Search results

Hey, at least I conceded the idea that you could be right. :p If so, I wouldn't hesitate to consider those countries. :cool:

I would even consder moving there if LOS is correct. :cool:

Those 'some' are flawed. Canada, Great Britain and Austrialia are fine countries.

It's a face palm for taking the conversation in a direction it shouldn't go.

That would mean only 25 out of 167 have a real say in who heads their govenment. Yeah, I would say most do not.

I have to respectfuly disagree. You have said many times "Obama is evil" not "heading in the direction of evil" <poke>:p

Ok fine, will you settle for half? geezzz

That may be true of western cultures, but I'd venture to guess most of Africa and Asia don't have much say in who runs their government.

I never said a comparison should go away. If it is warrented, fine (can we say pol pot, idi amein, etc), but I really don't see a Clinton or Bush or Obama as an evil person. Incompetent-yes, bad policy-yes, damaging to our relations with other countries-yes, but evil-NO. Whatever damage is done...

I really don't understand how or why comparisons to Hitler or Nazis happen, But I wish they would STOP!!!!! While one may disagree with the politics of the sitting president, calling him (or her if the case may be) a Hitler or Nazi is unconscionable IMHO. Thank you very much. I am done...

Napoleon would be my guess.

The only problem is, most can't elect their govenment.

True, but I just thought you would want to see this. See that, even tho I don't agree with people on the extend of the problem, I always look for stories others may like. :p

Agreed....

Glad to see you keep up on current events. Must have been that 5th. :p

Sandusky took the children into the locker room.

Here ya go.

AMonger will love this one. State troopers who gave 100-mph escort to