When have I ever hijacked a thread?
Never mind, never heard of fun have you? You can't tork me off tonight, you just ain't go the juice. Not that you ever have. HEHEHE!!! Smoke that in your ear!!
When have I ever hijacked a thread?
hmmmm.....pretty smart, backward hat wearin' audience then.
Thanks for the facts and figures,as I said,NOBODY watches John Stewart.
Sudsy? Care to expound?
Let me ask DD, why would you resort to such childish behavior on a thread that you obviously have no interest in? You watched that interview, didn't you?
And after checking your profile,I had the opportunity to read many of your blatherings...err I mean posts
He may not .... yet ..... (he just needs a little more polishing .... )You can't tork me off ..... you just ain't go the juice. Not that you ever have.
Starving for attention or something ?Well thank you,glad I got your interest.
Sorry ..... really no interest there ......And BTW,if you want to catch my interest ...
Just reporting the actual facts (on viewership numbers) ..... (as opposed to spouting some vague generality .....)You know what I mean,instead of throwing something out there from the pew research center,why not say try the whole dam* church instead....it just sounds more impressive.
/////////////Starving for attention or something ?
No,and especially not yours.
Sorry ..... really no interest there ......
Then why do you keep posting?
Just reporting the actual facts (on viewership numbers) ..... (as opposed to spouting some vague generality .....)
I went to the pew research site,and was not impressed,I am quite sure that they could manipulate those little charts and graphs any way they would like,depending on how it best serves their interests.
Well, this confirms my paranoid belief that I'm a NOBODY. I try to catch the Daily Show every night. If not at 11:00 pm, then the next day, on the internet machine.
I also believe in trying to watch shows that offer a differing opinion; not just what supports "my side".
Then why do you keep posting ?No,and especially not yours.
Then why do you keep posting?
Heheheheh ... well, there's certainly something to be said for Mark Twain's commentary on statistics:I went to the pew research site, and was not impressed, I am quite sure that they could manipulate those little charts and graphs any way they would like, depending on how it best serves their interests.
Some folks have so much invested that the possibility that they might be mistaken, incorrect, or the absolute worst - utterly wrong - is an idea which is absolutely abhorrent on it's face .... and so they are less inclined to look .....I also believe in trying to watch shows that offer a differing opinion; not just what supports "my side".
Ignorance is bliss.A case can be made for anything I suppose ...... but I gotta think that making a case that by being less observant, less aware, less informed one is somehow better off ... would be a fairly difficult "row to hoe" so to speak ....
Ignorance is bliss.
That first name EXCLUDES THE "H".......just sayin'.Dick Armey on John Stewart
Once again, one of the "academic elite" needs to do their homework.....
That first name EXCLUDES THE "H".......just sayin'.
Good for you.I'm still not gonna watch John Stewart tho'.
Why do you keep calling me an "academic elite"?
Are you trying to say that I posted something that you don't understand.....I think not.