Are you saying that anyone who is 'just a driver' is making poor business decisions and therefore provoking contempt and ridicule from the members who feel their own business decisions are superior?
No. And especially no to "anyone" in the context you attempted to pigeonhole me into right there.
I said no already.
Yeah, that one.
People with ES call themselves independent contractors. They also tend to talk, and by reasonable inference
think (whether you agree with it or not) like employees. They will tell you that making the decision to go to work for ES was a good, if not great business decision. Most of the fawning over ES is all about what ES does for the drivers and how, essentially, a lot of the decision-making is removed from the drivers and transferred to ES thus creating a comfortable safety net (at a price, tho). For example,
"IF you ever have an issue with them OR FDCC, all it takes is ONE PHONE CALL to your E.S. dispatcher/Liason and within minutes the issue is resolved, no matter what the issue is." So, if you have a problem with FDCC, ES will fight your battles for you. They will give you empty moves out of bad areas, something you don't have to concern yourself with on your own. They will tell you when and where to get repairs done, no effort on your part required.
Having
no safety net is having your own authority. Leasing on with a carrier provides a safety net, which is I believe what jdevidts was referring to with the jockstrap metaphor, and for which you pay a significant amount of money. Adding
another layer of jockstrap safety net on top of
that, and paying a significant premium for it, is quite the safety net, indeed, especially for an
independent contractor.
OK,
in that context, jdevidts notes and questions the thick irony of an independent contractor with the safety net of a virtual employee who also thinks like an employee. You can't dismiss the terminology as
simply being a longstanding familiarity with the terminology, as the language is very consistent across all posters, and the issues they discuss (the ones that are particularly wonderful) are the very issues and decisions that employers handle for their employees. Drivers who drive for a fleet owner, even those who are used to thinking like an employee, overwhelming use phrases like, "I drive for an owner," not "I work for an owner".
"put in an application and come join the rest of us that are PROUD of whom we work for... FYI; I DO NOT work in the office of E.O. or FDCC, I am a driver, 12 1/2 year veteran with T/T and Expedite, PROUD of what I do and PROUD of whom I work for."
"I worked for them for 6 months..."
"I have worked WITH them since 2008. We have worked for other "so called" Fleet Owners at Panther and been taken to the CLEANERS & LIED too, but working for Expediter Services has been the best experience we have had over ALL!!!!"
These are quotes from people who know the difference, or at least should, yet they consistently use the language of an employee. Others have consistently done the same in these forums in the past.
So we've got independent contractors who talk like employees and have a dual safety net for which they pay through the nose. They talk of discounts, which quite frankly any fleet or truck owner could provide at 35%. The drivers are literally paying themselves for those discounts out of money they should have gotten in the first place, and most of the discounts come directly from the carrier, anyway. But it's a great and smart business decision to go to
work for them.
So again,
in that context, they open themselves up to (i.e., provoking), as you put it, an
unprovoked attack on their thoughts, just reeking of condescension, and it's why I said it wasn't really unprovoked, since they opened the door for that context.
So, to answer your original question again, now in the proper context, no, I am not saying that anyone who is 'just a driver' is making poor business decisions and therefore provoking contempt and ridicule from the members who feel their own business decisions are superior. What I am saying is that ES drivers have been by and large hoodwinked into thinking that going with ES is one of the best, if not the best business decision that can be made by a driver in this industry. Granted, there are some people who need that dual safety net and prefer many of their decisions be made for them, and for those people ES may very well be the perfect place and the best business decision they'll ever make. But for that many drivers to use the same phrasing patterns, language and questionable enthusiasm about "working" for ES, while in the process of advocating that others make the same decision, opens them up to all manner of ridicule and condescension, as it smacks of either mass delusion or well structured indoctrination, blatant recruiting, or planted shills.