The purpose of orientation is to give the drivers all the information with which to make them a success, both to themselves and to Panther. Clearly, orientation failed in this case.
I would have to disagree. None of the other drivers in this class experienced these difficulties. The necessary information was presented but apparently not absorbed by this driver.
Be that as it may, Panther had a choice to continue to offer him loads and let him turn them down, a prospect that would not be good for all parties involved, or they could bring him back in for clarification, discussion and additional orientation and training.
Something we agree on.
Soon as they pulled the trigger on placing him OOS, they took on that responsibility. Problem is, it wasn't their time that was gonna be wasted for two days, so that wasn't really a problem for them, was it?
Something we don't agree on. When did we absolve individuals of all responsibilities for their own actions? Why do you assume that no one talked to the guy and tried to work with him on Saturday then came to the conclusion he required a higher level of intervention? Based on the quick load offers I'm guessing we could have used that truck. An effort was made to salvage his weekend. I also don't agree that someone should have been called in. Let the firestorm begin I guess, but the people on this side of the business deserve their time off as much as anyone else.