US confirms ambassador killed in Libya

bobwg

Expert Expediter
Appears Obama gang ignored security /threat assements from the CIA,DOD, and others that Libya was getting more and more dangerous leading up to the attack
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Considering there haven't been any "anniversary" attacks in the past, there was no reason to expect any on this particular occasion. Having said that, any embassy in an Islamic country, or the country of a non-ally or certainly an enemy, should be armed to the teeth 24/7. The US embassy in places like Canada and the Bahamas and Brazil have more security than some do in these Muslim countries.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Appears Obama gang ignored security /threat assements from the CIA,DOD, and others that Libya was getting more and more dangerous leading up to the attack
He could have learned the same thing just watching the news.
 

bobwg

Expert Expediter
He could have learned the same thing just watching the news.

Too busy playing golf, shooting hoops, traveling around raising money, acting like a rock star with hollywood left, being on the VIew and David Letterman.
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The US embassy in places like Canada . . .have more security than some do in these Muslim countries.

Ya can't blame 'em.

Ya know how wacko those Canadians can be!

canadian-comedians-and-comic-actors.jpg
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
In just a few short presidential terms we've gone from Nixon being on Laugh In to the entire administration being a Rowan and Martin skit.

Progress.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Considering there haven't been any "anniversary" attacks in the past, there was no reason to expect any on this particular occasion. Having said that, any embassy in an Islamic country, or the country of a non-ally or certainly an enemy, should be armed to the teeth 24/7. The US embassy in places like Canada and the Bahamas and Brazil have more security than some do in these Muslim countries.

Except for the warnings they had about a possible attack. Sounds like a good reason to me.

Sent from my Fisher Price X900 via EO Forums
 

Humble2drive

Expert Expediter
Considering there haven't been any "anniversary" attacks in the past, there was no reason to expect any on this particular occasion.

There were no "successful" anniversary attacks; however, this does not mean that there were no attacks planned or threatened.
We the people are not privy to information regarding the threats of terrorist activity but we are told in general terms that U.S. security is on higher alert leading up to each anniversary for obvious reasons.
There will always be a reason to expect and prepare for attacks on Sept. 11 with increased security around the globe. Especially Canada!
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
There had been warnings regarding possible attacks, and in spite of that "The night of the Benghazi attack, four lightly armed Libyans and five American security offices were on duty".
One has to wonder if Ambassador Stevens had been requesting more security and/or protection from the U.S. Marines only to have his requests ignored by the Obama/Clinton state dept.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Obama is going to lie about this, and get away with it, just like Carter did. :mad:

If Obama is smart he won't say a word...it'll all fall on Clintons doorstep.....someone erred and people died.....like any war/battle when the brass goofup, boots on the ground die...:(
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
If Obama is smart he won't say a word...it'll all fall on Clintons doorstep.....someone erred and people died.....like any war/battle when the brass goofup, boots on the ground die...:(

No, it will be swept under the table, just as the mess in Iran was. There is NO need for diplomats to have been killed. They are not soldiers. They were abandoned. Obama is as useless, even MORE useless, than Carter was. Not that he gives a flip who is killed or why, he never put HIS slimy neck on the line. :mad:
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
No, it will be swept under the table, just as the mess in Iran was. There is NO need for diplomats to have been killed. They are not soldiers. They were abandoned. Obama is as useless, even MORE useless, than Carter was. Not that he gives a flip who is killed or why, he never put HIS slimy neck on the line. :mad:
i know buck stops at the top....but it was Clintons job, she blew it.....she should be ashamed for the bad decision...or whatever happened.
unfortunately this is all for show and will probably be swept away....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
i know buck stops at the top....but it was Clintons job, she blew it.....she should be ashamed for the bad decision...or whatever happened.
unfortunately this is all for show and will probably be swept away....

I very much doubt that is how it happened.

It is the president would would make the call to remove those types of people from an embassy. The President would have been briefed on the declining situation. It is the presidents call to pull people out or to make MAJOR improvements on security. It WAS THIS president who instructed the Marine Guard, through the State Dept, to no allow them to carry ammunition when on duty. My nephew got those 'no ammo' order when working at the embassy in Romania.

Just as it was Carter who did NOT pull our people out when he KNEW that embassy was going to be attacked within a 3 day time frame.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
At the briefing I thought it go something like...

Obama: Hillary, how is our security at the embassies?
Hillary: Fine, Mr President...

Just saying....
 
Top