Really! Wow!
Here I thought that Georgia, being a state case, the Orange meister would be able to do that.
Lol
Lol
Ha ha ha
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
Here I thought that Georgia, being a state case, the Orange meister would be able to do that.
Lol
Lol
Ha ha ha
Well now that you mentioned it, this was more of an ad hominem attack against these two justices than just a criticism of a decision - since it was yet to be announced. But this leak and the threats came from the left-wing abortionists, not the "MAGA extremists." Didn't the liberal wackos protest in front of their houses threatening their families as well?
Merry Christmas, Jack Smith!
A new audio tape has emerged. It is evidence. Assuming Jack Smith can get his hands on this tape, when presenting this evidence to the jury, Smith needs no witnesses. He need only press the play button for the jury to hear Trump himself -- in his own voice -- display his criminal intent and actually commit this crime (offering something of value to a public official to not perform a required duty).
GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel was also on this call and is also implicated in this crime.
A new audio tape has emerged. It is evidence. Assuming Jack Smith can get his hands on this tape, when presenting this evidence to the jury, Smith needs no witnesses. He need only press the play button for the jury to hear Trump himself -- in his own voice -- display his criminal intent and actually commit this crime (offering something of value to a public official to not perform a required duty).
GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel was also on this call and is also implicated in this crime.
Trump recorded pressuring Wayne County canvassers not to certify 2020 vote
Trump pressured two canvassers not to sign the certification of the 2020 presidential election, according to recordings reviewed by The Detroit News.
www.detroitnews.com
Last edited:
The "in furtherance of his duties" defense has been neutralized in court. That defense is a nothingburger. The tape is evidence.
What Do These People Have in Common? Hint: ETTD
Rudy Giuliani
Mark Meadows
Rupert Murdoch
Mike Lindell
John Eastman
Sidney Powell
Jenna Ellis
Kenneth Cheseboro
Lin Wood
Jeffrey Clark
Daire Rendon
Stefanie Lambert
Mark DePerno
Ernest Walker
Gary Fiedler
Fake electors in Nevada
Fake electors in Michigan
Fake electors in Georgia
Fake electors in Wisconsin
1,237 Jan 6 insurrection participants
And others
All of them broke laws to support Trump's 2020 election lies, and all of them are paying a price for doing so.
Rudy Giuliani
Mark Meadows
Rupert Murdoch
Mike Lindell
John Eastman
Sidney Powell
Jenna Ellis
Kenneth Cheseboro
Lin Wood
Jeffrey Clark
Daire Rendon
Stefanie Lambert
Mark DePerno
Ernest Walker
Gary Fiedler
Fake electors in Nevada
Fake electors in Michigan
Fake electors in Georgia
Fake electors in Wisconsin
1,237 Jan 6 insurrection participants
And others
All of them broke laws to support Trump's 2020 election lies, and all of them are paying a price for doing so.
And yet, the Mindless MAGA Monsters continue to make ridiculous excuses for The Tangerine One.
Lock Him Up!
I wonder if it's a little like a smoking addiction. They know it's wrong. They know its harmful. Yet they continue to voluntarily inhale poison into their bodies and brains, and they find it difficult to quit.
Wait, what? Canvassers were threatened and pressured to sign when they had concerns about the vote tabulations and wanted an audit instead of just rubber stamping the results? And the “ something of value” that Trump offered to hold off and examine it further was wait for it…. a lawyer? lol. Oh, the humanity.
To you, its a joke. In the hands of Jack Smith and before a jury, it's a smoking gun.
Providing them with an election lawyer is now a crime. This is where we are at with the Lefties.
Once again, you mischaracterize the issue. In this case Trump offered to provide something of value (an attorney) to a public official in an attempt to influence the actions of that official. Another word for this is bribery.
Trump did not offer a lawyer because he thought the canvasser needed a lawyer. He made the offer contingent on the canvasser doing an illegal act. And he did it on tape! Evidence in his own voice. Smoking gun. Nail in coffin.
There are a lot of questions about the origin and release of this tape. From what I can gather from various reports:
1. The tape exists.
2. It was recorded by people on the receiving end.
3. It may or may not have been recorded by one of the canvassers. The call took place when two of the canvassers and others were in a car in a parking lot. Someone else present may have made the recording.
4. The person who alerted the Detroit News to the tape and apparently shared it with them was someone the Detroit News characterized as an "intermediary." It was someone who did not make the tape but somehow got their hands on it and brought it to the newspaper, on condition of anonymity.
5. Of the two canvassers who were in the car and took the call, one is now deceased. When asked about it, the one who is still alive did not deny the existence of the tape or the reported contents.
6. We do not know if prosecutors previously had or knew about this tape.
If prosecutors do not have the tape, it will be easy for them to get. All they have to do is demand it or information about its whereabouts from the canvasser. If the canvasser is not forthcoming, a subpoena or search warrant would be easy for prosecutors to obtain.
Last edited:
US Supreme Court Denies Jack Smith's Request for Quick Hearing on the Trump Immunity Question
"Both sides will still have the option of appealing an eventual ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals up to the high court, but the court’s move is a major victory for Trump, whose strategy of delay in the criminal case included mounting a protracted fight over the immunity question, which must be settled before his case goes to trial.
"An expedited review of the issue is already underway at the DC Circuit, which has scheduled oral arguments for January 9. The election subversion trial is currently set to begin in March." (Source)
"Both sides will still have the option of appealing an eventual ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals up to the high court, but the court’s move is a major victory for Trump, whose strategy of delay in the criminal case included mounting a protracted fight over the immunity question, which must be settled before his case goes to trial.
"An expedited review of the issue is already underway at the DC Circuit, which has scheduled oral arguments for January 9. The election subversion trial is currently set to begin in March." (Source)
