More than some disagree.Largely inapplicable to the points I raised in the post that you were replying to.
Just more obfuscation and deflection.
#SAD!
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
They can "disagree" all they want.
The bottomline is that what matters is the outcome in the courts.
Presidents have different rules . I’m sorry that some can’t accept that, but it’s in the constitution.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Top Republican defends Trump taking classified doc to Mar-a-Lago
The top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said he would not have taken classified documents, but defended former President Donald Trump because he has a 'different set of rules.'
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
And if the court rules in favor for trump don't cry because he will be president again.They can "disagree" all they want.
The bottomline is that what matters is the outcome in the courts.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
That's good as a rando comment ... was there something specific that you were wanting it to apply to ?
Let me know if there's anyone you find actually disputing something that's actually in the Constitution.
Last edited:
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Trump usually loses in court. Even when he appeals cases to the U.S. Supreme Court, where there is a conservative majority of justices and three of them were appointed by Trump himself, he loses there too.
Why do you think that is?
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Possibly the Deep State, George Soros, or Antifa ?
Or maybe all three ?
"Q" will probably tell us very soon ...
Looks like the case had merit after all.
"In addition to being deprived of potentially significant personal documents, which alone creates a real harm, plaintiff faces an unquantifiable potential harm by way of improper disclosure of sensitive information to the public,” Cannon wrote in her ruling."
Judge grants Trump’s motion to appoint special master in Mar-a-Lago FBI raid
A federal judge on Monday granted former President Donald Trump’s request to appoint a special master to review the trove of documents seized during the FBI’s raid of Mar-a-Lago last month.
nypost.com
Last edited:
"In June 2016, USA Today published an analysis of litigation involving Donald Trump, which found that over the previous three decades Trump and his businesses had been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal and state courts, an unprecedented number for a U.S. presidential candidate. Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150. Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court. Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983. In the 1,300 cases where the record establishes the outcome, Trump settled 175 times, lost 38, won 450, and had another 137 cases end with some other outcome. In the other 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs' claims against Trump."
Soooo, of the 1300 cases where the record establishes a disposition, Trump lost 38 of them.
The Trump administration only won 47% of its Supreme Court cases, so maybe that's what you mean by usually. Ever since the high mark of 75% during Reagan the Supreme Court has had a downward trend of less and less broad deference to Presidents.
Clinton 64%
Jr Busch 62%
Obama 52%
Trump 47%
Now we know the judge is working over the long weekend. She issued her ruling today, Labor Day.
For now, yes. The judge ruled in Trump's favor. Now we wait to see if DOJ will appeal and if it does, what that result will be.
If DOJ does not appeal, the investigation will continue as before, except for the new rules that now apply to the items seized in the Mar-a-Lago search.
If DOJ does appeal, the investigation will continue as before, except for the new rules that now apply to the items seized in the Mar-a-Lago search, which will remain in effect unless the appeals court overrules the District Court.
Last edited:
And?
I lost power to my house, but the Tree trimmers are here working today on Labor Day cutting down branches and putting new lines up.
She may be a hardworking judge is all.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Yes ... it will be interesting to see if DOJ appeals.
On the one hand they have the law and existing precedent on their side.
On the other hand, the 11th Circuit is not exactly you'd pick if you had your choice among others.
True.
Also true.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
So easily #triggered ...
Oh ... she's certainly hardworking alright ... but that isn't all.
She went out of her way to act as Trump's defense lawyer, making arguments his attorney's hadn't even made, similar to what the now-disgraced Cover Up General did who was proven to be a liar, and jumped through all sorts of hoops - including ignoring precedent - to arrive at a tortured ruling ... finding for the guy who nominated her to the bench.
Interestingly, those who claim to be so concerned about #BIASSSS!!! never called for her to recuse herself.
What does Asha have to say?So easily #triggered ...
Oh ... she's certainly hardworking alright ... but that isn't all.
She went out of her way to act as Trump's defense lawyer, making arguments his attorney's hadn't even made, similar to what the now-disgraced Cover Up General did who was proven to be a liar, and jumped through all sorts of hoops - including ignoring precedent - to arrive at a tortured ruling ... finding for the guy who nominated her to the bench.
Interestingly, those who claim to be so concerned about #BIASSSS!!! never called for her to recuse herself.
