Nor should there be any thing done. The repubs know it is not an issue as some make it out to be.
Obama Didn't Win - ROMNEY LOST!
- Thread starter Pilgrim
- Start date
Nor should there be any thing done. The repubs know it is not an issue as some make it out to be.
108% of the vote in one county, assuming it's true, is not a issue? 
Several districts where Obama won 100% of the vote is not an issue? There are a LOT of shinanigans going on out there. All illegal and all meant to subvert the voting process and take power away from the People and give it to an illegal government.
Several districts where Obama won 100% of the vote is not an issue? There are a LOT of shinanigans going on out there. All illegal and all meant to subvert the voting process and take power away from the People and give it to an illegal government.
Can't assume it's true, considering the source.
Even the photo was obviously photoshopped.
Not saying it is or is not true. I, however, do not trust Obama, or anyone in this government and would put NOTHING past them. They cannot be trusted as far as one could throw the tons of manure that they spread around every day.
I have repeated that 10 times and it still doesn't make sense.
I believe there was a 3 million vote difference in the popular vote for President and many state races were very close.
How do you blow off 40% of the population that is pro choice and 12 to 36 million voters who do not support a ban on gay marriage??
So ignore those statistics and go with the Fox News conclusion that 43 million Americans have absolutely no dreams or aspirations to improve themselves and that is the simple answer?
Well, lets see how that works out.
WIthout a doubt the republican party better get a grip on how to address those issues, or like you said, try to kick them to them state level. But I think it is much more involved than that. A poor immigration policy and calling it what it is, they totally ignored minorities. Big mistake.
But I am mindful that this election wasn't a landslide and the republicans still hold the House.
Now that might change, but will have to see. As for the Senate, they deserved to lose by putting total idiots up there starting with the Akin character. Had they even had semi-acceptable candidates, they might have had a chance.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
That you would cite this article is actually pretty scary, in light of your claimed professional background ... but not entirely surprising, given your propensity to histrionics.
Anything off FrontPage ought to be considered dubious at best, until shown to be otherwise.
The article is misleading on it's face - particularly the "headline" - in terms of what actually happened - a fact rather easily discerned - if one bothers to check the election results at either the Woods County BoE or the Ohio SoS websites:
Woods County BOE: GEMS Election Results
The BOE website linked above, shows that Obama received 31,596 votes out of a total of 62,069 votes cast - according to my calculator, that would represent 50.9% of the vote.
Evidently the calculator that the boys over at FrontPage use works differently.
So how did the author of the article come up with the 108% figure ?
Here's how:
The 108% figure is a (unsupportable) claim that the number of registered voters (108,014) in Woods County - not those that actually voted in the election, mind you - is 108% of how many registered voters there actually should be.
And how exactly does the author divine this little factoid ?
Well, he uses 2 year-old census figures (which put the estimate of registered voters somewhere in the neighborhood of 106,000)
Of course, that totally fails to take into account the fact that Woods County is home to Bowling Green University - a school with an enrollment of 17,700 - whose students may not have been reflected in the 2 year-old census figures - which are estimated - of registered voters - but who could have registered and then voted in the election.
The article is complete and total crap.
Last edited:
Humble2drive
Expert Expediter
Those idiots (Akin, Murdock, etc.) were doing well until the abortion statements hit the press.
Funny thing is that they were dead on in line with the Republican Party platform of no exceptions.
Others kept their mouths shut and fared much better.
Oh, you can be pretty darn sure it's true. The part you have to really doubt is that Chicago democrats only cheated 108% worth and not more.
Forgive him, for he is from Texas.
Last edited:
Another place the republican party has to adjust or change their message.
So do the Demoncrats. Abortion, and ALL other social issues, are NOT Federal matters. Those things are reserved to the People and the States. The Demoncrats forcing abortions is just a vile as the Rumbumlicans trying to outlaw them on a national basis. SAMO SAMO
Partial birth abortions too. Them Dems can be some sick puppies sometimes.
Social issues are State issues. Better yet, local issues. The Federal government should mind their own dang gum business. They are SO out of control.
You must have fallen prey to the MSM propaganda machine for the Obama campaign. Even Factcheck.org states that the GOP platform leaves this issue up to Congress and the states.
"The Republican Party’s 2012 platform calls for a ban on abortion, but is silent on exceptions — leaving that decision up to Congress and the states. However, as FactCheck.org Director Brooks Jackson tells WCBS radio, the Obama campaign falsely claims the GOP platform calls for banning abortions even in cases of rape or incest."
FactCheck.org : GOP Platform on Abortion
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Well, let's see if can help him to avoid falling prey to Turkey Choker cherry-picking and spin while we're about it.
Here's part of what you didn't quote from Factcheck.org:
Kinda hard to imagine one would be making "exceptions" when there is "a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed ..." involved ...
So many Republicans have a genius for shooting themselves in the foot every time they open their mouths, I almost feel sorry for them.
Nah, not really. Just like Romney & Ryan [Dumb & Dumber, IMO] they truly have no idea how wrong they are regarding what matters to the majority of American citizens.
Irony: those whose 'charitable donations' are made only when they get something in return [golf tournament, dinner, exclusive event] plus a tax credit for it, calling the unemployed [who by definition have proven themselves not guilty of contributing to the job loss in any way] 'gimme goobers' because they can't provide for their families without an income, and [in case they haven't noticed], jobs are scarce and don't pay enough to keep a hamster alive. [But hey, they can work 2 or 3: problem solved!]
Seriously: when people say 'entitlement mentality', it's 100% projection, IMO.
Nah, not really. Just like Romney & Ryan [Dumb & Dumber, IMO] they truly have no idea how wrong they are regarding what matters to the majority of American citizens.
Irony: those whose 'charitable donations' are made only when they get something in return [golf tournament, dinner, exclusive event] plus a tax credit for it, calling the unemployed [who by definition have proven themselves not guilty of contributing to the job loss in any way] 'gimme goobers' because they can't provide for their families without an income, and [in case they haven't noticed], jobs are scarce and don't pay enough to keep a hamster alive. [But hey, they can work 2 or 3: problem solved!]
Seriously: when people say 'entitlement mentality', it's 100% projection, IMO.
Humble2drive
Expert Expediter
What would be " a good percentage" and how do you determine it?
Is there a survey somewhere? Or is this just based on your experience?
What is the definition of entitlement mentality?
Just seems like you should provide some evidence for what you are saying before you throw the dumb word out there.