Please refrain from personal attacks.You're an apologist for Trump.
Thank you.
Please refrain from personal attacks.You're an apologist for Trump.
Look, if you can't defend her, just say so. There's no reason to try and make this thread about me.You're an apologist for Trump.
We rate Fiorina’s statement Mostly True.
Says Donald Trump was "forced to file for bankruptcy not once, not twice, four times."
In a debate. – Wednesday, September 16, 2015
A person who offer argument defending a controversial person is an apologist. What personal about that?
Not necessarily. And in point of fact, I haven't once defended Trump in this thread. I've defended against blatant ignorance, mischaracterizatons, fabricated quotes, and beliefs presented as fact. I've defended some of the things Trump had said in the context of the issue at hand. But I haven't defended Trump at all. The fact that I haven't espoused vitriol and hatred towards the man is hardly the same as defending him.A person who offer argument defending a controversial person is an apologist.
Instead of defending Hillary as asked, you responded by attacking me personally. Using "you're" can only be interpretated as being directed squarely at me, when I'm not even the topic of the thread. Why would you do that?What personal about that?
Someone who steps on backs to accomplish things, or someone who stabs people in the back to accomplish things... tough choice.
His shirts are made in Bangladesh. Regardless, where do you think they should be made? Before you knee-jerk with "Here in America!" you first need to find an existing US supplier who can manufacture the shirts to spec and in quantity, and at a price point that is financially viable. That's easier said than done.
If Ford wants a new part for a vehicle they don't just build a new manufacturing facility to build that part. They look for an existing supplier who can supply the part. If no US suppliers can do it, then the part gets made elsewhere. Shirts are exactly the same.
Why are you and so many other people concerned about what Trump says but don't care in the least about what Clinton has done and failed to do?I could type out all the crazy crap he has said in the past year but I don't have four hours to spare. At this point I'm less concerned about what his comments mean, I don't even think he knows what he's saying half the time. And I'm not really concerned what "they" say he means. I'm more concerned as to why he can't stop himself from saying the stuff in the first place. He definitely does a lot of talking before thinking.
Why are you and so many other people concerned about what Trump says but don't care in the least about what Clinton has done and failed to do?
If I vote for Trump in November this would be the main factor in my decision. Especially considering the GOP Stalwarts are against him....and I think he scares the daylights out of both parties if he gets in. I think the latter has been long overdue.
The fact that the Washington Establishment, the Republicans in particular, don't want Trump to be president, is perhaps the most compelling argument that he should be the next president. The Establishment wants someone who will play ball, be it Rubio, Bush, or even Clinton. Look at how many established Republicans are saying they prefer Clinton over Trump. There's a reason for that, and it's not because Trump is dangerous, or crazy, or unqualified... or they all suddenly shifted their views to the left. It's because he can't be bought and he won't take his marching orders from those who want to rule by proxy. Clinton has already proved she can be bought and is literally campaigning on doubling down on the status quo, she is part and parcel of the Establishment.Personally even though trump isn't anything to get excited about I'm very pleased we have someone who isn't a politician. They aren't going to change without being shown we are tired of their crap.
<Crickets>Can I get a like from every conservative in this thread that has had the thought (if only Paul Ryan was our candidate)???