Horse hockey."Profanity is a weak mind attempting to express it's self."
Horse hockey."Profanity is a weak mind attempting to express it's self."
Horse hockey.
Sometimes I go over to the High School to pick up my grandsons. While waiting in the lot with the windows down , you can hear a lot more than the F word and to me it is a sad state we are in already. Yes, I'm getting old, because in the 60s, we ,me, the big bad high schoolers used the same words. Now I see the use of constant cussing as a loss of decency everywhere. Yes, cussing is done frequently in the military too. But with the government wanting to make it live and in your face and your kids,,my omy...................
I was taught in both grade school and high school and in SOME, not all, of my college classes that excessive cussing was often a sign of a weak vocabulary and almost always a sign of rudeness. That is what I was taught. Don't know what that has to do with horses or hockey though.
"Profanity is a weak mind attempting to express it's self."
You'd have to define "excessive." Often, a well placed, properly used profanity can correctly convey a message like no euphemism or alternate phrasing could ever hope to. Like when Clark Gable uttered, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a dаmn" at the end of 'Gone With the Wind.' Any other phrasing would have fallen woefully short.
A more recent example, and one with an even bigger impact, was when David Ortiz capped off an emotional pregame ceremony at Fenway Park the day after the second Boston Marathon Bomber was captured. No one classified it as a weak mind trying to express itself, the mark of a weak vocabulary, or rude. /QUOTE]
I fail to see how your examples have anything to do with network tv airing the f word. I also believe that 99% of the time i do think it displays a lazy vocabulary, rude and useless.
There are exception to all rules digging up a couple doesn't prove much.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using EO Forums mobile app
Well, the examples above were aired on network TV. The second one was live on national television, and is precisely the type of profanity that the FCC is seeking comments on and looking to allow. If you can't see how that's relevant to network TV airing the f word, then I got nothing.I fail to see how your examples have anything to do with network tv airing the f word.
You must not have a high opinion of Catholics, or Canadians, since they have some of the most prolific routine potty mouths I know of.I also believe that 99% of the time i do think it displays a lazy vocabulary, rude and useless.
It proves the ridiculousness of the absolutes that people have been talking about in this thread. "Profanity is a weak mind attempting to express it's self," is a statement of absolute, and allows no exceptions. I provided two.There are exception to all rules digging up a couple doesn't prove much.
It would be a win for free speech. It will be a total loss for dignity, politeness, standards and vocabulary.
So now it's just about degrees of profanity? Good grief.Red Skelton was one of the greatest talents of all time. He did at rare times say **** or hell in his live act but those were few and far between and not nearly as harsh as the f word.
I never said it was wrong, I said it shows a weak and closed mind for those who do the latter, because it does.Potaytoe, potahtoe. For some excessive profanity may in no way diminish the credibility of the speaker. For others, it diminishes or eliminates the credibility of the speaker. The former may or may not be wrong. The latter is not wrong either.
Not a chance that the omission of word would have come close to conveying the same emotion. Not a chance. And it's why not a single person who heard it live, including the FCC Chairman and the Commissioner of Baseball, thinks he was wrong in using it.Ortiz message would have been every bit as strong and perhaps stronger with the omission of the f word.