Search results

Issa is a complete joke and a total clown ... and probably should be in jail.

Our evolution in terms of harnessing technology seems to far exceeded our evolution in terms of our own humanity.

That assumes good intent on the part of those holding hearings, and an absence of pure partisan politics ... something given Issa's actions is questionable at best ...

Definitely a good idea to link that CNN report with the additional, new video though (h/t muttly): Palestinian youths shot dead on camera - CNN.com Video

LOL ... so predictable ... Seems like Elder of Moron is your 'go to' guy ... Refresh my memory: this is the same doofus whose considered legal assessment was that because the Palestinian Right of Return was an individual right for individuals to return to their homes, Israel could just deal...

A member of the Executive Branch I would presume ... As a member of the Executive Branch it's his prerogative to decline an invitation to testify. Congress can always compel an appearance via subpoena if it really wants him there.

Exceeding Darrell 'Grand Theft Auto' Issa's performance shouldn't be all that difficult ...

Gowdy and the Ben-gauze-see committee will likely be the gift that keeps on giving ... particularly given his penchant for grandstanding and peacuckery ... GOP’s new Benghazi lunatic: Meet Trey Gowdy, its substance-free committee chair - Salon.com Doubtless he'll be an endless source of...

As Robert Mackey of the New York Times reports, the incident was captured on multiple video cameras: Video Shows Killing of Palestinians on 'Nakba Day' - NYTimes.com

Israeli forces - apparently in complete violation of their own rules and regulations - recently targeted and assassinated two unarmed Palestinian youth who, at the time, posed no immediate, direct threat to them. A third individual who was targeted but not killed remains in critical condition...

According to the apparent thinking and standards of some, this nutjob would qualify as a traitor. Don't expect any calls from the mindlessly worshipful for his head on a pike though: Exclusive: Lt. Gen. William Boykin, past Delta Force commander, hit with Army reprimand - The Washington Post

If there is any justice in this world at all, then there will be some who live to see the day where their tax dollars - extracted under duress and the threat of force by the corrupt State that they themselves worship - are used to rearrange 'Chelsea's' plumbing ...

Oh yes ! ... and we all know that mean old Trayvon beat up poor little Georgie ... because, you know: ... little Georgie told us all that it was so ... ;)

ROTFLMAO ... A 'smoking gun' eh ? What ... a 'reminder' from a guy that has publicly stated, and is on record as supporting government propaganda - which lies to and misleads the citizenry - as 'necessary' ? A guy who attempted to smear two members by (falsely) implying that they were making...

Looks like someone is confused about that whole "action ---> reaction" thing ... The concept of "blowback" doesn't only apply to foreign meddling and CIA-agitated coups and subversion of the democratic process in the name of "freedom" ...

Oh ... I'll go you one better: Rather than only reading aristotle's quotation of my comments - which would have the effect of obscuring your comments that I was replying to - I suggest reading them in my original post itself - which was in reply to your OP ... You know: the one in which you...

Yup ... and in this case it's clearly: ... or not ... Actually, I don't believe he's addressed the question as it was posed: Were those going to war in Iraq "defending the Constitution" ? It's a simple yes or no question, relatively easy to answer I would think ... Unless of course one...

Not really ... I make no assumption as to whether or not I am actually on "ignore" ... ;) Further: No ... I base my accusation on the fact that he has avoided answering the question ... What the reasons for, or mechanics of, that avoidance are, is really irrelevant ... ;)

You might wanna rethink the syntax and construction there ... it reads much better like this: "Wow, to get an answer from someone that has had you on ignore for years...." Like I said before: I don't know that he does actually have me on ignore. Wouldn't be the first time I've run into...

That's your assumption ... ;)