The classified documents were also moved twice. It didn’t have a scif and secret service protection, nor even security for that matter. Unlike what Trump had.Those Ukraine and China documents were there for around 6 years too. Wow.
The classified documents were also moved twice. It didn’t have a scif and secret service protection, nor even security for that matter. Unlike what Trump had.Those Ukraine and China documents were there for around 6 years too. Wow.
We have a wonderful opportunity here to rationally examine how Biden and Trump are treated under the law regarding the classified documents in question. It's disappointing to see you use the cases purely for spin instead.The classified documents were also moved twice. It didn’t have a scif and secret service protection, nor even security for that matter. Unlike what Trump had.
I saw the news about the first find, but nothing about a second. What second location? Details please?And a second location has been found with more classified documents from Biden as vp
Except one was a President with authority to declassify documents. The other was a former VP ( without that authority) and was a private citizen.We have a wonderful opportunity here to rationally examine how Biden and Trump are treated under the law regarding the classified documents in question. It's disappointing to see you use the cases purely for spin instead.
I think a side-by-side comparison would be really interesting and informative. Any number of questions can be asked and the two cases can be directly compared.
For example:
How many documents are involved? For Trump it is one number. For Biden it is another.
When did the Government learn they were missing? For Trump it is one date. For Biden it is another.
How did they learn they were missing?
What did the National Archives do when they were discovered missing?
Etc, Etc. Etc.
I think the law should be equally applied to both Trump and Biden. And I'm watching with great interest to see if it happens. My watching is guided by questions like those asked above.
Yep, a private citizen moving classified documents around here and there and over there.2 different locations and from what I understand some of those files that Biden had was not to ever have even as vice president.
Second thing is Biden had the files for OVER 6 years....in unsecured closets.
As you know, I've been consistently critical of news stories that cite unidentified sources or unconfirmed info. In many cases, the stories turn out to be true as they further develop. But in many other cases, the stories turn out to be unsubstantiated and their writers are rarely held accountable for the BS they put out.2 different locations and from what I understand some of those files that Biden had was not to ever have even as vice president.
Second thing is Biden had the files for OVER 6 years....in unsecured closets.
That's a fair and reasonable approach, but the White House has noticeably not denied anything about the second batch of records. Considering Biden's cognitive state, he likely has no idea where he may have left records and documents over the years since he was VP to the present day.As you know, I've been consistently critical of news stories that cite unidentified sources or unconfirmed info. In many cases, the stories turn out to be true as they further develop. But in many other cases, the stories turn out to be unsubstantiated and their writers are rarely held accountable for the BS they put out.
In this case, regarding the second batch of documents that are said by some to exist, all we have to go on is "a person familiar with the matter," and the location of the second batch "remains unclear."
Some details about the first batch are clear and confirmed, and more details about that batch are likely to emerge. I'll remain skeptical about the so-called second batch, if it exists at all, until actual facts emerge.
... except the Hunter Biden laptop was absolutely positively confirmed to be Russian propaganda, Trump was elected because of Russian interference, Trump insulted the military by calling them “suckers and losers,” and Trump is literally Hitler, and all that came from confirmed, trusted sources like the legacy media.That's a fair and reasonable approach...
We also have to wonder about the stories and events that aren't being reported. The Hunter Biden laptop story was quashed before it was spun as Russian propaganda, and so was the UPenn documents discovery. Had both been reported in a timely manner they would likely have unfavorably influenced elections for the Democrats. So where does the public find reliable sources of information?Perhaps a more reasoned approach would be to err on the side of extreme skepticism of any news story. The business model of the news media is no longer to inform the public.