"...if I had a contractor that had done the average 120K a year prior to having this type of difficulty, and, we had to have a discussion about "who's tab is it?", over a $500 towing bill, that Contractor and I would have a discussion about why I won't place anymore of "our" (the Contractors and Companys) customers valuable freight on their truck."
Calling the freight "our customer's" freight, meaning a partnership between the company and the contractor, and then at the same time trying to lay all of the responsibility onto the contractor by using the contractor's past revenue, without bringing your own past revenue into the equation, is, at the very least, hypocritically ingenuous. It's not really a question of how large of a cooked goose, but rather a question of will the goose allow itself to be cooked by the gander. You make it sound like just because a contractor did 120K the past year that they now owe you something above and beyond for your charity, as if you didn't also profit quite handsomely from the same revenue stream, and quite likely with far less overhead. Why you would want to end an admitted profitable partnership with a good truck over a $500 towing bill is beyond me.