Little Hitlers on parade in Ohio

[cheri1122]

Sorry guys, being a vet has nothing to do with it regardless how you want to spin it.

The Vietnam vets were not the only ones who got crapped on but the funny thing is that they got crapped on by other vets when they got home too.

For some, it's like being black, and assuming everything that happens is a result of racism that happened 20 years ago, but they just can't move on. Reliving the outrage, nursing the injustice, never missing a chance to insist that society owes them now for the actions of long ago....

The cop should be reprimanded for his actions, lights and sirens are to be used in only cases where it warrants it, this was not the case. If you want to know what happens when you play cop with lights on, look up what happened in Detroit in I think '91 and how the cops escorting a car ended up in a bad accident, killing two kids.

I had a cop abuse his lights & siren once, while following me [in the truck] out the long winding road from a rest area: he used them to get me to pull over, then he turned them off and cruised onto the interstate at normal speed.
Using lights and/or sirens for a personal reason is abuse of power, and those LEOs are the kind that will abuse their power in other ways, too.

I'm with Monger, eliminate the local and state police, have elected officials running the place and accountability may return.

 

[Pilgrim]

Unfortunately, these clowns are everywhere among the general population. Although we all agree they shouldn't be in any position of authority or responsibility, who put them there in the first place? Who allows them to stay there once their true colors are known? There are some incompetent supervisors that need to be replaced along with this cop.

 

[AMonger]

Unfortunately, these clowns are everywhere among the general population. Although we all agree they shouldn't be in any position of authority or responsibility, who put them there in the first place? Who allows them to stay there once their true colors are known?

The union, for one. Notice how the union guy defended the rogue cop by calling it an isolated incident, when, in fact, this is the 16th or 17th such IA investigation on this tyrant, and he's had however many complaints in addition to that. Shouldn't the union rep have said, "No way am I making any statements on your behalf. You're lucky I don't arrest you myself." Instead, he defends the guy in front of the press.

Just one more piece of evidence that the barrel is bad, not just a couple of the apples in it.

 

[july107]

hello,it's very happy to come here.

 

[AMonger]

Sorry guys, being a vet has nothing to do with it regardless how you want to spin it.

Lots of people, including those sometimes referred to as the D12, view government workers as "above" the rest of us, though I'm sure if you asked them, they'd deny out, and many probably don't even realize that they do. Yet they slobber all over cops & firemen, go around conspicuously thanking veterans for their service, etc. This, the approval of a cop giving an escort to a veteran because he's a veteran, is another sign.

I was watching a TV show the other day on which the story of a woman who was bitten by a venomous snake was shown. The doctors were afraid they were going to have to amputate her arm.

Her husband was in the waiting room, anxious to go into the treatment room and comfort his wife, but the staff kept him out. As his agitation grew, the ER called security to come watch him and keep him out of their way. When the guard got there, he somehow perceived that this guy was a cop and asked him. The guy says yes, he used to be a cop. So the guard, who was called to keep this guy out of the treatment room, escorts him in so he can hold his wife's hand, apparently after feeling some kinship with him because he used to be a cop. Yet, if it were you or me, he'd be watching us to keep us out. Some privilege, huh?

You know in some jurisdictions, police K9s are viewed as "K9 officers" and have greater protection than you or me? By that, I mean the penalty for, say, kicking one is greater than the penalty for kicking a regular citizen.

Instead of being held to a higher standard, cops are given elevated status on many different levels.

 

[tbubster]

"Eliminate the local and state police,have elected officials running the place and accuntability may return"


yeah, this would work.Because it is working so well in washington and at state levels now anyway right?Having elected officials decideing whats good for us right.You know because elected official are so trustful!!Im sure that there are many in goverment who would like it this way most of all the man in the white house right now.Never mind the fact that if you really look at how the laws are made and enforced the elected officials already do run it.

 

[layoutshooter]

"For some, it's like being black, and assuming everything that happens is a result of racism that happened 20 years ago, but they just can't move on. Reliving the outrage, nursing the injustice, never missing a chance to insist that society owes them now for the actions of long ago...."

You mean like the "Women's Rights" bunch? You know, the women of the United States demanding "equal rights" but NOT wanting to accept "equal responsibility" like facing the military draft which they have NEVER had to do. Sort like that?

I remember NOT getting hired for one job because they needed to hire women. Yeah, good idea, hire those who DON'T have to serve before those who DID serve.

 

[Dakota]

"For some, it's like being black, and assuming everything that happens is a result of racism that happened 20 years ago, but they just can't move on. Reliving the outrage, nursing the injustice, never missing a chance to insist that society owes them now for the actions of long ago...."

You mean like the "Women's Rights" bunch? You know, the women of the United States demanding "equal rights" but NOT wanting to accept "equal responsibility" like facing the military draft which they have NEVER had to do. Sort like that?

I remember NOT getting hired for one job because they needed to hire women. Yeah, good idea, hire those who DON'T have to serve before those who DID serve.

Why do women need rights, they are already always right

 

[layoutshooter]

Why do women need rights, they are already always right

LOL!! I would not touch that one with a 10' pole!!

 

[Dakota]

LOL!! I would not touch that one with a 10' pole!!

Smart man
Something I learned from being married

 

[AMonger]

It wouldn't be the same as Washington national politics at all, in which different factions are trying to elect 535 legislators who will appoint who-knows-how-many bureaucrats. This is a matter of electing ONE executive. If he tolerates corruption or police brutality, he's not going to be re-elected.

How about a twist on that theme? Instead of having the citizens elect a sheriff, have the mayor appoint one, like they hire police chiefs now, but have mandatory recall elections on every ballot. That way, the mayor initially decides, but the people have a way to override it. That's not quite as good as an elected sheriff, but it would spare us all the political ads, and it would be better than unelected cops policing themselves (or NOT policing themselves, actually).

 

[AMonger]

"For some, it's like being black, and assuming everything that happens is a result of racism that happened 20 years ago, but they just can't move on. Reliving the outrage, nursing the injustice, never missing a chance to insist that society owes them now for the actions of long ago...."

You mean like the "Women's Rights" bunch? You know, the women of the United States demanding "equal rights" but NOT wanting to accept "equal responsibility" like facing the military draft which they have NEVER had to do. Sort like that?

I remember NOT getting hired for one job because they needed to hire women. Yeah, good idea, hire those who DON'T have to serve before those who DID serve.

You're doing it again--trying to get special status in society for having served in the military.

Just stop it. You're due no special status for having been in the military. Some recognition on Veterans Day, maybe, but certainly no job preference.

You complain because somebody from one group was hired over you because they exercised a preference for her group over yours. How about we just treat EVERYBODY as INDIVIDUALS instead of as groups? That would end all the bean counting and complaints.

 

[Tennesseahawk]

Sorry, AMonger... but that would end affirmative action. And affirmative action is BIG business!

 

[AMonger]

It's more likely the unions who would prevent that change. Union extortion depends on the government forcing employers to treat them as a group.

 

[cheri1122]

"For some, it's like being black, and assuming everything that happens is a result of racism that happened 20 years ago, but they just can't move on. Reliving the outrage, nursing the injustice, never missing a chance to insist that society owes them now for the actions of long ago...."

You mean like the "Women's Rights" bunch? You know, the women of the United States demanding "equal rights" but NOT wanting to accept "equal responsibility" like facing the military draft which they have NEVER had to do. Sort like that?

I remember NOT getting hired for one job because they needed to hire women. Yeah, good idea, hire those who DON'T have to serve before those who DID serve.

I first wanted to drive a truck more than 20 years ago, but lacking a husband /boyfriend to drive with, NO ONE would hire me. But have you ever heard me whine about how unfair that was, even once?
I appreciate what the military does for us, but lets be real: not every one of them had or has such pure motives - in fact, some are no better than the worst LEO on a power trip. [Tailhook ring a bell?]
Vets deserve exactly what they were promised in writing when they signed on the dotted line [for whatever reason] - no more and no less.
They don't deserve sainthood, or genuflection from every citizen they 'served', any more than anyone else who did/does the job they agreed to do, whatever it is.

 

[chefdennis]

Sooo...Back to the pos cop in the video in the OP...this guy is a real piece of work...yet another video has surfaced of him threatening to kill there " **'ers", I mean citizens....

There are 3 videos at the link before, including this new one and the other that started this...

Crime ‘I’ll Kill Every One of You *************!’
Second Explosive Canton Cop Video Emerges

Posted on August 1, 2011 at 10:48am
by Jonathon M. Seidl
Canton Cop Daniel Harless Caught on Video Making Death Threats Again | Video | TheBlaze.com

• Canton, OH officer Daniel Harless caught again on video threatening to kill citizens during a traffic stop.
  
• Latest video actually took place in July 2010.
  
• Some similarities to incident that surfaced last month, when he threatened to kill a concealed carry gun owner.
• Suspect says he was “freaked out.”
  
• Police chief is investigating both incidents.

“I’ll kill every one of you *************!”

That’s how a second alleged video of now-infamous Canton, OH Cop Daniel Harless, who was caught on video released earlier this month threatening to kill a legal concealed carry gun owner, starts

In the new video, an officer who looks and sounds like Harless, can be heard threatening a group of people during another traffic stop. The time stamp on the dash cam says the video is from July 29, 2010. In it, as in the last one, the officer is upset after finding a gun in the car. Unlike the last incident, however, it’s believed those involved in the 2010 did not have a permit for the weapon.

But while the details surrounding the incidents are not identical, it does appear Harless is starting to show a pattern of losing his temper when it comes to arrests, and even recycling some of the same death threats.

“You fu**ing move and I’ll shoot you in the head!” he can be heard yelling, which is similar to a line used in the first video.

“I’ll send you both to the grave!” he continues. “Do not fu**ing move a muscle or I’ll put you in the grave.”

“Now I’ll tell you what motherfu**er, I’ll shoot you in the face and go to sleep tonight.” Later he says, “you move and I will shoot you,“ and ”get the fu** out before I shoot you.”

The Canton Repository reports that the officer in both videos has been identified as Harless, and that the new video was released after it requested the 2010 footage.

The Repository has more details from the 2010 stop, including that the suspect in that date’s video pled guilty to a gun charge:

Harless pulled his weapon and ordered — in profanity laced language — the man and woman in the back seat not to move or he would shoot.

[...]

In his report on the incident, Harless wrote that the man looked as if he was trying to make a decision whether to pick up the gun or leave it alone, and that he yelled several orders to the man that he and the woman would be shot if she kept moving around.

The man and woman were eventually removed from the truck. The gun, a .25-caliber semi-automatic pistol, was found loaded with a round in the chamber, according to police reports.

The man with the gun at his feet pleaded guilty in March to improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle, a felony, and was placed on probation.

According to the Repository, no one filed a complaint with internal affairs. However, internal affairs has now opened up an investigation into the second incident.

“I was freaked out,” Anthony Leone said. “The whole time he’s telling me he’s going to blow my brains out if I move.”

The local police chief said the results of both investigations will be forwarded on at the appropriate time. But he‘s being much more cautious about the second video considering the suspect didn’t have the proper permission to carray a gun in a car:

“The fact that the incident from last year involved an illegal gun and not a concealed-carry license made it a ‘much more dangerous situation to the officers and the officers would have to react in a much more professionally forceful and focused way,’ McKimm said.”

 

[AMonger]

Sooo...Back to the pos cop in the video in the OP...this guy is a real piece of work...yet another video has surfaced of him threatening to kill there " **'ers", I mean citizens....

There are 3 videos at the link before, including this new one and the other that started this...

Contrary to what the article says, there's no such thing as an illegal gun, certainly not the way we understand the word gun. Nor is there an illegal way of carrying it, so-called laws to the contrary notwithstanding.

Does everybody realize just how ineffectual a .25 is? Those incidents in which someone ribs a liquor store and fires a shot or two on the way out, and later somebody sees the clerk is bleeding and has to point out to him that he's been shot--those are usually .25 wounds, and that's what this dip•••• Is threatening to put people in the grave over.

This is one of the evils of unions; Harless and his partner should have been fired almost immediately after the first video wa discovered--certainly within 72 hours--and Harless should be awaiting trial by now for aggravated assault and terroristic threats, among other things. But his buddies at the union hall have his back.

Anybody defending this tyrant is an enemy of America.