Welfare Recipients Driving $15,000 cars

Status
Not open for further replies.

Camper

Not a Member
I talked with one Ford worker..the $10 loss per hour after tax adjustments on the gross and lesser SS and E.I payments..the loss was cut to about 6 bucks an hour or $240 bucks a week not $400 a week....

Well, many who have taken a 100% pay cut would love to be in his shoes.

Speaking of Ford, there's speculation that if the UAW tried to pull a strike, the workers there would side with the company. That would be the ultimate stick in the eye of the UAW. If that happens, I'll be the first in line for a new F150. Nah, nevermind, They'll have to relocate to a RTW state first before they earn one red cent from me. Arizona would be an ideal place for them to relocate.



Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 
Last edited:

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
I remember back in my youth in Ontario...you could own a car as a means of transportation but there was a value limit...you couldn't have a $15,000 car....you'd be forced to sell it and any money made your check would be reduced...
 

Camper

Not a Member
I remember back in my youth in Ontario...you could own a car as a means of transportation but there was a value limit...you couldn't have a $15,000 car....you'd be forced to sell it and any money made your check would be reduced...

$15,000, when you think about it is very liberal. In fact, there are plenty of reliable cars under $1,000. You just have to know what to look for. The general rule of thumb is to stick with japanese 4cylinder models and you will almost never go wrong.



Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 
Last edited:

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
$15,000, when you think about is is very liberal. In fact, there are plenty of reliable cars under $1,000. You just have to know what to look for. The general rule of thumb is to stick with japanese 4cylinder models and you will almost never go wrong.



Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

Agreed....all family functions that are frills should be cancelled....first priority JOB, food for the family and roof over the head...nothing more....bare bones minimum...
 

LisaLouHoo

Expert Expediter
Whether they're paid directly by GM or indirectly through Fidelity, the bottom line is you're a beneficiary of GM which is a beneficiary of our tax dollars. Rest assured those premiums paid for what you call life insurance were subsidized in part by a third party.

As far as the effect on the economy yanking these pensions would have: I say bring it on...As I've said before this last recession was no where near long enough.

You might have "lived it" but that doesn't mean you're any more knowledgeable on the topic than those of us who have worked in the real world all our lives. On the contrary, you obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about.



Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
I never held a union job in my life. Forgive me for studying hard, being an honor student, going to college, securing the best non-union jobs out here, marrying well, saving smart, paying off a 15 year mortgage in 7 years, retiring at 42, learning how to enjoy life again after the death of my husband of 24 years. I haven't lived in the real world? I worked and lived very hard to get to where I am today.

If you recall,GW Bush mandated companies had to insure pensions after the Enron debacle. The GM pensions were not (how many times do I have to say this?) involved in the bailout. Perhaps look to the people who do not patronize American auto manufacturers.

Just admit you're out of turn when it comes to the UAW pension debate. You trying to prove me wrong when I am not is tantamount to you saying "I know you are but what am I?"

Show me proof you draw a domestic auto worker pension. Then you will have some credence in this discussion.


"Bruises fade and bones will mend-but a psyche can be ruined FOREVER" : LisaLouHoo, c. 2008
 

Camper

Not a Member
I never held a union job in my life. Forgive me for studying hard, being an honor student, going to college, securing the best non-union jobs out here, marrying well, saving smart, paying off a 15 year mortgage in 7 years, retiring at 42, learning how to enjoy life again after the death of my husband of 24 years. I haven't lived in the real world? I worked and lived very hard to get to where I am today.

If you recall,GW Bush mandated companies had to insure pensions after the Enron debacle. The GM pensions were not (how many times do I have to say this?) involved in the bailout. Perhaps look to the people who do not patronize American auto manufacturers.

Just admit you're out of turn when it comes to the UAW pension debate. You trying to prove me wrong when I am not is tantamount to you saying "I know you are but what am I?"

Show me proof you draw a domestic auto worker pension. Then you will have some credence in this discussion.


"Bruises fade and bones will mend-but a psyche can be ruined FOREVER" : LisaLouHoo, c. 2008

And what does this have to do with the topic at hand? Also, if you live in Michigan where houses cost less than cars(still over priced), paying a house off in 7 years is no accomplishment. I'm also guessing you don't have kids or any actual responsibilities. Try living in a more competive area, having kids and then we'll talk about paying a house off being an accomplishment. As for the rest of your life story, a). that's further proof of how anyone can go to college(again, no accomplishment) and b). nobody cares. Stick to the topic.
 
Last edited:

paullud

Veteran Expediter
I never held a union job in my life. Forgive me for studying hard, being an honor student, going to college, securing the best non-union jobs out here, marrying well, saving smart, paying off a 15 year mortgage in 7 years, retiring at 42, learning how to enjoy life again after the death of my husband of 24 years. I haven't lived in the real world? I worked and lived very hard to get to where I am today.

If you recall,GW Bush mandated companies had to insure pensions after the Enron debacle. The GM pensions were not (how many times do I have to say this?) involved in the bailout. Perhaps look to the people who do not patronize American auto manufacturers.

Just admit you're out of turn when it comes to the UAW pension debate. You trying to prove me wrong when I am not is tantamount to you saying "I know you are but what am I?"

Show me proof you draw a domestic auto worker pension. Then you will have some credence in this discussion.


"Bruises fade and bones will mend-but a psyche can be ruined FOREVER" : LisaLouHoo, c. 2008

It's great that you worked hard and were able to benefit from the fruits of your labor. You should try and get into politics and straighten out your state, get the welfare system in better shape and lower taxes. Michigan is a beautiful state but it has been mismanaged and has been run into the ground by welfare programs and handouts. I would like to move to MI because it has a lot of potential to become great.

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 

Camper

Not a Member
It's great that you worked hard and were able to benefit from the fruits of your labor. You should try and get into politics and straighten out your state, get the welfare system in better shape and lower taxes. Michigan is a beautiful state but it has been mismanaged and has been run into the ground by welfare programs and handouts. I would like to move to MI because it has a lot of potential to become great.

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

Michigan will never be what it should until it loses at least half it's current population and becomes more like Minnesota(bigger with half the people). The last thing it needs is transplants from New York or anywhere for that matter.
 

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Michigan will never be what it should until it loses at least half it's current population and becomes more like Minnesota(bigger with half the people). The last thing it needs is transplants from New York or anywhere for that matter.

I would say one of the best things for MI would be for people to realize it's potential and move there to start over running the government and starting businesses.

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 

Camper

Not a Member
I would say one of the best things for MI would be for people to realize it's potential and move there to start over running the government and starting businesses.

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

Actually, the best thing MI has going for it is it's the only state to have lost population.

Open space and wild life should be all that's there. The last thing they need are know it all Gen-yers coming in.

I'd say New England would be a much better fit for those types of people, or better yet, right where you are in New York.

So, back to topic: Welfare queens driving $15,000 cars
 
Last edited:

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Actually, the best thing MI has going for it is it's the only state to have lost population.

Open space and wild life should be all that's there. The last thing they need are know it all Gen-yers coming in.

I'd say New England would be a much better fit for those types of people, or better yet, right where you are in New York.

The best place for those types is Massachusetts or California, that way they can even have their pick of weather. MI needs people of a different political spectrum to move in and change it's ways. They need people to come in that are willing to invest time, labor, and capital into creating a great place to do business. I really don't know of any know it all Generation Y people, they are usually into technology, green ideals, and fame. They are actually very far from being the know it all type. The know it all type is from previous generations and a lot of conservatives and liberals of today that feel the need to jam their views down everyones throat because after all they know best.

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 

Camper

Not a Member
The best place for those types is Massachusetts or California, that way they can even have their pick of weather.
California has more than enough people


MI needs people of a different political spectrum to move in and change it's ways. They need people to come in that are willing to invest time, labor, and capital into creating a great place to do business.

The only business MI should have is tourism. Again, I think Minnesota is a good model for what MI should be. It has far fewer people, more open space and less government fat. Actually, Wisconsin is another potential role model for what MI should become, especially given the new anti-union/anti growth administration they elected.

I really don't know of any know it all Generation Y people, they are usually into technology, green ideals, and fame. They are actually very far from being the know it all type.

Well, you must not know too many of them then. Most of the ones I know are very much entitlement minded. The only ones I know of who aren't like that are foreign born ones. In fact, I would argue that first generation immigrants, in general have the best work ethic. They're far less to complain about wages and far more likely to appreciate having a job in the first place.
 
Last edited:

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Well, you must not know too many of them then. Most of the ones I know are very much entitlement minded.

Given that my age puts me at the tail end of Generation X, I went to school with plenty of Generation Y people and rarely saw a know it all mentality. The know it all mentality usually shows up in people that think they have experienced all life has to offer and therefore need to educate everyone else. The other thing you mentioned about being entitlement minded really has to do more with the politics of the environment the person grows up in. In a state like MI a lot have seen welfare as a way of life so they continue that cycle.

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 

Camper

Not a Member
Given that my age puts me at the tail end of Generation X, I went to school with plenty of Generation Y people and rarely saw a know it all mentality.

Actually, if you're 31 like you said you are in a previous post, you're technically a member of Generation Y which spans from 1979 through, I believe 1999. Those born in 2000 or later are part of what's called the millennial generation.

The know it all mentality usually shows up in people that think they have experienced all life has to offer and therefore need to educate everyone else.

No, actually, the most unassuming generation, IMO happens to be the WWII generation- Those who lived through the Great Depression and the 2nd World War. IMO, this pervasive entitlement mentality started with the Baby Boom Generation and has gotten worse with each generation thereafter.


The other thing you mentioned about being entitlement minded really has to do more with the politics of the environment the person grows up in. In a state like MI a lot have seen welfare as a way of life so they continue that cycle.

This isn't a problem unique to Michigan or any state in particular. This is very much a nationwide problem.
 
Last edited:

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
And what does this have to do with the topic at hand?

The topic got derailed by a comment about UAW workers using food stamps, which was challenged by 2 members [and hasn't been answered yet], but you accepted it and began yet another rant about the unions. Which brought a rebuttal from a member with personal experience on the subject, so you switched the focus to the member, saying "You don't have a clue", "you have no say in this argument" and several other personal attacks. The paragraph below is more attacks against the person whose firsthand knowledge says your opinion is misinformed:
Also, if you live in Michigan where houses cost less than cars(still over priced), paying a house off in 7 years is no accomplishment. I'm also guessing you don't have kids or any actual responsibilities. Try living in a more competive area, having kids and then we'll talk about paying a house off being an accomplishment. As for the rest of your life story, a). that's further proof of how anyone can go to college(again, no accomplishment) and b). nobody cares.

After the personal attack [which was not reciprocated], you finish with an arrogant command to do that which you have proven unable to do yourself, yet again.

How many threads have been derailed in the same manner, by the same person?
Stick to the topic.
 

Camper

Not a Member
And what does this have to do with the topic at hand?

The topic got derailed by a comment about UAW workers using food stamps, which was challenged by 2 members [and hasn't been answered yet], but you accepted it and began yet another rant about the unions. Which brought a rebuttal from a member with personal experience on the subject, so you switched the focus to the member, saying "You don't have a clue", "you have no say in this argument" and several other personal attacks. The paragraph below is more attacks against the person whose firsthand knowledge says your opinion is misinformed:
Also, if you live in Michigan where houses cost less than cars(still over priced), paying a house off in 7 years is no accomplishment. I'm also guessing you don't have kids or any actual responsibilities. Try living in a more competive area, having kids and then we'll talk about paying a house off being an accomplishment. As for the rest of your life story, a). that's further proof of how anyone can go to college(again, no accomplishment) and b). nobody cares.

After the personal attack [which was not reciprocated], you finish with an arrogant command to do that which you have proven unable to do yourself, yet again.

How many threads have been derailed in the same manner, by the same person?
Stick to the topic.

Two things:

a).I'm not the one who derailed this thread. You'd have to take that up with Greg. BTW..I would be interested to know what source he got his information from. UAW workers collecting food stamps does seem far fetched but it wouldn't surprise me.

b). this thread didn't become personal until Lisa made it personal by bringing her personal life into it..Just saying..
 
Last edited:

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
I'm not the one who derailed this thread.

Yes, you did: post 17.

You'd have to take that up with Greg.

I already asked for verification of Greg's statement, and will wait for his response before continuing any further on the subject of union members. But you couldn't refrain from the opening to rant about the unions, whether it's true or false, and that's what derailed the thread, not Greg's comment.
Lisa responded to your ignorant [because YOU have no firsthand knowledge] comments, and again, [as when I replied with firsthand knowledge on Swift's training methods] you switched the attack to the person. When the person continued to refute your claims with facts, you told her to shut up - as in "stay on topic".


BTW..I would be interested to know what source he got his information from.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top