Search results

............

You can take it anyway you'd care to ... I'm not under any particular obligation to address posts of yours that are addressed to others. As to capitulation, there would have to be some contest or argument going on, in order for that to occur. Trust me on this one: there really ain't. I said...

Sorry - wrong answer. Ball is in your court.

I'll be happy to address it further - as soon as you answer the question I posed as to whether you are for or against capital punishment.

What else can account for the desire to deprive someone else - who likely has not directly harmed one - of their life ? and Simple yes or no question: Are you for capital punishment ? Oh ... it is indeed ...

Under current US law fetuses are not held to be full persons until they are born. Part of that stems from the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution - a document which some evidently profess ought to be fully supported ... and not just the parts that one likes - which states...

The Senate Watergate Committee was only convened after it became known that there were actual violations of criminal law - in furtherance of a partisan political agenda. That's far, far different from what we are apparently dealing with here - which appears to be - at best - perhaps...

My point of reference is to have lived to have made it past the half-century mark. And you're confused about what sort of point of view I'm offering up. Well hey ... that alone - without any other relevant (current-at-the time) intel or expertise whatsoever - clearly makes you fully competent...

Random thought ?

You're so focused and obsessed with slaking your own bloodlust and thirst for vengeance, that it appears that you can't conceive of the potential liability to the innocent ... Nor can you apparently envision the possibility of human error or ill-motivations as evidenced your "100% guilty"...

Largely irrelevant - I was speaking to your total fixation on one thing Scott said ... and apparent lack of observation of Scott's other contribution.

Not much point in answers to questions if retard Congress Critters aren't going to bother to avail themselves of them when they already exist. Good example of that, at the link below, in case of our so-called "man of honor" (aka Rooster Retard): Trey Gowdy said the United States was 'the last...

Apparently you missed the thing about the finger prints ...

Which presumably indicates why (as in: lack thereof) one would post such a silly thing as 100% guilty in the first place ...

It would seem that given that just under 100 attackers were killed (assuming that the reportage contained in "Benghazi: The Definitive Report" is true and accurate) the following question on the part of Ted Cruz: "Why have none of the terrorists who attacked in Benghazi been captured or...

Those who worship at the altar of militarism and violence are engaging in nothing more than modern day human sacrifice. Homicide - if not murder - writ large.

Sorta boggles the mind don't it ?

Since you apparently don't allow for it to be optional ... rather than mandatory or compulsory we get: An apparently authoritarian desire to enforce a certain reality (one's own evidently) on another human being ... Welcome to the psycho realm of punishment as "therapy" or "education" ...

Cue sanctimonious emotional drama, sans much in the way of actual logic and rationality:

Newsflash: Utopia doesn't exist here on Earth. To adopt the view that punishment ought to be a preventative measure - rather than a punitive one - is a very slippery slope indeed ... The only destination on that train is the full-blown authoritarian police state.