yet 12-week fetuses cannot live
Certainly they can live. Then they can be born when the time is right. If not, none of us would be here. Unless of course they are deprived of life.
yet 12-week fetuses cannot live
It doesn't matter what she does with her own womb. I could care less. It's the other person that matters. It's the one who can't speak for himself that's the point.
I know.Yes, you are correct.
The only type of exposure you're experiencing in that regard is ... self exposure ...I have had a long experience of exposure to it in certain participants I regularly see in this forum.
Do you have any idea how utterly ridiculous and desperately grasping that sounds? There is no scientific evidence that something does NOT exist, therefore you should believe it does? Seriously? There is no scientific evidence that unicorns do NOT exist, therefore you should believe in them.There is also no scientific evidence that God does NOT exist. Which makes those who don't believe a bunch of old ninnies who relish in ridiculing everything that THEY don't believe in.
How about all you fog horns who have the audacity to suggest, determine, and expound about what a woman chooses to do with her own womb put your money where your mouth is. I submit you create an organization that agrees to adopt at least one child per pro lifer. You don't even have to love the child. Just be willing to provide whatever resources are necessary to allow the child to reach adulthood.This seems like a perfect solution to me. If you wanted to you could even indoctrinate the sweet little cherub with all your imperial wisdom. This way the child isn't likely to fall prey to what it's evil, murderous mother was willing to do. Jerry Falwell ran his mouth like you jokers but he put his money where his mouth was and gave these pregnant girls a free education if they would agree to not abort and either keep the child or give it up for adoption. The entire world could then truly respect your way of thinking if you were to choose a path like this. How about it? Raise your hand.
It doesn't matter what she does with her own womb. I could care less. It's the other person that matters. It's the one who can't speak for himself that's the point.
Do you have any idea how utterly ridiculous and desperately grasping that sounds? There is no scientific evidence that something does NOT exist, therefore you should believe it does? Seriously? There is no scientific evidence that unicorns do NOT exist, therefore you should believe in them.
The heart starts beating about 18-22 days. Brain waves can be detected as early as 6 weeks
If there is no brain function until 6 weeks, then you don't have life at that point. People are clinically dead if no brain waves exist. So....for me personally, that would be my benchmark.
If there is no brain function until 6 weeks, then you don't have life at that point. People are clinically dead if no brain waves exist. So....for me personally, that would be my benchmark.
It doesn't matter what she does with her own womb. I could care less. It's the other person that matters. It's the one who can't speak for himself that's the point.
Careful there bro ...You must be talking about the father, since that's the only other person involved.
Like I said in a earlier post, the Bible is very clear on when a person's life begins. There's nothing in science or biology to dispute it, either.If there is no brain function until 6 weeks, then you don't have life at that point. People are clinically dead if no brain waves exist. So....for me personally, that would be my benchmark.
Pretty much the same criteria a doctor would use on the living. No brain activity according to them and you are dead.
Correct. Science is a process. Theories are developed, and then through observation and experiment those the theory is either proved or disproved, or is changed to to align with the facts. Religion, on the other hand, wants to skip all that messy observation and experiment stuff and go right to the theory being a stone-cold irrefutable fact.That is NOT what I meant. What I meant was just because there is no scientific evidence that God exists does not mean that He does not. Science has yet to prove or disprove everything that is, or is not, possible, or that may, or may not, exist.
By the same reasoning, there is also no reason to believe.There for, just because there is no scientific evidence proving the existence of God is no reason to not believe.
Yes, however none of those who believe in that will say they believe in it with an absolute moral certainty as a fact, since it's a theory open to be refuted. Religion, on the other hand, does not permit itself to be refuted in any way.There are many in science that believe in the idea of "multi-verses", as in multiple universes. There are many that believe that anything that can be imagined can exist in one, or more, of those universes.
Science is rarely wrong, it's only the theories which are wrong, and it's the theories which are constantly being tested for validity.No scientific proof of something is no reason to either not believe or to believe in something. Science has also, many times, been wrong in the past, very well may be wrong now, and likely will be wrong in the future. Science is not the end all.
Like I said in a earlier post, the Bible is very clear on when a person's life begins. There's nothing in science or biology to dispute it, either.