There are anecdotal exception to everything. Everything.Gee, I don't know, maybe these people who think that modern Christian men, "keep their wives down", had better have a word with MY wife, of soon to be 41 years. She lets me think I am in charge ALL the time!
If you are referring to me, you're dead wrong. These aren't observations from afar or anything else of that nature. They are first hand experiences of things I've witnessed. These are people I know, friends, and some relatives. These are issues which have been discussed at length over many years.It is funny how often it seems that flawed observation from afar, or, 3rd or 4th hand "stories", seldom hold up to the realities.
You want a battle of anecdotals? I could start with my own, that of my parents, one that I lived up close and personal. They were married a really long time, long enough that you might even label it a success. And you'd be wrong. And I wouldn't use a single book to tell you all about it.I wonder, how many of those who feel we are "holding" our women back, would wish to share THEIR success stories? How well has THEIR "modern" ways worked for them?
That's not an answer, it's a deflection.What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
You're a grown man and are entitled to believe whatever you want. The truth is easily obtainable, however.I doubt very much that a majority of southern men "force" their women into subservience. I also doubt that those who believe that can prove it. I also doubt that a majority of southern women would STAND for being forced into subservience and that there is any proof of that.
That's because it's out of your own personal experience and you cannot fathom it unless you've experienced it. In the realm of Southern Christianity, it is, absolutely, the norm, because the Bible demands it.Does it happen? Yep. Is it the norm? I find it unlikely.
Well, the Bible, and their parents and preachers for their whole lives, tells them they are right. You can be right about anything, as long as you have the Bible to back you up on it. And in this case, there's a lot in there to back it up. One mention in the Bible would be enough, but this one is driven home time and time again. So, it's really important."Modern women" writing web sites, telling others what THEY should do? What makes them think that THEY are right? What makes them think that those who CHOOSE, (notice I did not say forced) a lifestyle that is different, are wrong?
You're preaching to the choir, Brother!People, even women, in THIS country, are entitled to live as they choose. So called "modern women" have NO business telling others how to live. Just as those who have more "traditional" tastes should not be doing the same.
You reap what you sow. Women wanted liberation and equality, now they have it.I will tell you one thing, and this is just my personal observations over my 63 years, far more women today look "grumpy" compared to what I remember in years passed. I don't know that is what I am seeing, it is how I perceive what I see. Large number just look unhappy most of the time.
This thread _ IS _ the other side of the coin.The otherside of the coin...
Non-Christian? You mean like Muslims?What about nonChristian men that mistreat thier wifes and girlfriends?
Why single our Muslims? I know lots of Muslims that are very kind people that have class.Why single out Country Folks? I know lots of Country folks that are very kind people that have class.
. . . I know lots of Muslims that are very kind people that have class.
It may well be funny to you - but it ain't anywhere near as funny as your ignoring and avoidance of answering the question I posed to you about how many women conducted the Mass when you were attending Catholic church ...Its irrelevant now that's funny.
As was pointed out earlier, Christians do continue to exist once their butts rise off the pew and they exit the building ...So in other words you haven't attended church on a regular basis as an adult am I reading that right? Your simply repeating the claims you hear others make.
If your assertion is that gender discrimination and ill-treatment doesn't exist simply because it is not always present in all cases or instances, I think you are on fairly shaky ground ...Modern day church I'm america has a huge number of successful independent married woman. The same is true for successful single women.
Not in all cases.They actually get to sit wherever they like during service.
You're not making sense. To have Jabbar as an example of class is laughable.LOL ... desperation much ?
Straw man much ?We have EO members glad to besmirch an entire region of the United States as wife-beaters??? Now, that is low class. Very low.
LOL ... uhm ... it sounds like you actually are ... on all counts ...If I were a Southern male reading this scandalous BS, I would be outraged.
Avoiding the sharp shards of the falling, broken glass would probably be a wise idea ... assuming one wished to avoid being shredded into a oozing pile of hamburger ...I would notice a well known EO representative whose every post carries the Load-1 banner is leading the charge to denigrate the South and Appalachia. Certainly, EO nor Load-1 would want to associate themselves with this outrageous condemnation of the American South. The South is an industrial powerhouse shipping enormous amounts of freight. After reading such bigoted garbage, a Southern shipper might rightly conclude that his freight would be just as well served by a Southern expedite company, leaving the phones to ring less often with good loads for the arrogant North. A silent boycott.
It is vitally important to know who your audience is when speaking or posting in a public forum. Speaking scandalously against one's countrymen is bad for business. The South is still part of this nation and they ship ALOT of freight. Arrogance often leads otherwise smart men to say really stupid things. An apology to the South is absolutely in order.
Straw man much ?
Tell me ... would what you describe above be in any way analogous to besmirching an entire religion - the second largest one in the world ?
LOL ... uhm ... it sounds like you actually are ... on all counts ...
Avoiding the sharp shards of the falling, broken glass would probably be a wise idea ... assuming one wished to avoid being shredded into a oozing pile of hamburger ...
Unresponsive to the question posed, decidedly unfriendly (due to the name-calling) ... as well as highly amusing - in light of the post I was replying to ...Go away, troll.
Go away, troll.
Heheheh ... good eye .... but don't forget the outrage ...From "you can't insult us, we have character & thick skin" to "you owe us an apology" in 84 posts, lol.
Perhaps timely:FWIW: all the references to wife beating & physical abuse are missing the mark - it's not what I meant at all. That happens everywhere, and no one condones it [at least in public] any longer. The repression I meant [and I was very clear about it, so I don't know why y'all are even talking about wife beating] is that the final authority is always the man's. You can treat a woman with respect, but the bottom line is that MEN hold the ultimate power, and we all know it.
Whooped de do, so there isn't any female priests. That example doesn't mean women are sub servant .It may well be funny to you - but it ain't anywhere near as funny as your ignoring and avoidance of answering the question I posed to you about how many women conducted the Mass when you were attending Catholic church ...
At least she answered up - and seemingly in an honest manner.
As was pointed out earlier, Christians do continue to exist once their butts rise off the pew and they exit the building ...
One does not necessarily have to go to church every Sunday to observe them in action ... in fact, it might be said that one is much more likely to get a more accurate picture outside of church, where they aren't necessarily always on their best behavior for appearances sake ...
If your assertion is that gender discrimination and ill-treatment doesn't exist simply because it is not always present in all cases or instances, I think you are on fairly shaky ground ...
Not in all cases.
Well, it certainly does mean that they've have been excluded from ordination into the priesthood ...Whooped de do, so there isn't any female priests. That example doesn't mean women are sub servant .