Using that argument negates just about anything then.
Not that it really matters anymore. The Constitution is all but been killed. We are going to be told and controlled from here on out.
True dat.
Using that argument negates just about anything then.
Not that it really matters anymore. The Constitution is all but been killed. We are going to be told and controlled from here on out.
When I say an individual issue, by that I mean the father and the mother, as a unit. The only people who should have a say in this is the one who is pregnant, and the one who got her pregnant. It's nobody else's business, since nobody has anything to do with it or them. To state otherwise is simply out of the need to mind someone else's business and tell them what to do and how to live. You wouldn't stand for someone else telling you how to live your life or raise your kids. Shoe, foot, other.Piercing ears is an individual issue. Tattoos are an individual issue. Implants are an individual issue. Abortion isn't an individual issue. It affects two (at minimum) lives. An individual issue affects only one. So no, it isn't individual and I am not wrong.
Every choice you've ever made concerning your daughter fits that bill. I'm sure you'd happily accept me telling you what to do in that regard.You are correct, until the point where my choice for my life affects another innocent life. At that point it ceases being strictly my business.
If you hold this premise precisely as stated you may wish to revisit that conclusion ... just in light of past history ...It seems to me that everyone who supports or believes in abortion has already been born.
I'm open to input although with no guarantees of acceptance. But again, I'm pointing out the difference between tattoos, piercings, implants, waxings, reductions, liposuction etc. and abortions. The former are individual matters. The latter is not. The former affects only the individual choosing them. The latter does not.
Seems to me the ones speaking for the unborn are the ones murdering them. It's wrong to deprive them of their lives while they have no chance to testify in their own defense, no earlier than their 18th birthday.You want to take on the role of speaking for the unborn, but it's not your unborn to be speaking for. You have no standing in the matter. It's not yours, you have nothing to do with it, it's none of your business. To think that it is your business is abject arrogance.
If you think premeditated murder is wrong, don't commit one, but leave murderers alone to do their thing. Yeah, makes sense.Well, if you think it's wrong, then don't have an abortion.
If you think premeditated murder is wrong, don't commit one, but leave murderers alone to do their thing. Yeah, makes sense.
Looks like life to me. View attachment 6611
Me, too. I don't think anybody said it wasn't. Life begins at conception, I don't think there is very much debate on that.
There are a lot of pro choice women who have kids. My mother was adamantly pro choice. She just never chose to have an abortion, is all, and instead chose to have her babies, including my youngest brother who was definitely a surprise.