Never said otherwise. Try to keep up.So Jan 6th was not all "peaceful tourists" then ?
I think we are making some progress.
Last edited:
Never said otherwise. Try to keep up.So Jan 6th was not all "peaceful tourists" then ?
I think we are making some progress.
Why was it necessary then for that particular event to flood the inside of the building with protesters?I wasn't familiar that particular event, but from what I can gather thus far there was an order of magnitude of difference.
It was a protest! Nobody ever said protesting was wrong.Why was it necessary then for that particular event to flood the inside of the building with protesters?
Are you really that dense?The fact that the media and Democrats keep calling jan 6th a insurrection is funny because if it really was one they would have brought guns to the fight and be in charge already.....yet nobody in that large group shot anyone......and oh they didn't take over.
You didn’t answer the question.It was a protest! Nobody ever said protesting was wrong.
The violence in Washington is the difference, but you already know this.
Perhaps it was, at this point, we'll never know.You didn’t answer the question.
Perhaps what was?Perhaps it was, at this point, we'll never know.
The criteria necessary for an insurrection (see earlier post by Turtle) seem to be met in the May 2020 violence from the Marxist radicals directed at the White House and the sitting POTUS. Not only was a threat posed, but carried out since many injuries were actually inflicted on Capitol police and Secret Service personnel. Using the "Babbitt rationale", they would have been entirely justified in opening fire on these insurrectionists since they were carrying out an intended arson attack on the White House and threatening to lynch the President. Why aren't a significant number of these genuine criminals rotting in a DC jail?“Posing a threat”? Yeah or Nay?
“Justified” by relevant authorities with a definite interest in covering their…No need to rationalize something that was justified, and was found to be so by the relevant authorities.
The fact that the media and Democrats keep calling jan 6th a insurrection is funny
because if it really was one they would have brought guns to the fight
and be in charge already.....
yet nobody in that large group shot anyone......and oh they didn't take over.
Never said otherwise. Try to keep up.
It was a protest! Nobody ever said protesting was wrong.
The violence in Washington is the difference, but you already know this.
Many of us have probably forgotten the extent of the rioting, property damage and injuries that occurred in DC during the BLM/Antifa mayhem during late May 2020 (see article below). This went on for several days and required calling in the DC police, Secret Service, National Guard and military troops to contain the mobs, protect the White House and restore order. The Jan 6th riot was nowhere close to this anarchy, but regardless is being compared to Pearl Harbor, 9/11 and the Civil War by the mainstream media and Biden/Harris.
We didn't see a massive roundup by the Justice Dept of the criminals who actually posed a threat to the White House and the sitting POTUS.
Neither has there been continued coverage by the media or outrage from politicians a year later. But then again, it was BLM/Antifa - all year long.
“Justified” by relevant authorities with a definite interest in covering their…
Could have fooled me.I'm well aware of what you said.
No need to "keep up" ...
No the cops had guns.....nobody that went into the Capitol building other than law enforcement had guns.It also happens to be accurate.
Some did.
Or dead ... and planted six feet under.
Failed insurrections and coups are just practice sessions for the next time.