The traitor driver

Mike99

Veteran Expediter
Couple months ago I had a small accident with my Ford cargo van.I had to change the driver door so the new door was without decalls. Last night my driver had a swap with an other van and after the swap the other driver called safety and report my van. Everything for a free dinner. Now the van is in Safety hold and I have to take it back in Oh to put the decalls.Safety told me today that if you see something like this and you call them ,you win a free meal. My question is how can be somebody so cheap and mean???To report an other driver for a meal....I hope God saw him....
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Why would you have to go all the way to Ohio to get a sticker put on?

I would tell them send it to me and I'll send you a picture.
 

Mike99

Veteran Expediter
The van was in PA so we decided that is faster to go in OH today and tonight the van will be in service.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I don't see how decals would be a safety issue...:confused:


If you only have decals on one side of your truck your loads will always be off balance, unless you compensate for it, and you will overturn in tight turns or fast reaction moves. (like avoiding a deer, or a bear or other such things) :eek:
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
If you only have decals on one side of your truck your loads will always be off balance, unless you compensate for it, and you will overturn in tight turns or fast reaction moves. (like avoiding a deer, or a bear or other such things) :eek:

Alrighty then.....that explains a lot!
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Leo, if you are driving a van and vans under 10k are not CMVs, why do you need DOT numbers?

I am gathering up truck numbers this morning, there is an E1 truck, FedEx truck and Panther, and now I will call each company and ask if they hand out free dinners if I see bad behavior. I hope they will give me a free dinner, I'm tired of truck stop food and BBQ.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Last I knew a commercial vehicle was a commercial vehicle whether it was governed by HOS or not. I haven't seen a van that didn't have the same set of numbers as the regulated trucks.
 

pjjjjj

Veteran Expediter
....Last night my driver had a swap with an other van and after the swap the other driver called safety and report my van. Everything for a free dinner.....

At first I thought this was pretty funny, and it made me think of that old post where 'expediters were going hungry.. for real', and thinking that it must have come to the point where some must be prostituting themselves for a free meal.

After giving it some thought, and trying to view it from the carrier's perspective, I was thinking it's not such a horrible idea. Here they have alllllllllll these trucks on the road representing their company, directly visible, and having face-to-face contact with their customers all over the country on a daily basis. They can't be everywhere to keep tabs on how their contractors are representing their business and their name.

I'm sure they (and every other carrier) must hear horror stories after the fact, when it's too late to do anything about. I'm sure they have even lost customers here and there along the way as a result of one thing or another that their contractors are or are not doing.

It's pretty ingenious to come up with a package like 'squeal for a meal', which would only cost them what? Eight bucks per squeal? Maybe ten? From their perspective, what better use of that $8 could there be? They can't hold a training session, buy advertising, hire a roaming watchdog, or discount an upset customer's bill for that price.

Not to diss the OP, but look how fast it brought him to take care of something which he probably knew the carrier would have wanted him to have taken care of a couple of months ago, had they known. Carriers have standards, some higher than others, and if standards are agreed to when signing on, I guess they have every right to do whatever they need to do to ensure they're met.

Welcome to office politics out on the road, and beware of the hungry :D
 

fastrod

Expert Expediter
Last I knew a commercial vehicle was a commercial vehicle whether it was governed by HOS or not. I haven't seen a van that didn't have the same set of numbers as the regulated trucks.

Vehicles 10,000# and under are not required to have any markings at all. As to why a carrier slaps all the decals on there vans it must be that they view them as rolling billboards.
 

eggd1ver

Seasoned Expediter
Vehicles 10,000# and under are not required to have any markings at all. As to why a carrier slaps all the decals on there vans it must be that they view them as rolling billboards.

You hit the nail on the head all you are is rolling billboard for the carrier you work for. It does not mean the job is done any better are faster. Safety issue hardly not!! Diver that does that for a few dollars does not know how to make enough money in this biss. so he or she has to take this route to feed him or herself these people do not need to be out here:mad:
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
It doesn't matter if the regulations don't require the numbers or if the driver is required to wear clown make up.

What matters is you derive your revenue by representing the company, and if you can not represent them as a brand that they are trying to promote the way they want you to but have some attitude about signs on your truck, maybe becoming independent and trying to do this work without their help is in order.
 

Mike99

Veteran Expediter
At first I thought this was pretty funny, and it made me think of that old post where 'expediters were going hungry.. for real', and thinking that it must have come to the point where some must be prostituting themselves for a free meal.

After giving it some thought, and trying to view it from the carrier's perspective, I was thinking it's not such a horrible idea. Here they have alllllllllll these trucks on the road representing their company, directly visible, and having face-to-face contact with their customers all over the country on a daily basis. They can't be everywhere to keep tabs on how their contractors are representing their business and their name.

I'm sure they (and every other carrier) must hear horror stories after the fact, when it's too late to do anything about. I'm sure they have even lost customers here and there along the way as a result of one thing or another that their contractors are or are not doing.

It's pretty ingenious to come up with a package like 'squeal for a meal', which would only cost them what? Eight bucks per squeal? Maybe ten? From their perspective, what better use of that $8 could there be? They can't hold a training session, buy advertising, hire a roaming watchdog, or discount an upset customer's bill for that price.

Not to diss the OP, but look how fast it brought him to take care of something which he probably knew the carrier would have wanted him to have taken care of a couple of months ago, had they known. Carriers have standards, some higher than others, and if standards are agreed to when signing on, I guess they have every right to do whatever they need to do to ensure they're met.

I did not say anything about the carrier.My issue was with the female van driver who prostitute herself for a meal.
I thought drivers should helps each other.....
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Some of you may be confusing the optional large company logo signs that go on the vehicle with the mandatory DOT/MC number signage that must be present on both sides of every CMV operating under a DOT authority.
 
Top