Quite a few books have been written about this complicated subject, so I'm not going to put up a novella-length post that nobody would read.
You are a reasonable and rational poster in this forum. I would read any long post you put up.
t could be said that this trend actually started in the mid-sixties with LBJ's Great Society program. But I personally believe that the more recent divisions started with Barack Hussein Obama's promise in 2008 to "fundamentally transform America".
I put the start date around Nixon and the Watergate episode. That was the point, I think, where the Greatest Generation and subsequent generations registered an increased distrust of government. When it became widely known that the president was a crook, concepts like duty, honor and country began to decline.
Since then the Democrat party has drifted so far left that is borders on outright Socialism, and they've received near unanimous support from the mainstream media.
Is Fox News, Wall Street Journal and other conservative outlets not mainstream media too? It's not like the Democrats have their media and the conservatives have none.
This has filtered down to the Govt funded public education system which indoctrinates our children, and Universities that perpetuate the process.
Publicly funded education has been a feature of America for a very long time. And it has always indoctrinated America's children. That's part of what it is designed to do. When I was a child, I was indoctrinated to pledge allegiance to the flag, vote, have a basic grasp on how government works, obey the law, obey the rules, respect my elders, respect authority, etc. I came out of school a shining, church-going patriot, eager to join the Army and serve in Viet Nam. (I volunteered 5 times to go to Viet Nam but the war was winding down at that time and my applications were denied). I was as indoctrinated as they come.
My enthusiasm died twice. Once when I saw our president breaking the law. And a second time when I heard from my combat veteran friends what really went on in Viet Nam and I watched their patriotism fade too. No longer were we willing to take the government at its word.
Government programs were put in place to further the cause, and we now know that Reagan was right when he said they have "everlasting life".
Government programs like the GI Bill which paid for my college education and housing programs that would have helped me buy a house had I bought one. And yes, they do indeed have everlasting life. It is nearly impossible to kill a program once it's started. That's because every program grows its citizen constituency and government employees (often union) who are highly skilled at keeping such programs alive, not for the benefit of the country but for their own self interests.
Republicans have contributed to this process by compromising and encouraging "moderation" rather than standing firm for basic constitutional rights, religion, patriotism and traditional family values.
Patriotism is not automatic. The government must be worthy of it. But another reason respect for the constitution and the government has declined is because basic civics and the empowering message that your citizen voice and vote matters. Kennedy said "Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country." We don't hear that message from political leaders any more. Now we hear, "Elect me because I know how to use the system to funnel benefits to you that are paid for by others." And the citizens do just that.
About family values, that too is a complex topic but don't omit technology as a major factor in that change. The birth control pill and the automobile, which women were only later allowed to drive, fundamentally altered much of what society believes, because so much more is possible thanks to technology.
Today, a woman can earn a living on her own, if that's what she chooses to do and there is no social stigma around an unmarried woman like there used to be. Much of that is possible because of technology.
Technology has changed the way we communicate and receive news also. I fondly remember Walter Conkite and Huntly-Brinkly. As the newsboy, I brought people their newspaper once a day. The local paper was an item of great interest. Now, with the internet and social media, people think more about being on the right side with their Facebook tribe than they think about what actually happened, and what might have actually happened at the city council meeting, had that person attended.
Off now to read the article you shared.
But first, let me say, I don't like how America is today. I don't like everyone always blaming the other side. I miss the days where people wondered first if you were a good person before they wondered if you were part of the left or right.
The article quoted and linked below was written in 2012, and describes the "design" far better than I can. The author turned out to be far more prescient than even he might have imagined.
"Unfortunately, his October 30, 2008 promise to set about "fundamentally transforming the United States of America" is one he has kept. If he is reelected on November 6, 2012, I believe that the transformation from the free republic we have cherished will be irreversible and permanent. And that the country will then be hopelessly on the road to fiscal, social, and political collapse...
He will fundamentally transform America from a society that strives, however imperfectly, for a color-blind equality to one where race matters in everything from enforcement of voter protection laws, to college admissions, to hiring, to school grades and discipline."
As president, Barack Obama has cynically broken promise after promise, often enough that it's hard to believe that his cognitive functioning is so impaired that he ever thought he could keep most of them. He wouldn't, of course, be the o...
www.americanthinker.com