The Trump Card...

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Questions Answered in Court; Week of 8/27/23

Running Total

*Trump-Favorable Answers: 4
Trump-Adverse Answers: 112
Trump Win Rate: 3.57%

Answered This Week:

Yes, the DOJ request to bar Trump from being deposed in lawsuits brought by former FBI agents Strzok and Page (because he was president) is denied. 9/1/23, DC Appeals Court

Yes, Trump’s federal election interference trial date is set for March 4, 2024. 8/29/23, Chutkan

No, the Trump legal team may not file amicus briefs in this criminal case. 8/29/23, Chutkan

Yes, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the Trump legal team is denied. 8/29/23, Chutkan

Yes, the motion to intervene submitted by the Trump legal team is denied. 8/29/23, Chutkan

Answered in Previous Weeks:
No, 62 lawsuits filed by Trump making various 2020 election claims are not valid. 11/20 - 1/21, Judges in 62 courts
No, Meadows and other Trump aids cannot assert executive privilege to avoid testifying before the Jan. 6 Committee. 3/8/22, Chutkan
No, Mike Pence does not have executive privilege to avoid testifying before the Jan. 6 Committee. 3/8/22, Boasberg
No, former national security advisor Robert O’Brien cannot assert executive privilege to avoid testifying before the Jan. 6 Committee. 4/21/22, Jackson
No, former White House Counsel Cipollone cannot claim executive privilege to avoid testifying before the grand jury. 7/1/22, Chutkan.
Yes, NY AG James will sue the Trump Organization claiming $250 million in fraud. 9/21/22
Yes, an independent monitor is appointed to thwart Trump's attempt to move his business legal structure out of New York jurisdiction. 11/14/22
No, Judge Cannon does not have jurisdiction to appoint a special master. Cannon's ruling is reversed. 12/1/22, 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
No, special rules cannot be written by Judge Cannon for Trump because he is a former president. 12/1/22, 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Yes, Trump's lawsuit challenging the Mar-a-Lago search will be dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction. 12/12/22, Cannon
Yes, the Trump Organization is guilty of 17 counts of tax fraud. 12/6/22, Jury
No, the NY AG lawsuit will not be dismissed. 1/6/23, Engoron
Yes, Trump is ordered to pay $938,000 in legal fees to Hillary and others, because Trump abused the legal system. 1/19/23, Middlebrooks
Yes, Trump attorney Corcoran must testify because attorney client privilege does not apply (furtherance of a crime). 3/17/23,Howell
No, the NY AG lawsuit against Trump et al will not be delayed. 3/21/23 Engoron
No, John Eastman does not have executive privilege to withhold documents from the Jan. 6 Committee3/28/23, Carter
Yes, the 2019 Carroll lawsuit can be amended to include Trump's CNN remarks. 6/13/23, Kaplan
*Yes, the scope of the lawsuit brought by NY AG James is limited by the statute of limitations, and Ivanka Trump is thereby dismissed from the suit. 6/27/23, New York Appellate Division
No, Trump is not immune from defamation charges because he was president. 6/29/23, Kaplan
No, Fani Willis will not be disqualified from working on the GA election interference case. GA Supreme Court, 7/17/23
No, the GA Special Grand Jury report will not be thrown out. 7/17/23, GA Supreme Court
Yes, Trump is a rapist. 7/19/23, Kaplan
Yes, the $5 million in damages the jury said Trump must pay Carroll is reasonable. 7/19/23, Kaplan
No, the falsified records case will not be moved to federal court. 7/19/23, Hellerstein
Yes, Cohen and Trump will settle Cohen's lawsuit claiming millions in unpaid legal fees. 7/21/23
No, the documents trial will not be postponed until after the election. 7/21/23, Cannon
Yes, the defamation lawsuit Trump filed against CNN is dismissed because the judge rules it is "not actionable." 7/28/23, Singhal
*Yes, Trump is protected by presidential immunity regarding two defamatory statements he made against a PA voting machine supervisor when Trump was president. 7/31/23, Erdos
No, Trump is not protected by presidential immunity regarding one defamatory statement he made against a PA voting machine supervisor after Trump left office. 7/31/23
Yes, the GA Special Grand Jury report can be used against Trump. 7/31
No, Fani Willis will not be disqualified from prosecuting Trump. 7/31
Yes, Trump will be deposed under oath regarding the $500 million lawsuit he filed against Cohen. 7/31/23
Yes, the Miami grand jury will continue its investigation and produce additional indictments, even after it first indicted Trump. 8/1/23
Yes, Trump will be indicted on charges concerning the 2020 election. 8/3/23
Yes, the Trump deposition transcript from the Carroll trial will be given to DA Bragg. 8/3/23
No, Trump's request for a delayed response to DOJ's protective order motion will not be granted. 8/5/23
Yes, Trump’s counter-defamation suit against E. Jean Carroll is without merit and is dismissed 8/7/23, Kaplan
*No, the Special Counsel may not file under seal evidence of conflicts RE attorney Woodward. 8/7/23, Cannon
Yes, the DOJ can have its requested Garcia hearing regarding Woodward conflicts. 8/7/23, Cannon
No, the protective order hearing date will not be delayed. 8/8/23, Chutkan
Yes, Trump is prohibited from making inflammatory statements about the election interference case. 8/11/23, Chutkan
*No, the protective order will not be as broad as DOJ requests. 8/11/23, Chutkan
No, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Merchan will not recuse himself from the Manhattan falsified business records case. 8/14/23
Yes, Trump (and 18 co-defendants) will be indicted by a Fulton County grand jury on RICO and other charges. 8/15/23
Yes, the appeal Trump filed RE Carroll is frivolous and is denied for that reason. 8/18/23, Kaplan
No, the second Carroll defamation trial scheduled for 1/15/24 will not be delayed. 8/18/23, Kaplan
No, the May, 2024 Mar-a-Lago documents trial date will not be changed to a later date. 8/21/23, Cannon
Yes, Trump will have bail conditions and a $200,000 bond in GA. 8/21/23, McAfee
No, the GA RICO case will not be delayed while Trump aids seek its removal to federal court. 8/23/23, Jones

Disclaimer: This ongoing compilation is done on a best-efforts basis. If I miss or get something wrong, kindly advise me and I'll correct the list. Where a question has been appealed to a higher court, the higher court's answer is shown and the lower court's answer previously shown is removed from the list. Where an appeal is pending, the lower court's action remains on the list until the appeal is com
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLENT

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Here is another account of this matter. This one makes it quite clear that the judge removed Griffin from office, not because of a misdemeanor, but because he aided the insurrection.

"Griffin was previously convicted in federal court of a misdemeanor for entering Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, without going inside the building. He was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.

"The new ruling immediately removes Griffin from his position as a commissioner in Otero County in southern New Mexico.
'Mr. Griffin aided the insurrection even though he did not personally engage in violence,' Mathew wrote. 'By joining the mob and trespassing on restricted Capitol grounds, Mr. Griffin contributed to delaying Congress’s election-certification proceedings.'”


I wonder if Griffin will appeal this ruling; the fact that he represented himself in this proceeding probably indicates he has neither the means nor the will to do so. Regardless, a decision by this District County Judge against a defendant for participating in an "insurrection" that has not elsewhere been proven to exist means nothing to the bigger picture. Note that a federal court declined to take the case.

However, the fact that the three plaintiffs were "aided" by CREW (a Washington liberal watchdog group), NAACP and Common Cause shows desperation from the Left that they would attack a county commissioner in rural New Mexico (Otero county pop. 67,000) with the aid of a liberal judge willing to declare on his own that Jan 6 was an "insurrection" so the 14th amendment could be invoked. Sadly, CREW and other groups like them will likely sniff out other cases like this in their pursuit of political persecution. Maybe there's a conservative group that will help Griffin appeal this decision to set the record straight.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RLENT and Ragman

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
I wonder if Griffin will appeal this ruling; the fact that he represented himself in this proceeding probably indicates he has neither the means nor the will to do so. Regardless, a decision by this District County Judge against a defendant for participating in an "insurrection" that has not elsewhere been proven to exist means nothing to the bigger picture. Note that a federal court declined to take the case.

However, the fact that the three plaintiffs were "aided" by CREW (a Washington liberal watchdog group), NAACP and Common Cause shows desperation from the Left that they would attack a county commissioner in rural New Mexico (Otero county pop. 67,000) with the aid of a liberal judge willing to declare on his own that Jan 6 was an "insurrection" so the 14th amendment could be invoked. Sadly, CREW and other groups like them will likely sniff out other cases like this in their pursuit of political persecution. Maybe there's a conservative group that will help Griffin appeal this decision to set the record straight.
You are assuming that a conviction for insurrection or other qualifying crime named in the 14th Amendment, Section 3 is required to disqualify. I'm not sure that assumption is accurate.

Your post prompted me to look a little deeper and actually read parts of the 126-page academic paper written by conservative constitutional scholars Baude and Paulsen. They said:

"What actions count as having “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the Constitution of the United States or having “given aid or comfort or the enemies thereof”? (p. 5)

"We come at last to the heart of the beast: the substance of Section Three’s prohibition. We begin (in Subpart A) with the most interesting and important set of issues—the types of misconduct that trigger Section Three. What deeds (and words?) amount to having 'engaged in' 'insurrection” or “rebellion' against the lawful authority of the Constitution and the system of government it establishes? What acts (or words?) amount to having given 'aid or comfort' to 'enemies' of lawful government under the Constitution?" (p. 62)


"... it is plain that Section Three requires no prior criminal-law conviction, for treason or any other defined crime, as a prerequisite for its disqualification to apply." (p. 68) (Emphasis mine)

We'll learn more as this morphs into a lawsuit or suits that make their way to the US Supreme Court.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ragman and RLENT

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
A (slightly belated) #FAFO Friday to all who celebrate ... ;)

This week saw (at least) FOUR anti-American MAGAt domestic terrorists sentenced for their parts in the January 6th insurrection:

On Thursday we had two:

Proud Boys seditious conspiracy defendant Zach Rehl - 15 years

Proud Boys seditious conspiracy defendant Joe Biggs - 17 years

Friday saw another two:

Proud Boy Domenic Pezzola (not convicted of seditious conspiracy) - 10 years

Proud Boy seditious conspiracy defendant Ethan Nordean - 18 years (tied with Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes for the longest sentence thus far)

On deck this coming Tuesday is Proud Boys Leader Enrique Tarrio (convicted of seditious conspiracy)

The Judge that oversaw the case and sentenced the individuals named above, Timothy J. Kelly, is a member of the conservative Federalist Society and was appointed to the bench by Donald John Trump.

The sentences were all substantially less than what DOJ asked for (correctly IMO) ... but hopefully will still serve as an effective deterrent, for any similarly-situated delusional miscreants and assorted morons who have similar thoughts and inclinations for the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coalminer

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The Judge that oversaw the case and sentenced the individuals named above, Timothy J. Kelly, is a member of the conservative Federalist Society and was appointed to the bench by Donald John Trump.
I'm sure our all loving, truth telling, concerned about the less fortunate EO members won't be too quick to mention this.
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
The sentences were all substantially less than what DOJ asked for (correctly IMO) ... but hopefully will still serve as an effective deterrent, for any similarly-situated delusional miscreants and assorted morons who have similar thoughts and inclinations for the future.
With these conviction and over 1,000 others, the deterrent effect of the Jan 6 sentences is working. Trump's calls for his supporters to protest have gone mostly unanswered. So much so that he has stopped making the embarrassing calls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLENT

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
I'm sure our all loving, truth telling, concerned about the less fortunate EO members won't be too quick to mention this.
Or they'll figure out a way to reveal the hidden truth that this judge is a Disney watching secret trans in a robe, not a real judge and not a real Federalist Society member. And it wasn't even Trump who appointed him, but a non-existent group of Democrats who by means of an unknown deal previously made under a non-existent law, are able to appoint judges that Trump did not appoint, but still call them Trump appointees.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RLENT and Ragman

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Trump Does Not Own the Rights to his Mug Shot Photo

GA mug shots are considered to be public information, along with name, age, sex, offense and custody status.

As usual, MSNBC has published their own truth, which appears to be in direct conflict with the GA Open Records Act. Of all the liberal media outlets, MSNBC is the worst possible source for reliable, unbiased information.

"Are Georgia Inmate Records Public Information?

Yes. Inmate records are considered public in Georgia under the Georgia Open Records Act..."

 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: RLENT

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
GA mug shots are considered to be public information, along with name, age, sex, offense and custody status.

As usual, MSNBC has published their own truth, which appears to be in direct conflict with the GA Open Records Act. Of all the liberal media outlets, MSNBC is the worst possible source for reliable, unbiased information.

"Are Georgia Inmate Records Public Information?

Yes. Inmate records are considered public in Georgia under the Georgia Open Records Act..."

This is the problem. People relying on MSNBC to get their “news”.
 
Top