By definition, Pesky as it is.By stating facts? Pesky as they are.
By definition, Pesky as it is.By stating facts? Pesky as they are.
At this point Kamala Harris's opinion of the GOP won't move a single Republican vote into her column, especially when accompanied by Liz Cheney. However, it will be interesting to hear what she and today's Democrat party stand for.This is Perfect
"Kamala Harris is making an unusual pilgrimage today — to the birthplace of the GOP"
Harris will highlight the noble and principled party the Republican Party once was, and she'll contrast it to the Republican Party of today. That will be meaningful to a number of present-day Republicans who dislike what the Republican Party has become. I believe this campaign stop and message will shift a number of Republican votes into the Harris camp.
My answer was more about the VP running mate making a difference, not the debate. But that is what you were referring too. As I recall after the Palin/ Biden debate, pollster Frank Luntz’s undecided focus group favored Palin and he predicted a favorable movement in the polls afterwards. That prediction turned out to be wrong.Incorrect, That running mate debate had little discernible effect on the election outcome.
From ChatGPT:
In terms of actual votes, it's difficult to say how much Palin's debate performance influenced the final outcome of the election. McCain was already facing an uphill battle due to the economic crisis and Barack Obama’s rising popularity. The debate didn't appear to decisively alter the trajectory of the race, and Obama won comfortably with 365 electoral votes to McCain's 173. However, Palin’s pick did solidify McCain's appeal to certain voter groups, even if it didn't significantly change the broader electoral map.
I saw that Political piece and it surprised me. This is something that can be easily corrected. We'll just have to wait and see if it will be. Harris may not think this is a problem to be corrected. Like those expressing concern in the article, I think it is.#nofireinthebelly
View attachment 24235
Fix it for ya.It’s like she doesn’t really want to be president. Her actions indicate this.
Trump’s actions indicate he does want to be Dictator . He shows up for interviews, TownHalls, rallies, and hurricane relief help. His schedule the rest of the month will be filled to the brim.
His poll numbers are in better shape than the last two elections at this point. His campaign has a history of closing strong come Election Day too. He has more money on hand than four years ago at this point.
He won’t be terribly outspent and his message completely drowned out either.
X will provide an open platform as well.
It appears to be all shaping up to be a Trump win. It helps immensely that he wants it more and is willing to work harder to get it than his opponent.
Both candidates want to win. Both are acting like they do. Their particular schedules and strategies do not indicate otherwise.It’s like she doesn’t really want to be president. Her actions indicate this.
Trump’s actions indicate he does want to be president.
I don’t know why those constitutional powers of the presidency would be corruptly used since the process of bringing those cases were.Both candidates want to win. Both are acting like they do. Their particular schedules and strategies do not indicate otherwise.
The stakes are higher for Trump. If he loses, he loses the ability to corruptly use the powers of the presidency to make his most-serious legal cases go away. For Trump a win or loss is the difference between a long prison sentence or not.
On both counts, the real law says otherwise.I don’t know why those constitutional powers of the presidency would be corruptly used since the process of bringing those cases were.
It would be merely righting a wrong, constitutionally of course.
Obviously, times change. Circumstances change. I myself criticized Harris for being an invisible vice president years ago. Her strong performance as a candidate changed my mind.