KickStarter6
Veteran Expediter
India has around 1.3 million square miles, Texas are 269,000. NOt even close.
I couldn't have been more wrong on the size thing
India has around 1.3 million square miles, Texas are 269,000. NOt even close.
I couldn't have been more wrong on the size thing
India is bigger than Texas, about five times (4.72) the size of Texas. India is slightly more than one-third the size of the US.
United States - 3,794,066 square miles
India - 1,269,346 square miles
Texas - 268,820 square miles
You could have but it would have been hard!
Well... Three of the six reactors suffered meltdowns, releasing deadly radiation into the atmosphere and the ocean. The three that didn't meltdown were not powered up at the time of the tsunami. Four days into the meltdowns the overheating caused the unavoidable reaction between the water and zirconium alloy cladding on the fuel rods creating hydrogen gas, which then exploded, in spectacular fashion. The explosion tore through the structure and blew the walls out and roof off.To me the incident in Japan should improve nuclear energy's public perception. I mean that plant got hit by what 3 natural disasters with a few weeks time and it didn't melt down. I realize other people don't see it that way but I felt it proved how safe it can be.
Stole it.I kinda feel honored that you made a graph of my mistake lol
Stole it.
I did have to snip part of screen capture, then upload it to Photobucket, and then post the direct link to here, so it did require effort. But not much.
Compare countries to countries, or states:
MapFight - India vs Texas (US) size comparison
See any item displayed in actual size on your monitor:
pective - The Actual Size of Stuff.
Think if a hurricane hits New Orleans just as the Mississippi River is fully swollen to the brim from the Spring floods, instead of hitting in August and September like it did. Or, think about if the river is swollen and the New Madrid fault gives a hiccupBut it was hit by natural disasters that would have caused SOME of those issues anyways. Probably not to that great of an extent by any means but 2 horrific events back to back like is a hard pill to swallow. Think if a similar earthquake hit New Orleans right after Katrina. It too would have been bad.
We had two busloads of people come into Calloway County, none of whom knew where they were being taken. They initially went to one of the Boy Scout camps, and then got moved into motel rooms a couple of days later, and then after a week or two most moved into more permanent housing. Some have since gone back to New Orleans, but most have stayed.Side note several families were relocated to my area of central Kentucky, I was a sophomore in high school at the time and to be honest those kids were D-bags but that's another story
I'm gonna take a stab in the dark and guess REAL BAD.Think if a hurricane hits New Orleans just as the Mississippi River is fully swollen to the brim from the Spring floods, instead of hitting in August and September like it did. Or, think about if the river is swollen and the New Madrid fault gives a hiccup
To me the incident in Japan should improve nuclear energy's public perception. I mean that plant got hit by what 3 natural disasters with a few weeks time and it didn't melt down. I realize other people don't see it that way but I felt it proved how safe it can be.
I kinda feel honored that you made a graph of my mistake lol
I kinda feel honored that you made a graph of my gaffe lol
Fish that glow in the dark are easier to catch.
Ya, should have known to stay logged in. That Ragman is on the prowl again.
But really, no one wants to start a panic, or report flimsy evidence of anything. But the fact is, this is a potential global train wreck. Turtles report is accurate, and those stated facts are in, as are mine. I can remember all of Florida being underwater during the Gulf Oil Spill, in accordance to those on the supposed lunatic fringe. Weighed what they had to say, against the MSM reports....and sure enough, the results came in right about the middle. It's not as bad, or worse, given both sides of the issue. Usually...