Oh, now we're into code words?That isn't all they heard.
Remember Michael Cohen's testimony before Congress ...
Oh, now we're into code words?That isn't all they heard.
Remember Michael Cohen's testimony before Congress ...
I think a mass pardon of the Jan 6 insurrectionists would be deemed valid. Andrew Johnson pardoned Confederate soldiers en mass. Jimmy Carter pardoned draft dodgers en mass. Benjamin Harrison pardoned all members of the Mormon Church en mass (bigamy).That would raise a lot of issues as to whether any such pardons were actually valid ... or yet another attempt at obstructing justice.
I think a mass pardon would be deemed valid. Andrew Johnson pardoned Confederate soldiers en mass. Carter pardoned draft dodgers en mass. Benjamin Harrison pardoned all members of the Mormon Church.
Oh, now we're into code words?
You said the real story. I was quoting you.ATeam,
Possible scramble to come up with "evidence" so that "the real story" that muttly referred to earlier can be told:
Unruly: impossible to control. Are you saying that's not accurate?
So you can't get him on inciting from his speech because there wasn't anything in the speech that did that. Notice how the news outlets don't really play over and over again his speech? Because it would mention the word peaceful and it is exculpatory. So now we're into what he said in perceived code words and dog whistles because they don't have a case.Mob bosses talk like they talk ...
It's actually a known thing.
Ok ok. Didn't mean to get you all triggered. Throw the book at the people involved with violence.Not at all.
But just so we're clear here: by the same sort of logic, the 9/11 terrorists were "unruly" ... as was Timothy McVeigh.
You said the real story. I was quoting you.
Ok ok. Didn't mean to get you all triggered. Throw the book at the people involved with violence.
No. None had a dog in those fights. But the Constitution is pretty clear about pardon power. Trump already pardoned some of his associates in cases where he may very well have had a dog in those fights (Stone, Manaford, Flynn, etc.). No one has challenged his ability to do that.Any of those Presidents have a dog in the fight ?
If not, it's a different scenario.
So you can't get him on inciting from his speech because there wasn't anything in the speech that did that.
Notice how the news outlets don't really play over and over again his speech? Because it would mention the word peaceful and it is exculpatory. So now we're into what he said in perceived code words and dog whistles because they don't have a case.
No. None had a dog in those fights. But the Constitution is pretty clear about pardon power. Trump already pardoned some of his associates in crime (Stone, Manaford, etc.). No one has challenged his ability to do that.
A quick news check on Saturday evening shows the MAGA people (is that a fair term?) are quiet. A car parade in one city. A couple flag waving demonstrations on street corners here and there. A lightly attended gathering at a state capitol or two. No MAGA activity reported in DC.
What about them? They're just signs from Trump supporters.
What about them? They're just signs from Trump supporters.
You don't make ominous assumptions from BLM signs, right?