Yes LBD, it does. You know me to be a smart man. If I was wrong, don't you think I'd know it? It censors profanity just fine, it just doesn't censor it to your own personal satisfaction.
The forum software blocks out the entire ****
It does if the entire word is listed in the software's Bad Word Dictionary, yes.
and what I'm referring to is when the w**d is only partially masked which means the user knows the word shouldn't be used so they go with w**d instead.
Oh, you mean like "In wartime, sh*t happens." Yeah, well, that isn't profanity, unless someone wants to see profanity where it doesn't exit. The forum software uses asterisks to mask profanity, and there's nothing wrong with users censoring themselves in the same manner. People want to express themselves, and as long as what they type isn't real, honest to good profanity, lighten up and let 'em.
We all know the automatic checker doesn't differentiate when a proper name etc has a blocked word as part of it. That doesn't change what the reminder is about. No profanity whether typed in full or with masking.
People make an effort to post something that
isn't profanity, but in your mind that's
not good enough? We can only post things that meet the rigid albeit unwritten rules from the Book of Leo? Is that how it works?
"No profanity whether typed in full or with masking."
I've read the Code of Conduct cover to cover, and that ain't in there. There is absolutely nothing within the Code of Conduct that prohibits using words with asterisks in place of letters. At least people are making an honest effort to censor themselves, even though it's brain-dead simple to get around the forum software's censoring filters. If you see something profane instead of what is quite literally a euphemism of asterisks, then it's your problem, and it's a serious one. You have GOT to get a grip on your insatiable urge to control people with that morally and hypocritically deranged sledge hammer.
For far too long many moderators, you in particular, have failed to moderate, and instead have made it a habit to let things go in threads until they got out of control, and then go overboard and shut the thread down. Code of Conduct-violating posts very early on in threads should be deleted, a warning issued for everyone to see, and then move on with the discussion.
Clearly, someone called a huddle of moderators and suggested that threads be moderated before they get out of control. (Which is an excellent idea, I wish I'd thought of it. <snort>)
But now you're going overboard with
that, tooooo, and are trying to moderate something that doesn't even need moderating, simply because you cannot control your need to control. There was nothing whatsoever in this thread that even remotely indicated the thread was about to go out of control or start violating the Code of Conduct, until you stepped in and took control. Good job. <snort>
You, as an EO Moderator, advocate cold-blooded murder of spammers, the killing of illegal aliens as they cross the border, want to hand out life and death sentences for crimes that do not warrant it in the minds of rational people, and now is just itching to hammer someone over a few strategically placed asterisks. Reminds me of an out of control pit bull that could use a muzzle, collar and a leash. Then again, if I were you, I'd be wanting to just shoot it and teach it a lesson. Aren't you glad I'm not you?