The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
Nope.
I'll repeat... When will the same logic be applied to trump's lying?
Your premise is wrong, if you didn’t understand the other word.
Premise is irrelevant. Trump is a serial liar. He long ago forfeited the right to criticize others for lying.
That may turn out to be true but we do not know that yet. Again, this will all be sorted out in court under oath. Then we'll know what's really up.
They appear to have failed that whole “under oath” thing the first time.
McAfee has no choice. This information affirms the testimony made under oath by Robin Yeartie; the phone records - especially considering the times when the calls and texts were made, the pings showing time and location of Wade, all add up to the appearance of impropriety. Do Trump's lawyers have the content of the texts? Regardless, add all this to the trips they took, the sketchy cash reimbursements and the appearance of impropriety is overwhelming. The actual impropriety doesn't have to be proven in court for Willis to be disqualified.
But the issue at hand, and the issue before the Court is not the appearance of impropriety. Few if any people disagree that the Wade/Willis roantic relationship was/is improper. A lot of people, including me go further to say it was idiotic. But that's irrelevant to the question at hand. That question, the question the Court is actually considering, is about a financial conflict of interest. The answer to that question will determine whether or not Willis is disqualified from prosecuting the case against Trump et al.
Yes, the appearance of impropriety, and even their actual impropriety is there, and it is damning to the Willis/Wade professional reputations. But again, that's not the issue before the Court.
Proven or disproven, the impropriety is irrelevant to the question at hand. If a financial conflict of interest can be shown to exist, which Trump has failed to show so far, that becomes more than something improper. That becomes misconduct sufficient to disqualify Willis from the case.
Related is the perjury question. If it can be shown that Wade/Willis committed perjury, that's a level of misconduct that would figure in greater than an improper workplace relationship.
Some are saying that the nature of the texts will likely end up being revealed at some point in the future. But in the meantime, Willis and Wade could merely release them to the judge to exonerate themselves if they want.
Refer to the earlier quote from Judge McAfee in post #17,612. The timing of their romantic relationship is key to the financial impropriety in addition to conflict of interest. (bold emphasis mine)
Last edited:
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Big surprise there ... NOT.
I admit I know essentially nothing about mobile phone tracking technology, and I improperly assumed certain things about it before understanding more. If this "evidence" is admitted, the validity of the technology itself will be questioned.The most advanced technology is what Law Enforcement uses to solve crimes and what was applied in the Willis and Wade case as well.
x.com
x.com
Fani Willis case: Experts are split on reliability of cellphone tracking data
Opinions are divided on the accuracy and reliability of cellphone tracking technology like that used by attorneys for Donald Trump to try to prove that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade are lying about the extent of their romantic relationship.
Trump's Requested Emergency Stay in Carroll Case is Denied
"Federal District Judge Lewis Kaplan [Sunday] morning rejected Donald Trump's request for an emergency stay on the collection of the $83.3 million dollar judgment won by E. Jean Carroll against him. Trump was asking the court for a delay pending post trial motions and appeals.
"In rejecting the motion, the court noted that Trump waited 25 days after the judgment was filed to make his request right before the deadline for Carroll's lawyers to begin attaching liens on his assets. The court also noted that he hasn't even filed any post trial motions yet, only a request to delay the collection of the judgment. Judge Kaplan rejected the request and ordered that briefs be submitted next week." (Source)
"Federal District Judge Lewis Kaplan [Sunday] morning rejected Donald Trump's request for an emergency stay on the collection of the $83.3 million dollar judgment won by E. Jean Carroll against him. Trump was asking the court for a delay pending post trial motions and appeals.
"In rejecting the motion, the court noted that Trump waited 25 days after the judgment was filed to make his request right before the deadline for Carroll's lawyers to begin attaching liens on his assets. The court also noted that he hasn't even filed any post trial motions yet, only a request to delay the collection of the judgment. Judge Kaplan rejected the request and ordered that briefs be submitted next week." (Source)
Last edited:
Is it too much to ask to not have a prosecution involving perjurious prosecutors doing the same thing as the accused is alleged of doing?
Friends with Benefits? Telephone Records Raise New Challenge to the Willis/Wade Testimony
In the movie Friends with Benefits, the character Jamie asks Dylan “why do I get the feeling this is the first real commitment you’ve ever made?” Dylan responds “It’s …
t.co
That's a fact. The more important fact for Trump is the stay was denied.
Only in a Leftist bizarro world will they try to confiscate money from someone who uses their first amendment right to profess their innocence against a rape allegation( which the jury agreed didn’t happen) and criminally prosecute the victim of a shakedown and not the extortionist.
Last edited: