The Trump Card...

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Border Wall may trigger lawsuits over eminent domain.

Trump to landowners: "You don't want to sell us the land for the wall? Fine, No Wall for YOU!. Good luck. Everybody will be funneled right through your property. BWWAAAHHAAAA"
 

Worn Out Manager

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
US Air Force
Border Wall may trigger lawsuits over eminent domain.

Trump to landowners: "You don't want to sell us the land for the wall? Fine, No Wall for YOU!. Good luck. Everybody will be funneled right through your property. BWWAAAHHAAAA"
IMHO, the wall will never happen. Too many obstacles from Congress to landowners to state governments.

Sent from my hand-held Etch-A- Sketch
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
16e09351c3e242c5af4d649bfed1a25f.jpg
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Chelsea is kind of an idiot.

She Tweeted this, from a story from Out Magazine, and noted how outrageous it is. The headlined narrative is Trump Administration Omits LGBTQ People from 2020 Census.

The reality is, the census has NEVER included LGBTQ people in the Census.

Apparently, a lot of people really, really want the federal government to know their sexual orientation. If the pendulum ever swings back the other way, having a federal registry of LGBTQ people will be worse than having a federal registry of gun owners. Gun owners could have their guns taken away, but LGBTQ people could be targeted for much worse. The federal government is already all up in our business enough as it is.

The reality is, Obama and Congressional Democrats made a push to include specific LGBTQ breakdowns in the Census. The Census people considered the idea, and rejected it. Liberal activists within the Census Bureau went ahead and included "sexual orientation" and "gender identity," in a report outlining new categories for the survey, in the hopes that once included in the report that they'd be there to stay. But that was quickly stomped to a pulp by the Bureau for many reasons. But GLAAD's CEO, Sarah Kate Ellis, immediately branded the move as a "systematic effort on behalf of the Trump administration to erase LGBT people." Despite the fact that no one is getting erased from anything.

True enough, there are a few federal agencies that would like to know the sexual orientation makeup of certain areas to better enforce some of the laws on the books, but those laws and regulations come from identity politics in the first place. With the more focused questions on the Census, law makers would be better equipped to ensure appropriate legislation to improve the lives of LGBTQ citizens, so the argument goes. But that's just more identity politics. Trump isn't interested in identity politics, and thus has made no effort to go out of his way to promote LGBTQ Census questions.

Meghan Maury, Criminal and Economic Justice Project Director of the National LGBTQ Task Force released a statement:

"Today, the Trump Administration has taken yet another step to deny LGBTQ people freedom, justice, and equity, by choosing to exclude us from the 2020 Census and American Community Survey."

LGBTQ people have never been on the Census. Ever. Trump didn't take a step to deny anybody anything. He left things as they are so that everyone is treated equally based on sexual orientation.

"LGBTQ people are not counted on the Census—no data is collected on sexual orientation or gender identity."

Correct.

"Information from these surveys helps the government to enforce federal laws like the Violence Against Women Act and the Fair Housing Act and to determine how to allocate resources like housing supports and food stamps."

Horse hockey. What boxes people check on the Census plays no role whatsoever in any of the above.

"If the government doesn’t know how many LGBTQ people live in a community, how can it do its job to ensure we’re getting fair and adequate access to the rights, protections and services we need?"

Fair and adequate access to rights, protections and services is not dependent on knowing how many of a particular group lives in a particular community. Whether it's one or ten thousand in a community, the same access to rights, protections and services remains the same.

"We call on President Trump and his Administration to begin collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data on the American Community Survey as soon as possible and urge Congress to conduct oversight hearings to reveal why the Administration made the last-minute decision not to collect data on LGBTQ people.”

A) this was no last minute decision. People have been trying to get LGBTQ data on the Census since at least 1977, and no one, not even Obama, has been able to convince the Census Bureau or Congress of the valid need for such information to be included. B) be careful what you wish for. LGBTQ Census data could very likely reveal the ridiculously high estimate of 23 percent of the population being LGBTQ is more likely to be less than 2 percent.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
From the perception of the media and politicians, I was thinking the LGBTQ percentage was more like 80%. The rest were squares. Lol
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Somebody in Russia put out one of those fake news propaganda pieces, Trump repeated it.... Collusion.

Didja see where CNN "fact checked" Spicey's Russian dressing comment? They determined that the dressing is not, in fact, Russian, but rather is made in Nashua, NH. Furthermore, it's not even supposed to be used on salads, but rather on sandwiches, like a Reuben.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Somebody in Russia put out one of those fake news propaganda pieces, Trump repeated it.... Collusion.

Didja see where CNN "fact checked" Spicey's Russian dressing comment? They determined that the dressing is not, in fact, Russian, but rather is made in Nashua, NH. Furthermore, it's not even supposed to be used on salads, but rather on sandwiches, like a Reuben.

OMG. The horror. lol
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
It is turning out that my self-imposed July 1 next-post date is artificial and unnecessary. And there is an additional observation I wish to share. It's about Trump's weight gain.

Now in the gym business, Diane and I are more tuned into people's weight gains and losses than when we were as expediters. Trump almost always hides his body under suit jackets and overcoats. The occasional golf course photo shows him in a polo shirt. Shots from the past compared to recent ones show added body fat. We also see body fat building in his face. It seems to us that Trump is carrying 30 lbs or more body fat than he did before he became president. That is a significant and dangerous gain for a man of any age but more so for one age 70.

I don't know if there is any way for Trump supporters to get through to him to caution him against the risks and urge a better diet and exercise routine. Those who care about him would do well to try. Convincing him to adopt a healthier lifestyle would add years to his life.

Except for golf (often shown using carts instead of walking), Trump says he avoids physical activity (he is a good golfer and truly enjoys the game according to the sports literature). By his own account, Trump's diet is dominated by junk food. That health history combined with the added stress of the presidency (a job in which he is finding out that he is not the boss and not the winner like he fancied himself in business) is a potentially lethal combination.

Granted, Trump has already outlived a good number of men who lead healthier lifestyles than him. Nevertheless, Trump would do well to adopt healthier habits for the same reason others do; look better, feel better, live longer. Like all top officials in Washington, Trump has easy access to doctors, nutritionists, personal trainers and fitness facilities. It would be nice to see him put them to use.

A trainer would help Trump with his posture and gait also. While the cause can be one of many possible causes, Diane and I are noticing that Trump now walks with his head lower and shoulders more rounded. Burdens of the office? Maybe. There is no way to know. We do know that improvements to posture and gait can be made when the condition is accepted and managed. In our gym, we have seen 80-something people literally give up their walkers after working with our trainers. Trump is in no need of a walker but he can clearly benefit from time with a good trainer.

Diane and I enjoyed reading this article about 84 year-old Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's fitness routine. In our gym, we have 70 - 80+ year-olds in similar condition. It's amazing how healthy elderly people can become when they set their mind to it. Such mind-setting often happens after surviving a health scare, like a heart attack, or in Ginsburg's case, cancer.

For many, the rescue fantasy is the approach. That is, I'll live my unhealthy life until something happens. Then, after I survive my heart attack, stroke or am diagnosed as a diabetic, I'll change my ways and be good as new. Unfortunately, because of death or disability, people do not always get that second chance to be good as new. If they do survive to live another day, the old habits often prove too difficult to break. It's easy to imagine yourself healthy and fit one day in the future. Those who become healthy after being unhealthy put in the work today.

Trump is walking a dangerous path by avoiding exercise and eating junk food as he is. It seems to be a point of pride for him to avoid physical activity and eat junk food. If he can change his mind about that, his body will follow.
 
Last edited:

coalminer

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Depression leads to overeating no doubt he is depressed about not being able to do the things he promised when campaigning.


Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Physical activity is an important part in maintaining a persons good health. It does however increase the amount of free radicals in a person's system, so a good diet is necessary to counteract the stress of exercise. IMO Trump's longevity thus far is due to the following : good genes, doesn't smoke, doesn't drink alcohol, and appears to be able to handle stress well, as evident of having very good blood pressure.
His blood profile (cholesterol, etc.) was also very good according to Dr Oz, who looked at his results.
Trump's lack of exercise hasn't affected him adversely because he isn't adding excessive free radicals in his body which causes cellular damage in it.
 
Last edited:

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
It is turning out that my self-imposed July 1 next-post date is artificial and unnecessary.
And now you're back early. You know, if you were Trump, or Paul Ryan, you'd be wall-to-wall on CNN for the next 4 days because of this, with them replaying your statement regarding July 1 on a loop. <snort>

Nevertheless, I'm glad to have you back posting again.

Depression leads to overeating no doubt he is depressed about not being able to do the things he promised when campaigning.
Trump's been a keen watcher of politics for many decades. He knows his dictatorial limits. I don't think he has any illusions. He's done a lot of deals over the years, some successfully, some not, many of which he wanted to get done really, really badly. Whether they get done or not, he moves on to the next one. He doesn't get depressed, but he will get even if he can. Read his book. It's all a game, and win, lose or draw, he wins and doesn't get depressed about any of it.

IMO Trump's longevity thus far is due to the following : good genes, doesn't smoke, doesn't drink alcohol, and appears to be able to handle stress well, as evident of having very good blood pressure.
I agree. He doesn't have stress.
He is a carrier, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davekc

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
The MSM hasn't even heard of this story yet.

When Trump first Tweeted about being wiretapped, my knee-jerk reaction was CIA Director John Brennan. Mainly because he has a history of being very Allen Dulles-like (the architect of America's Secret Government. I encourage you to read as much on that guy as possible), where he thinks he can do whatever he wants. He took his oath of office not on a Bible, but on an original draft of the US Constitution, because it was one without the Bill of Rights (something for which he has openly expressed his disdain, because it allows the people far too much freedom and restricts the powers of the State far too much). His graduate thesis was about the ridiculousness of the notion of "absolute human rights," believing that government censorship of the press was correct and proper, and that the right of the people should extend only as far as the government says so. The 2012 Wikileaks email dump showed unambiguously that Brennan was the person behind the witch hunt of journalists who reported unflattering Obama administration leaks. He engaged in "incidental collection" of many journalist's communications. "Incidental collection" has come be mean "accidentally on purpose" in recent years. He also went remarkably out of his way, as often as possible, during the presidential campaign to criticize Trump.

But then I thought of Susan Rice. She shares the love of overthrowing governments with Brennan. Rice and Brennan go back to the Libyan Civil War and the downfall (overthrow) of Gaddafi, and have been tight ever since. But Rice has always been even more political than Brennan. In 1994 during the Rwandan genocide, serving Bill Clinton on the National Security Council (ironically, as the Director of International Organizations and Peacekeeping), she said, "If we use the word 'genocide' and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November election?" It was Clinton's unwillingness to do anything militarily about the genocide that frustrated her most, and it was then she decided that she'd push for military intervention whenever possible. ("I swore to myself that if I ever faced such a crisis again, I would come down on the side of dramatic action, going down in flames if that was required.") That's where she and Brennan meshed in Libya.

She also personally succeeded in stirring up as much tension between the Obama administration and Israel as possible. I won't go so far as to label her Antisemitic, buuuuut it wouldn't be a stretch. Every time Israel didn't bow down to Obama and agree with everything he said, she took that to be straight-up racist. When Netanyahu publicly criticized the Obama administration over the Iran negotiations, Rice had it out with Abe Foxman, the Director of the Anti-Defamation League, saying that, in her view, Netanyahu did everything but use ‘the N-word in describing Obama, when, of course, Netanyahu simply disagreed with Obama on policy. She commented early on in the Trump campaign that Trump's views on Israel were "out of touch with reality."

So the revelation that Susan Rice ordered the unmasking of the Trump campaign/transition officials does not come as a surprise. I still think Brennan was involved, probably by obtaining the necessary warrants that enabled him (them, several thems) to accidentally on purpose to collect incidental collection on Trump, et al.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcochristoph
Top