Is Trump for Aid to Ukraine or Against It?
Trump–Ukraine scandal - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
'Nuff said.
Is Trump for Aid to Ukraine or Against It?
As I expected, Trump did not raise $50 million as he claimed. The campaign finance reports are now out and nothing near that $50 megadonor total is reported. It seems Trump did not collect a lot of cash which he can spend. He seems to have collected pledges which he cannot spend unless those who promised to contribute come through at a later date. And even if they do, Trump remains far behind Biden in both his fundraising and spending on campaign expenses (millions paid to lawyers to defend Trump in court are not campaign expenses).Trump routinely exaggerates his finances. I'll wait for the official campaign finance reports to come out before I believe a word of his Florida fundraiser claim.
I'm finding it interesting that the Maga weenies have been awfully quiet on this subject.Is Trump for Aid to Ukraine or Against It?
In an overwhelming bipartisan vote, the US House approved a massive aid package for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. Regarding Ukraine aid, a number of commentators are spinning it as a major defeat for Trump. Republicans and Democrats, and even GOP Speaker Mike Johnson, joined together to provide aid Trump fiercely opposed.
But as I read more, I'm not sure where Trump stands on Ukraine aid. If he is in fact opposed to it, and if he did in fact urge House Republicans to oppose it, the commentary is right. This was a massive rebuke for Trump. What confuses me are the statements Trump has made, some very recently, that seem to support Ukraine aid.
There are people on this forum who follow Trump's policies closer than I do. So let me ask. Is Trump for aid to Ukraine or against it?
The bond stands, but it does not stand as is. The judge imposed new conditions that address the concerns James raised (and I had).Court rules Trump bond stands
Lol lol lolFunny Story
CNN ran this update:
View attachment 23871
Minutes later, the update was edited:
View attachment 23872
Thanks for the proper clarification Phil.The bond stands, but it does not stand as is. The judge imposed new conditions that address the concerns James raised (and I had).
From FOX News:
"The court decided the $175 million needs to be in cash — not in mutual funds or securities where the value can fluctuate. The court said Knight Insurance cannot trade or move the money, but said they will retain control of the account.
"The court also ruled that Knight Insurance must provide a monthly financial statement to James showing the $175 million in cash, and decided that the agreement cannot change without approval from the court."
This is a defeat in that James did not get the bond voided as she sought, but it's a win for the people of New York because the judge cured the major flaws in the bond as originally proposed. Before it was not a bond backed by actual cash controlled by someone other than Trump. Now it is. Before, Trump did not have to lock up $175 million in cash to secure this bond. Now he does. Before, it was not a real bond backed by Trump funds that are held beyond Trump's control. Now it is.
Because the bond stands in its modified form, it stands. And that means James is precluded from seizing Trump's assets until all of Trump's appeal options are exhausted. He'll be able to drag that out for months if not a year or more.
Here is the same story, spun to more accurately communicate the result of today's hearing.
Judge approves safeguards for Donald Trump's $175 million civil business fraud appeal bond
A New York judge approved an agreement Monday to strengthen the $175 million bond in Donald Trump's civil fraud case while he appeals.www.usatoday.com
"Lawyers for Trump and James huddled to reach an agreement under which Schwab will maintain the account in cash and Knight will get exclusive control of the account. Engoron approved the deal."
Trump's Unearned Bonus Comes Tomorrow. Investors Get Diluted
Example: "Trump’s body language changed when Pecker started testifying about the catch-and-kill deal involving McDougal. He started moving his head, squinting and pursing his lips, and then crossed his arms over his chest." (Source: New York Times)I Would Not Like This
I would not want to be in Trump's shoes (or seat) in the courtroom. A number of reporters are in a nearby overflow room, watching the trial via closed circuit TV. One of the cameras views the defense table from the front. Every second, reporters are watching Trump, waiting to report on his every twitch, itch, facial expression, and snooze.