I was not aware of that information until you posted it. Looking into it, I found the rest of the story (link below).
I'll add that any crime committed by any person, be they a state representative or ordinary citizen, should be charged and heard in a court of law. That's exactly what happened in this case. One charge was dismissed in court because the burden of proof was not met. Other charges were not prosecuted by prosecutors for reasons unknown (but I suspect it was because there was insufficient evidence, other evidence was not known at the time, or the alleged crimes were not committed at all).
That does not let Jones off the hook. If evidence is now available that was not previously available, Jones should be charged for that crime(s). Better still, if crimes were actually committed Jones would do well to confess, plead guilty, apologize, express remorse, and accept the consequences.
While it is certain Jones' critics will use this information to make it about the person, that shifts the topic off what I think is the more important issue.
Even if Jones is a dirtbag of the worst kind, he remains eligible to run for and be elected to public office. The people's election choices matter. As long as Jones is not convicted of any disqualifying crimes, it would be an abuse of power for a party to expel the voters' properly elected representative from his state house seat.
To me, it is troubling to see the reports and videos you point to. I do not condone that behavior by Jones, and any crimes he committed should be charged and brought to trial. Once there, I'm willing to abide by the decision of the court and/or jury. They are there. They are privy to all the information. They are considering it in a forum that is fair to both sides.
While Jones's 2020 behavior is troubling, if he was found guilty of disqualifying crimes, it would not trouble me in the least to see him expelled from his seat for that reason.
Regardless, this information will taint Jone's reputation. It's not a good look, just like it's not a good look to be a presidential candidate whose company has been convicted of tax fraud. It will be interesting to see if this weakens Jones' standing with the voters and if an opposition candidate surfaces in the upcoming special election.
Believing the Justin Jones expulsion to be an unjust act (the punishment was out of proportion to the offense) and an abuse of power by the Republican supermajority, I consider it a victory for democracy that he was reappointed. But I don't care if he is reelected or someone else. in the upcoming special election. For me, it's not about the person who fills that seat. It's about the integrity of the process by which that seat is filled and allowed to remain filled.
Another item of interest will be to see if the Jones invitation to visit the White House still stands now that this information has come to light. Biden may decide it is not a good look to host someone at the White House who is on video using a traffic cone as a weapon. That video will get nationwide air time if Jones shows up in Washington. The media will love the drama, which will overshadow every other thing Biden hoped to accomplish by inviting Jones for a visit. And it will put Biden in a difficult spot trying to explain away the traffic cone incident.
Jones was charged with assaulting a Tennessee Highway Patrol trooper on July 11, 2020.
www.wsmv.com