The opposing political party went so low on the attacks (just to benefit their own interest) that they are not ashamed on suggesting that Eugenics will be included in the bill.
Just to benefit their own interests you say?? Well, it's in MY best interest to reject anything that comes even close to eugenics.
If there isn't enough money to pay for this monstrosity, there WILL BE RATIONING, there's no other way to explain how this thing will work, regardless of how the administration wants to spin it.
Now, if there's rationing, what would be the criteria for who gets what? It can't be decided by race, as have so many policies in the past, using affirmative action, it would have to be decided by who is the most "viable" candidate for which procedures.
When the President of the United States has the audacity to stand before us and declare that maybe Grandma should "take a pill" instead of receiving whichever procedure you want to insert.....there's a problem.....you can't see that?
Now, let's go to the other end of that....what about all of these tiny babies in the NICU's.......most are viable, AFTER they receive weeks, if not months of care. You'd like me to trust that the government "panels", some have suggested as little as five people, will not deem these angels not viable and let them die? Before you answer that, remember that as a state senator, Obama voted AGAINST extending care to a surviving baby of a botched abortion. Now, you want me to NOT make a short leap over to the needs of the premature babies?
So, if we're rationing these preemies OUT OF THE SYSTEM......what do you call that......isn't that basically eugenics?
