Re: OOPs, Typo-s
With all the ES drivers ccoming in here and posting, one thing I find "off" is that they all say how perfect ES is and they never mention a single flaw.
Not only that, but all of these posts here (and in other threads like it) talk in the absolutes of
always and
never, and
the best. For example,
"Also, I have never worked for an owner who DIDNT have an attitude problem or is rude no matter what." I'm assuming, for the benefit of the doubt, that somehow, magically, "never" in this context doesn't include ES, despite
never meaning never, including past and present tense. But more to the point, according to this post, every owner this person has ever worked for (ES being the lone exception, of course) has had an attitude problem or was rude "no matter what", under any and all circumstances, even benign, pleasant situations.
The problem with that, and the absolutes, and the fact that all of these "the best" postings state the same absolutes in more or less the same way, not to mention the sheer number of newly created screen names who are involved in the defense of ES, is that it doesn't coincide with reality, and therefor isn't credible, believable, or even reasonable.
What's more, they have now created a premise so wholly unbelievable that they're stuck between a rock and a hard place. What they've laid out is utterly implausible, and once realized, if they come back and try to temper that with a Paul Harvey Lite of,
"Yes, of course they have their faults just like every one else and they're not perfect, but..." (and there
will be a
but), then any scintilla of potential credibility they might have had will be blown out of the water.
I particularly like the one example where a radical departure from the absolutes stands out, where in their first and only post on EO, they stated an absolute but with a qualifier in that they
generally don't reply to any topics, which is a paradoxical oxymoron, and hilarious.
