That's correct ... both as to my doing it and it being a fact.
But I didn't then just go all stoopid and call impeaching a former governmental official a clown move.
You spelled ACQUITTED wrong.
That's correct ... both as to my doing it and it being a fact.
But I didn't then just go all stoopid and call impeaching a former governmental official a clown move.
Accountable in what way? He was out of office.
According to the House practice manual, "Impeachment is a constitutional remedy to address serious offenses against the system of government. It is the first step in a remedial process—that of removal from public office and possible disqualification from holding further office. The purpose of impeachment is not punishment; rather, its function is primarily to maintain constitutional government."
The Constitution provides that "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."
You spelled ACQUITTED wrong.
A president making sure our elections were done legal and secure certainly falls within the “outer perimeter”
View attachment 23461
And they voted for Acquittal. Thanks for playing.You really don't understand how any of this is supposed to work do you ?
Impeachment
What do you divine from all that ... in your own words ?
No, that’s not what happened. Try listening to the full phone call( for context) instead of edited little snippets from “news” operations that spoon-feed their viewers.He was lobbying to change the valid results of a legitimate election.
And he got caught while doing so !
And they voted for Acquittal.
Thanks for playing.
No, that’s not what happened.
Try listening to the full phone call( for context) instead of edited little snippets from “news” operations that spoon-feed their viewers.
View attachment 23462View attachment 23463Report: Raffensperger Testimony Supports Trump Defense in Georgia Case
Brad Raffensperger reportedly contradicted claims that Trump insisted he violate his oath of office by fabricating votes to win the state.www.breitbart.com
By failing epically to convict Trump, the Left moved on from “up for grabs” to “grabbing at straws”.
View attachment 23464
Turdley - who is a clown - is not a reliable narrator.
And Breitbart isn't a reliable source ...
Of course not.Trump Consultant: No Widespread Voter Fraud Found
Facts matter, but will they matter to MAGA? It seems not.
Now do the Russia collusion pee tape hoax or the Hunter laptop was Russia disinformation lie that the Left bought hook, line, and sinker.Of course not.
Why should they care about the truth now?