Search results

There is no "border dispute" ... :tearsofjoy:

How the GOP's dirtiest slur got a new life Let there be ... ... Trial by combat !!! :tearsofjoy:

Buckle up then ...

That could potentially be good news ... as it could free up some S300 SAM systems for deployment to Ukraine. :clapping-happy:

Extremely right no doubt. Too bad they are not also correct. :tearsofjoy:

... "burner phones" ... :tearsofjoy: There's a little more to the thread ... read it. ;)

Now they've turned on Sean too ... poor Sean ... The circular firing squad continues. :tearsofjoy:

No linky ... :tearsofjoy:

Huh. Well that's certainly very interesting ... and Lev did confirm it. Yes, please do ... and then tell us more ! :tearsofjoy:

Is name-calling allowed now ? Or is that only for "special" someones ? :tearsofjoy:

Interesting analysis in the article.

The projection force is strong with the GOP'ers. :tearsofjoy:

From the piece you cite: Further, from the USA Today article that that article cites, it is not clear that he was a current drug user at the time he filled out the Form 4473. Might have been clean and thought he had beaten it. Indeed, that USA Today article mentions him getting sober in...

That's what I figured. :tearsofjoy: If that were truly the case, it should be relatively easy to corroborate through media reports, court records, etc. That you apparently can't, says just a little something ... doesn't it ? :tearsofjoy: Here ... let me help you out: That was Hunter...

Where in California did this occur and in what court was this adjudicated and a conviction obtained ? Be specific. I'll wait.

Yes, that is correct. You no doubt noted the question was phrased in the present tense. Is there some actual evidence that he was unlawful user of, or addicted to, any of those things at the time he filled out the Form 4473 ?

Good grief ... is there a decoder ring ? :tearsofjoy:

Says you ... and the guy who's hair dye was melting onto his face ... :tearsofjoy: What was the lie ... exactly ? What felony was he convicted of ... exactly ? Losing a gun might be irresponsible ... but pretty sure it's not a crime. That is also not a crime. I'll wait on the answers...

Nope. We know what he is. There's no "think" involved in it ...

Never forget: