I thought the USA Today did the better job.....while they don't support Trump they set a disclaimer they are not endorsing Clinton either...The USA TODAY, the Flagship of the Gannett Federation, didn't exactly come out and endorse Clinton, because they don't endorse political candidates at that publication, but they did come out full-frontal to do an anti-Trump endorsement. They had a unanimous consensus against Trump, but were split on Hillary. While mentioning it as the obvious elephant in the room, they nevertheless dance around the same willful suspension of belief regarding Hillary Clinton's record and pattern of deceit, dismissing it as far less important than keeping Trump out of the White House. They have all the proper talking points and buzzwords the Clinton campaign requires (the siren song of a dangerous, unfit, temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty, they're all in there).
It's hilarious. They basically said, "Look, you don't have to vote for Clinton, but if you vote for Trump you're an idiot, and if you vote third-party and don't vote for Hillary then Trump might win, which also makes you an idiot."
It's not like 100 years ago when newspaper endorsement mattered. Today with the Internet and so many different sources for news and opinion, newspaper endorsements mean next to nothing.
On the other hand, it's a lead pipe cinch that the Trump Hotels will no longer be placing complementary copies of USA TODAY outside their guest's room door after today.
New taxes will be enacted once this program has amassed a huge debt. Like any other government handout, get the people hooked and the program won't stand a chance of being eliminated....no taxation/programs in place to pay this NEW cost...5 Trillion added to the debt every 4 years!
Oh, I dunno. Newspapers are supposed to be brokers of honest opinion. The anti-Trump endorsement came off as more of an insidious attempt to sway voters away from electing the candidate of their choice. After reading the editorial, I’m now even more convinced that we need a political outsider to be our next president. The Gannett Company's USA TODAY Editorial Board has proved how far-reaching insider politics extend into every aspect of our lives to control how people are supposed to think. The fact that Trump has the support of such a high percentage of American voters should stand on its own, and give the editorial board pause. The board members’ opinion is rightfully theirs, as is ours, but publishing their anti-Trump opinion has lowered the newspaper’s standards to those of a tabloid.I thought the USA Today did the better job.....while they don't support Trump they set a disclaimer they are not endorsing Clinton either...
Ruh-roh ...
Dump them both........Dump Hillary!