Van (A-B unit) questions

MDB1

Expert Expediter
Turtle,
Thanks for posting the info from the Kentucky laws. I am going to print that and carry it with me. I may even start bypassing the scales in KY. :)

As for Michigan though, that worries me a little bit. I thought someone posted a few months back that MI had actually changed the law to require anything over 5000 GVWR to scale. Can someone verify or clarify that?

Thanks.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
The short answer:
Cargo vans don't have to scale in Michigan.


The long, gory details answer:
In Michigan, the 5,000 pounds thing isn't about scaling, it's about requiring any commercial vehicle over 5000 GVW to have the DOT numbers and carrier name and city displayed on the side door of the vehicle.

For vehicles licensed in Michigan, and used for intrastate transportation...
"All commercial vehicles with a single or combination gross weight rating or total gross weight of more than 5,000 lbs., and all towing or platform bed wreckers, must have the name, city and state or registered logo or emblem of the registered owner of the vehicle, and lessee of the vehicle if it is being operated under lease, painted or permanently attached on each side of the vehicle, with letters not less than three inches in height and not lower than the bottom edge of the door."

Again, that's only for intrastate commercial vehicles that operate within the borders of Michigan. But, that's even if for just one load, tho, so if you're from out of state and you pickup in Michigan, and then deliver in Michigan, the DOT Lettering applies for all vehicles of 5000 pounds.


Most of the weigh station confusion in Michigan comes from the conflicting definitions for a commercial motor vehicle, a commercial vehicle, and in some cases depending on if it is used in interstate (across state lines) and intrastate (pickup and deliver within Michigan) transportation.

Michigan Vehicle Code 7a, in part, defines a commercial vehicle as, "a motor vehicle, having a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,000 pounds or less..." and "used to carry hazardous materials in amounts requiring a placard."

That's the requirement for a "Group C" CDL in Michigan. Which, of course, conflicts with the more restrictive federal definition of 10,001 pounds or more. Meaning, unless you haul HAZMAT (or more than 16 passengers for free or more than 9 for compensation), you can have a truck that weighs in at 25,000 pounds, and as long as you don't cross the state lines, you aren't even required to have a CDL.

However, if your vehicle weighs more than 10,000 pounds, then you are required to have a Chauffeur's license. If you have a vehicle that weighs 26,001 or more, you first have to get your chauffeur's license, and then you apply and test to get your CDL, which is retarded, and groups are working to get that changed. In some cases, you can have your CDL and if you don't also have your chauffeur's' license you can get a ticket. Applies to Michigan residents, only, of course.

As far as scaling is concerned, basically, cargo vans do not have to scale in Michigan. The confusion comes from the definitions of, and the language used in, the definitions of a commercial vehicle and a commercial motor vehicle and in which is required to enter the scales.

A Commercial Vehicle is simply:
"All motor vehicles used for the transportation of passengers for hire, or constructed or used for transportation of goods, wares or merchandise, and/or all motor vehicles designed and used for drawing other vehicles and not so constructed as to carry any load thereon either independently or any part of the weight of a vehicle or load so drawn."

(This is the same as the Kaintuckee version of, 'if you are doing commerce out of your van, then you're a commercial vehicle' kinda thing. :))

OK, so, cargo vans, as well as floral delivery vans, are considered commercial vehicles in Michigan. Got it.

For the Commercial Motor Vehicle definition (note the "Motor" in there), the State of Michigan uses same exact definition as the FMSCR 390.5 uses, which, for cargo vans, is a GVW of less-than 10,001 pounds, or carrying placardable HAZMAT. Simple.

So, who, exactly, has to enter the Michigan scales?

MVC 257.724(5)
"A driver or owner of a commercial vehicle with other vehicles or trailers in combination, a truck or truck tractor, a truck or truck tractor with other vehicles in combination, or any special mobile equipment, who fails to stop at or bypasses any scales or weighing station is guilty of a misdemeanor."


Okay, the key component with respect to cargo vans is "a commercial vehicle with other vehicles or trailers in combination..." The use of the term "commercial vehicle" would include cargo vans, but it is further qualified to include only those commercial verhicles that are in combination with other vehicles or trailers, which excludes cargo vans.

A good resource for you Michiganders is http://www.truckingsafety.org/
Others may find it of some benefit, as well. The FAQ and especially the GUIDEBOOK sections should be helpful to most anyone. The Guidebook has all the definitions and pertinent information, as well as a lot of valuable phone numbers.

I got a lot of my information from there, as well as from
http://www.legislature.mi.gov
Either under Laws, or under Chapter Index, or one of the searches. I find it useful to look up the actual citation, for any amendmenets, when something is referenced on some Web site that may or may not be current or accurate.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Turtle,
With all do respect, this has been beaten into the ground back in March.

http://www.expeditersonline.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=3725&forum=DCForumID1

Late For Dinner had a ticket for this issue.

I have a copy of the MSP bulltin that clearly states any commercial vehicle that is over 5000 lbs is to scale. Van you may get by, but a box truck they will chase you. Everything I have does not say a thing that they changed it.

The issue that I have is the state lowering the weight to capture a potential ticket revenue. I know several van drivers who have by chance been ticketed for blowing by scales and they all went to court and lost.
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Greg, would it be possible for you to post your copy of the MSP bulletin, as it is apparently at odds with the definition cited above by Turtle ("in combination with")?
BTW, receiving a ticket for an infraction doesn't mean you actually violated any statute - as Turtle's post illustrates, the statutes can be extremely confusing, or open to interpretation, even for LEOs. Which means most tickets go unchallenged, of course.x(
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
> BTW, receiving a ticket for an infraction doesn't mean you
>actually violated any statute - as Turtle's post
>illustrates, the statutes can be extremely confusing, or
>open to interpretation, even for LEOs. Which means most
>tickets go unchallenged, of course.x(

I wish I could but I am told I was not allowed to, it was given to me to clarify the issue. It is on the internet and I will look for the link and post that.

Yes the ticket issue is a result of the MSP carrier enforcement division being told from the goverment to enforce some of these commerical laws. I know that they LEOs are not happy about it and many of them have been clear, 5000 and above are now trucks - hence the reason I call my van a truck.

And I have been a victim of the need to increase revenue in the state and know first hand there is no choice in the matter in this d*mn state with some issues.

Also Michigan legistlators have a habit of making things too vague and open to interpetation. Their intent is not to create defined laws but to allow law enforcment, cities and townships and who ever to decide how to apply the laws.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Back in March is when I did the research, promted primarily by the section of the MSP bulletin that was alluded to in that thread, printed out all of the relevant laws, and stopped by a Michigan scale house for clarification.

The Bullitin stated:
"Section 257.724(5) – language identifying what vehicles are required to cross the scales is clarified:
o Commercial vehicles (as defined in 257.7) with other vehicles or trailers in combination;
o A truck or truck tractor, single or in combination;
o Any special mobile equipment.


There are two key things here, wich I outlined above. The with other vehicles or trailers in combination would seem to exclude cargo vans, yet the state's definition of a "truck" in 257.75 would seem to include them, which "means every motor vehicle designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property."

I was told that, yes, an officer could apply the law to include cargo vans, since it falls into the "deliberately broad and vague" definition of truck.

I then asked about the burden of proof as to what constitutes the "primarily" qualifier as it applies to all trucks. My van isn't specifically or even primarily designed to haul property, nor is it used or maintained primarily for that purpose. I have a permanent bed, a refrigerator, a microwave oven, even limited restroom facilities. It's primary use is for my living quarters, and I also occasionaly haul property in it. Even using the DOT Hours of Service as a guide, the vast majority of time the van is not spent hauling property, and is at those times being employed in its primary purpose - my shelter.

He smiled and said, "Then you don't have to scale."

I talked with my lawyer, admittedly not licensed in Michigan, and he said when you put all the relevant statues together, cargo vans are not required to scale in Michigan, and a ticket for bypassing a scale would be dismissed in court, provided you cite the applicable statues. He also commented that, it would seem, the Michigan Legislature has quite the impressive ability to surpass even Kentucky in their expertise in being extraordinarly vague.

Where the MSP bulletin talks about specifically amending 257.723, to include all commercial vehicles over 5000 pounds, that's strickly for door lettering requirements, not for scaling.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Turtle,

I will not argue with the points made (which are very good and clearly made) but will be clear about how I feel - I am told by two good freinds that I will get a ticket if the officer decides to give me one for bypassing a scale. I know I will not win in court by past records of the courts in those juridictions where the tickets are written and I can't afford a ticket beside I try really hard not to even get pulled over so I scale.

The two freinds I mention are MSP CE officers and they are told specifically that they are to ticket vans with company logos that appear to operate interstate or to be equipped to do so and box trucks if they bypass a scale. This is not to say it happens as the state wants it, a lot of officers don't care about the law and think it is stupid but the oppertunity is there for them to act as they feel.

My lawyer has been also very clear, they opened the door for revenue generation and it don't matter what I say or what Officer X says on the inbound scale on 75 because on the inbound scale on 94, officer Y has a different idea, gives me a ticket and the court will support him not me or confirm Officer X's opinion. He says SCALE, so I scale.

The drivers I know who have been ticketet, one with his lawyer in tow lost their fight. I talked to one last night (the one with the lawyer) and he said the judge said the statute defined a truck as any commercial vehicle that is used for hire and over 5000 lbs. Mentioned was the insurance and how it prohibits the use of the vehicle for anything other commercial use i.e. commercial insurance, it is assumed that the owner uses the van for commercial purposes exclusivly. And also mentioned is the fact that the lease agreement with the owner for exclusive use on as needed basis futher reinforced the judges position that the ticket was deserved. This driver said it didn't matter if I was empty of loaded, the judge didn't care about that fact, just the possibility that I can be loaded was good enough for him.

I am trying to figure out why this is such a big deal with many of the van drivers.

How many scales are there? I count only a few in my state and many are closed because the state can't afford to man all the time.

My God the speed that the vans are allowed to drive at offset the time it takes to go through one.

IF you don't want to get stopped at a scale keep your van clean and look professional - that usually works.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
If someone feels unsure, if they feel the need to scale, then by all means, they should scale. Personally, I don't have a problem with scaling at all. I've scaled too many times while hauling HAZMAT, and besides, there's little they can put me through at a scale that the Canadian or US Customs officers haven't done twice over with great gusto.

Incidentally, I carry a separate insurance policy specifically to cover the van when I'm not in service.
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Greg, I have no problem scaling, I do it all the time, what I have a problem with is the lack of clear regulations. We are held responsible for knowing the law, and for violating it, but that's impossible if we cannot determine what exactly the law is - and if LEO's can't figure it out, how am I supposed to?!
 

damoore46

Seasoned Expediter
>If you are in Alabama you must log from the time you enter
>the state until the time you leave the state, HAZMAT or not.
>You also have to scale in Alabama, but they only have one
>permanent scale, located at the Georgia state line on I-20.
>They do have 10 mobile scales, however, that move around a
>lot, so if you see one you have to enter it.
>
>When you log in a van, you MUST accurately account
>for the last 7 days. Failure to do so with almost certainly
>get you parked for 10 hours. However, the time that must be
>accounted for is time spent as a commercial vehicle. If, in
>the past 7 days you weren't hauling placardable HAZMAT, or
>driving in Alabama, then your commercial vehicle status for
>those days would be Off-Duty. If, for example, 3 days ago
>you had a placardable HAZMAT load, then you would show that
>on the 7 days' accounting, and you would be Off-Duty all of
>the rest of that time.


Does anyone have a verifiable source for the above?
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Cheri,
Welcome to Michigan

For all who don't know;

We have a full time legislator and a part time state.
 
Top