RLENT
Veteran Expediter
That's a fact Jack.
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
That's a fact Jack.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
So basically Lindell's My Pillow Ads, Alex Jones' "Man-Boosting" supplements, and Jim Baker's Emergency Buckets-o-Food ?
Not hardly. What Biden did was interfere with a foreign country's investigation of a corrupt energy company who just happened to have his unqualified son on their board of directors, paying him $83.3K per month. This was influence peddling and power brokering for monetary gain at the highest levels.
Biden Pressured Ukraine to Fire Prosecutor After Burisma Lobbying Effort
Joe Biden's pressuring of Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor came after Burisma Holdings lobbied the Obama White House.
www.breitbart.com
That’s all the DoJ has been doing is speaking through their favorite “news”papers by leaking.
The (local ?) rule is ya only get 20 pages.
AG Garland has said that DOJ will speak through it's filings in court ... and not in the media (which is the opposite of Trump has been doing)
Looks like this one might be a doozy ...
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
What Biden did was quid pro quo which is what they claimed trump did with Ukraine.......
Oh, lookie here:
In the tradition of McCabe and Stryk.
beckernews.com
In the tradition of McCabe and Stryk.
FBI Special Agent Who Opened Trump Investigation Has Been Escorted out of Bureau Headquarters
An FBI Special Agent who has a track record of mishandling politically sensitive investigations has resigned and was escorted out of the bureau’s headquarters, according to reports surfacing on Monday afternoon. “A senior FBI official in the bureau’s Washington field office has abruptly resigned...
beckernews.com
Last edited:
Oh lookie here! Oh, lookie there. Oh, lookie at Hillary, Hunter, Obama, the FBI, Biden, the Democrats, the magistrate!
Oh lookie everywhere, except at Trump, the crimes named, and the evidence collected.
Last edited:
I don't think the short bus was running the day that was covered.Maybe time to expand your knowledge horizons ?
The Crime-Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege
Evidence collected illegally. Pesky facts
What could go wrong?
freebeacon.com
Meet the Conspiracy Theorist Advising Joe Biden on the Intelligence Community
President Joe Biden’s pick for an intelligence advisory post falsely claimed that Hunter Biden’s laptop was part of a Russian disinformation campaign and that Donald Trump's campaign colluded with the Kremlin.
freebeacon.com
“Find me the man and I’ll twist and concoct a crime”
thefederalist.com
Mar-A-Lago Affidavit Proves DOJ Fished For A Crime To Get Trump
Manipulating the criminal code to find a basis to search the home of a political enemy is a weaponization of the criminal justice system.
thefederalist.com
The ends justify the means apparently:
FBI’s Trump Raid Should Concern Everyone, Including His Critics
If the FBI can so easily obtain the right to raid Trump’s home, what is left to protect you, your home, or your privacy?
thefederalist.com
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
The problem is the Democrats see absolutely nothing wrong with the raid on mar largo.....
As the song goes “Regrets, there a few.”
justthenews.com
Retired FBI boss disassembles Trump search warrant: Feds ‘going to regret this’
Retired Assistant Director Kevin Brock says FBI didn't exhaust other means or appear to have established probable cause for search.
justthenews.com
Should Hillary be in jail for her crimes? Absolutely. Should Hunter be in jail for his drug crimes? Absolutely. Still trying to figure out what Obama did to deserve to be in jail......
The difference is evidence., Trump was caught with his red handed.
A true American would see nothing wrong with it either, because nobody is above the law.
Evidence collected legally under a court-issued and properly executed search warrant. You don't get to make up your own facts. Trump has had plenty of chances to challenge the legality of the search in court. Nothing so far in that regard. The search was legal when done and remains legal now.
Think about this for a moment. After the search, the DOJ asked the court to unseal the warrant. Trump did not oppose that. After the warrant and the inventory was unsealed, Trump took no action to challenge the legality of the search. Two weeks after the search, Trump went to a judge to ask for a special master, but in that filing he did not challenge the legality of the search.
If Trump himself is not challenging the legality of the search in court, why are you challenging it in this forum? If the search was in fact illegal, why would Trump remain silent in court about that?
In his usual fashion, he's beating his chest and making lots of noise in venues that help him raise money on this hot issue, but in court, he is not challenging the legality of the search.
The the actions of the courts and Trump himself seem to suggest the search was indeed legal.
Last edited:
Why did they seek out the biased anti Trump Magistrate instead of an article 3 Federal judge?
Why didn’t they include a Office Of Legal Council opinion in their affidavit?
A shady way to do it.
I don't know the answer to your questions. Nor do I think your questions are relevant. If they were relevant, Trump himself would raise them in court, would he not?
Why has Trump not raised in court the questions you are asking here?
Last edited: