federal law enforcement and on the Jan 6 Committee are much more interested in who organized/incited the attempted (but failed) insurrection and the riot that resulted from that.

muttly · Dec 22, 2021

RLENT said:
And who might they be ?

I think folks in federal law enforcement and on the Jan 6 Committee are much more interested in who organized/incited the attempted (but failed) insurrection and the riot that resulted from that.

Well there is the guy on the scaffold yelling to people to fill up the capitol, Epps, who was doing the same, the fellow tearing down the restricted area signs and fencing so people wouldn’t know that they were in one, and oh, the other guy that either was an officer or impersonating one, who was waving people into the restricted zone. He hasn’t been indentified yet as well.

danthewolf00 · Dec 22, 2021

RLENT said:
And who might they be ?

I think folks in federal law enforcement and on the Jan 6 Committee are much more interested in who organized/incited the attempted (but failed) insurrection and the riot that resulted from that.

Yea right they over reach on Flynn and mark meadows.

RLENT · Dec 22, 2021

muttly said:
Well there is the guy on the scaffold yelling to people to fill up the capitol, Epps, who was doing the same, the fellow tearing down the restricted area signs and fencing so people wouldn’t know that they were in one, and oh, the other guy that either was an officer or impersonating one, who was waving people into the restricted zone. He hasn’t been indentified yet as well.

You misunderstood my question:

I wasn't asking who are the individuals were that you think other folks ought to be interested in ... I was asking who are the folks that you think are disinterested in knowing who those folks are.

muttly · Dec 22, 2021

RLENT said:
You misunderstood my question:

I wasn't asking who are the individuals were that you think other folks ought to be interested in ... I was asking who are the folks that you think are disinterested in knowing who those folks are.

YOU

RLENT · Dec 22, 2021

danthewolf00 said:
Yea right they over reach on Flynn and mark meadows.

Looks the Committee wasn't the one with the overreach but rather it was Flynn.

His lawsuit against the Committee was tossed one day after it was filed:

Judge denies Michael Flynn's request for restraining order against Jan. 6 committee

And adding a little insult to the injury, the judge that tossed it noted there were errors in how his lawyers filed it.

That seems to actually be a thing with these legal yokels from the MAGAverse ...

RLENT · Dec 22, 2021

muttly said:
YOU

Oh.

Well, I am interested.

But my interest - unlike some folks perhaps - is not motivated by seeking to distract from what the FBI/DOJ and the Committee are doing.

muttly · Dec 23, 2021

RLENT said:
Oh.

Well, I am interested.

But my interest - unlike some folks perhaps - is not motivated by seeking to distract from what the FBI/DOJ and the Committee are doing.

What the committee is doing is a distraction. Because they’re not investigating why Ashli Babbitt was shot or about the people that facilitated the escalation of the protest/ gathering into a riot.

skyraider · Dec 23, 2021

He should have worn a coat and tie....then he would have been one of the normal looking bunch..

muttly · Dec 23, 2021

skyraider said:
He should have worn a coat and tie....then he would have been one of the normal looking bunch..

View attachment 21017

What was his crime again that deserved 41 months?

skyraider · Dec 23, 2021

muttly said:
What was his crime again that deserved 41 months?

Its all just a witch hunt imho

RLENT · Dec 23, 2021

muttly said:
What the committee is doing is a distraction.

I disagree - the Committee is doing precisely what it was formed and chartered to do ... which is, I suspect, exactly some people's problem with it.

muttly said:
Because they’re not investigating why Ashli Babbitt was shot or about the people that facilitated the escalation of the protest/ gathering into a riot.

The Committee doesn't exist to serve or forward Trumper narratives and/or minimize and whitewash the culpability of the parties responsible for causing the domestic terror attack on our government and the US Capitol.

The Committee has very specific, but wide-ranging, purposes:

(1) To investigate and report upon the facts, circumstances, and causes relating to the January 6, 2021, domestic terrorist attack upon the United States Capitol Complex (hereafter referred to as the “domestic terrorist attack on the Capitol”) and relating to the interference with the peaceful transfer of power, including facts and causes relating to the preparedness and response of the United States Capitol Police and other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the National Capital Region and other instrumentalities of government, as well as the influencing factors that fomented such an attack on American representative democracy while engaged in a constitutional process.

(2) To examine and evaluate evidence developed by relevant Federal, State, and local governmental agencies regarding the facts and circumstances surrounding the domestic terrorist attack on the Capitol and targeted violence and domestic terrorism relevant to such terrorist attack.

(3) To build upon the investigations of other entities and avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts by reviewing the investigations, findings, conclusions, and recommendations of other executive branch, congressional, or independent bipartisan or nonpartisan commission investigations into the domestic terrorist attack on the Capitol, including investigations into influencing factors related to such attack.

About | Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

RLENT · Dec 23, 2021

muttly said:
What was his crime again that deserved 41 months?

Obstructing a proceeding of Congress.

His sentence was on the low end of the federal sentencing guidelines for that offense.

He pled guilty and accepted responsibility for his actions that day.

RLENT · Dec 23, 2021

skyraider said:
He should have worn a coat and tie....then he would have been one of the normal looking bunch..

He should have not gone in the Capitol and obstructed a proceeding of Congress.

muttly · Dec 23, 2021

RLENT said:
Obstructing a proceeding of Congress.

His sentence was on the low end of the federal sentencing guidelines for that offense.

He pled guilty and accepted responsibility for his actions that day.

Dude, he was herded into the building by scaffold guy with the bullhorn. What is this fellow’s name and why hasn’t he been arrested? Do you have information on this guy who he is?

RLENT · Dec 23, 2021

muttly said:
Dude, he was herded into the building by scaffold guy with the bullhorn.

Dude, Jacob Chansley didn't have a gun put to his head - at least so far as we know - to make him walk into the Capitol.

He chose to ... and went of his own free will.

muttly said:
What is this fellow’s name and why hasn’t he been arrested?

No idea.

But I do know there have been cases where Jan 6th domestic terrorists have been charged under court seal ... and the cases are not unsealed until months afterwards.

It's not at all uncommon.