The Trump Card...

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Having a trial in October would go against current DOJ policy about being too close to an election.
I would not put great faith in that policy. An exception is written into it that allows DOJ to pursue a case where the evidence is fully developed, which it is in this case. In any event, October is months away and a lot can happen between now and then that makes this question of little importance now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ragman and RLENT

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I would not put great faith in that policy. An exception is written into it that allows DOJ to pursue a case where the evidence is fully developed, which it is in this case. In any event, October is months away and a lot can happen between now and then that makes this question of little importance now.
Of course there are exceptions when it comes to Trump.
Hopefully Judge Cannon remains prudent and cautious with the important motions that the Trump lawyers are presenting to the court. No need to rush through important constitutional issues before that trial takes place.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RLENT

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Of course there are exceptions when it comes to Trump.
No. Exceptions were written into the policy long before Trump was elected the first time.
Hopefully Judge Cannon remains prudent and cautious with the important motions that the Trump lawyers are presenting to the court. No need to rush through important constitutional issues before that trial takes place.
Of course there is no need. Anything MAGA can do to keep Trump from answering for his crimes is just fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ragman and RLENT

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
No. Exceptions were written into the policy long before Trump was elected the first time.

Of course there is no need. Anything MAGA can do to keep Trump from answering for his crimes is just fine.
It’s not up to MAGA. They’ll just vote in November. It’s now in the hands of SCOTUS to weigh in .
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RLENT

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I would not put great faith in that policy. An exception is written into it that allows DOJ to pursue a case where the evidence is fully developed, which it is in this case.
Interesting. The ones that get to “pursue the case” (Biden’s DOJ)and use the exception are the same that get to determine if the “evidence is fully developed”. No conflict there…
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Interesting. The ones that get to “pursue the case” (Biden’s DOJ)and use the exception are the same that get to determine if the “evidence is fully developed”. No conflict there…

Tell me you don't understand "checks and balances" in our government ... without actually saying it.

:clapping-happy:

:joycat:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ragman and ATeam

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Of course there are exceptions when it comes to Trump.

:joycat:

Hopefully Judge Cannon remains prudent and cautious with the important motions that the Trump lawyers are presenting to the court. No need to rush through important constitutional issues before that trial takes place.

In order for Judge Cannon to remain prudent and cautious, she would have to have a history of behaving that way.

Not much evidence of that ... at least that I have seen.

Fun Fact:

Judge Cannon's husband worked (works ?) for a Mafia mobster:


Being mobbed up is neither prudent or cautious ...

Previous Guy gets Mobby, again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ragman and ATeam

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Another State Disqualifies Trump From Ballot

Ruling in Illinois stayed to allow for appeal.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ragman and RLENT

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
  • Haha
Reactions: Ragman and RLENT

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Reaction to SCOTUS Decision to Hear and Delay the Jan 6 Case

LIz Cheney summarized the views of many who support a speedy trial in the Jan 6 election subversion case. From the reactions and commentary expressed, they don't seem to mind that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, but they are deeply troubled by the slow schedule under which SCOTUS will do it. That schedule makes it highly possible that the lower court will not hear the case until after the election.

One of Trump's major legal goals is to delay all legal action against him until after the election. The idea is he will win the election and then abuse the powers of the presidency to evade justice by making these cases go away. In that regard, by handing Trump a major delay, SCOTUS handed him a major victory.

On another matter, the so-called hush-money trial, which is actually a New York state election subversion trial, begins March 25.

1709204237118.png
 
Last edited:

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Reaction to SCOTUS Decision to Hear and Delay the Jan 6 Case

LIz Cheney summarized the views of many who support a speedy trial in the Jan 6 election subversion case. From the reactions and commentary expressed, they don't seem to mind that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, but they are deeply troubled by the slow schedule under which SCOTUS will do it.

SCOTUS is hearing it on an expedited basis, the schedule isn't all that "slow".

What was slow was them taking it up.

They should have taken it when the SC sought to have them hear it ... but being reluctant to get involved they didn't take it at that point.

To their credit, they seem to have now foreclosed the possibility that Don Cheeto could seek an en banc hearing from Appeals Court for the District of Columbia.

So that's one less possible delay in the mix.

That schedule makes it highly possible that the lower court will not hear the case until after the election.

That's what everyone seems to be fretting about.

Not so sure that all the worry is valid.

Once this case is disposed of, SC Smith and Judge Chutkin have ways of moving forward expeditiously.

One of Trump's major legal goals is to delay all legal action against him until after the election. The idea is he will win the election and then abuse the powers of the presidency to evade justice by making these cases go away. In that regard, by handing Trump a major delay, SCOTUS handed him a major victory.

Yeah ... don't know that's all that great of hot take.

But it certainly would have been preferable had they taken it up sooner ... or just not granted cert for Cheeto's appeal of the Appeals Court decision.
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
But it certainly would have been preferable had they taken it up sooner ... or just not granted cert for Cheeto's appeal of the Appeals Court decision.
It would have been preferable for AG Garland to have appointed Special Counsel Smith months before he did. There was no good reason to delay that but he chose to pussy foot around instead.
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
SC Smith warning Trump's biased Judge she can maybe expect yet another slapdown from the 11th Circuit ... if she doesn't correct the errors in her rulings:

Jack Smith fires a shot across Aileen Cannon's bow over 'clear error'

:clapping-happy:
She seems to now be very careful about doing everything she can to provide Trump with his desired delays, while staying just short of anything that might put the case in the 11th Circuit, where she has been slapped down before, and where she could be removed from this case.

Maybe she and Fani Willis could be roommates at case-removal reform school.
 
Top