"Company employees told police they caught a man breaking into trailers, and a struggle ensued after he told them he was armed with a gun."
I guess, assuming of course that this is all true, that IF a man is breaking into trailers and he SAYS he is armed with a gun, that "A" you should believe it, and "B" IF you are going to DO something about it, all bets are off. HE said he was armed.
AGAIN, ASSUMING THIS IS ALL TRUE,
we KNOW that:
The man was on private property
The man was caught breaking into trailers on private property
The man claimed he was armed with a gun.
That would make him a threat to the company, the employees lively hood, and since he stated that he was armed, a direct threat to those employees lives. They neutralized a REAL threat. One does not have to see the weapon to act on the "FACT" that he claimed he had it. It it MORE than reasonable to assume that IF a criminal is committing a crime and openly states that he/she/it is armed, that threat should be taken seriously.