danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
Biden is now a year later going to east Palestine, ohio even pete buttigieg is a better person because he went what 2 days after....
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
You're just repeating points previously made. I'm not interested in talking in circles. You have had your say, and so has the jury. End of story unless something new develops on appeal.
Trump: The blue collar worker candidate.
BREAKING: Trump J6 case REMOVED from DC court docket
The case, brought by special counsel Jack Smith and presided over by Judge Tanya Chutkan, currently has motions pending that are on appeal.
t.co
Last edited:
No, I'm asking questions that aren't being answered - in the media or anywhere else. And yes, we'll see how the appeals process turns out, but that will be after the election. But the NY Democrats got the verdict they wanted, and that's what matters to them. They Got Trump.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
MAGA hats for all.........................................................
Nope ... those are only for the "special" ones ...
Trump is not immune from prosecution in his 2020 election interference case, US appeals court says
Trump is not immune from prosecution in his 2020 election interference case, US appeals court says
A federal appeals court panel has ruled Donald Trump can face trial on charges he plotted to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
apnews.com
Notice how he keeps losing on the legal questions while trying to get delays on procedural issues. His court date do eventually come.
The Trump Organization tax fraud case eventually came and he lost. The two Carroll trials eventually came and he lost those too. Regarding his four criminal indictments, those court dates are closer than they have ever been. Trump cannot delay things forever.
Trump loses his cases in court because he actually committed the crimes he was charged with. When the trials eventually come, Trump is doomed to lose.
Last edited:
1. The appeals court affirmed the Chutkan ruling and eviscerated all defenses offered by Trump. The Supreme Court will note this as they consider taking up this case or not.
2. The three-judge decision was unanimous. The panel includes one "staunch conservative" judge. Those conservative views are part of the ruling.
3. The appeals court stripped Trump of delay tactics. They ruled quickly. They also said that if Trump asks for a hearing by the full appeals court (en banc), it will not delay the case from being heard by Judge Chutkan. The lower court trial will be allowed to continue as the en banc hearing proceeds.
4. The appeals court gave Trump until Monday to appeal to SCOTUS. Normally the window to appeal to SCOTUS is 90 days. On to Trumps abuse of the courts, The appeals court reduced the window to just a few days.
5. If Trump appeals to the Supreme Court (expected), SCOTUS will decide to take the case or not, and to stay Chutkan's activities or not. We don't know what, SCOTUS will do. My GUESS is they will not take up the case. Instead, they will quickly kick it back to Chutkan's court. That's because chances of Trump's appeal success are zero. His case has no legal merit. There is no controversy to resolve. The national precedent has already been set by the DC Court of Appeals, which is the second-highest court in the land. There is no need for SCOTUS to further act.
That's pretty much it for Trump. Except for appealing to SCOTUS, Trump's delay tactics are used up. Baring any further delays provided by SCOTUS, the case will resume in Chutkan's court.
Finally, if SCOTUS does provide a delay for Trump, DA Bragg is ready to proceed with his criminal felony case against Trump in March.
Last edited:
So in other words, Trump is down for the count and the FBI will not be rumaging through Trumps family undewear....and on with open borders and more of the same old same old.....So what will we all do with Harris......she as goofy as daffy duck...oh, wait, forgot about old Joe
There are no other words, unless you want to change the subject. The word today is the DC Court of Appeals dealt Trump a major defeat and a scathing, unanimous opinion that eviscerates the legal arguments Trump would take to the US Supreme Court, if they decide to take the case, and that's a big if.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Not down yet ... but the window for The Mango Manchurian Candidate's salvation is closing.
There are classified investigations which are ongoing ... one of which was recently referenced in the Columbian Traitor's courtroon.
So all bets are off as to whose underwear drawers the Fed's might be rummaging through.
The borders aren't "open".
Probably don't want to go there ...
Jus' sayin' ...
It may be all over but the crying. The MSNBC lawyers I listen to (Katyal and Weissmann, because they usually turn out to be right) are predicting that the US Supreme Court will quickly deny Trump's request for a stay and it will not hear Trump's appeal.
At present, Judge Chutkan has suspended activities on this case pending the results of Trump's appeals. Trump just lost at the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. His last chance for a reversal of Chutkan's immunity ruling or a delay is with the Supreme Court. If these lawyers are correct, and SCOTUS denies Trump's requests, Chutkan will reactivate the case and the trial will conclude before the November election.
Another path has been suggested. In that scenario, SCOTUS accepts the case but denies the stay. In that event, Chutkan would also reactivate the case and the trial would conclude before the November election.
Some say SCOTUS might do this because the immunity question is one of great historical importance, and one that has not been considered by SCOTUS before. For that reason, the Supreme Court justices may feel the need to put the SCOTUS stamp of approval on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling by affirming it.
Various other scenarios have been suggested. The two most likely scenarios are described above.
BTW, there are nine justices on the US Supreme Court. To grant Trump's request for a SCOTUS hearing, four justices must vote yes. To stay the trial in Chutkan's courtroom, five votes are needed.
Last edited:
Karma
Trump is said to be having difficulty finding a surety company to post the bond required to cover his appeal in the $83.3 million E. Gene Carroll case. That's because he used the powers of the presidency to shield himself from civil liability. That's how he managed to delay the Carroll case for so long. Bonding companies are reluctant to fund a bond that size for someone who may be re-elected, stiff the bonding company, and leave them powerless to do anything about it until he again leaves office.
In this case, the chickens are coming home to roost. Trump may eventually find a surety company but if he does, the terms are likely to be harsh.
Trump is said to be having difficulty finding a surety company to post the bond required to cover his appeal in the $83.3 million E. Gene Carroll case. That's because he used the powers of the presidency to shield himself from civil liability. That's how he managed to delay the Carroll case for so long. Bonding companies are reluctant to fund a bond that size for someone who may be re-elected, stiff the bonding company, and leave them powerless to do anything about it until he again leaves office.
In this case, the chickens are coming home to roost. Trump may eventually find a surety company but if he does, the terms are likely to be harsh.
What is the source for this? How does Jason Smith know this to be true? I tried to verify it with online searches and found nothing.