But both are pushing social causes
One is assisted college funding and health care
And the other assisted childcare and elderly care
One is assisted college funding and health care
And the other assisted childcare and elderly care
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
These Wikileaks emails are really rather brutal. Is CNN covering it? Newp. They spent all morning talking about polls (CNN loves to talk about polls) and how they're accurate and how Donald is delusional. Not a peep on how Terry McCauliff gave $650,000 to the wife of the #2 guy at the FBI who was in charge of the Hillary email investigation just a couple of weeks before Bill and Loretta met on the plane. Not a word on how mainstream media reporters, at least 65 of them, met with the Clinton campaign at two different "off-the-record" events just before Clinton announced her candidacy so they could all get on the same page, literally, with regards to "Framing the HRC message and framing the race." Nothing about how the emails Donna Brazille claims couldn't be trusted because they were "doctored" by the Russians have been proven beyond any doubt to be authentic (the CRC and DKIM keys match the originals on the server).
Windsor
Veteran Expediter
Also many ppl were hoping what was found would have been more juicy.
Yeah, nobody plotted a murder or something, yet.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
I dunno... Saying one thing in public and another in private to special interests is pretty juicy. Having it revealed that she knew exactly what she was doing with the private email server, in direct contrast with her public (and congressional) statements is pretty juicy. Showing a clear 'let them eat cake' disdain for the little people is pretty juicy. The massive Clinton Machine's collusion with a mainstream media that claims to be unbiased is pretty juicy. Put it together and we see the seedy underbelly of Clinton herself and the Clinton Machine that gives us an unfettered view into what her presidency would be like.
Last edited:
And if Trump would just happen to win a close election, how awesome would that be? Just from the standpoint of showing the door to the establishment hacks in both parties and seeing the media along with Hillary's campaign clamor that the election results should be looked at because they can't believe the outcome. It would be a schadenfreudapalooza for Muttly.
Two VERY flawed candidates. Half Truth Hillary personally disgusts me BUT she is qualified to be President. The Donald is NOT! I deeply regret that all the angry Republicans, (I am one), let emotion override common sense. We could have selected one of many qualified candidates and gained all three branches of the government, now we will be lucky to hold the house alone which won't prevent a liberal Supreme Court from changing the lives of our children and grandchildren. Trump Thumpers desire to give the finger to the man will have failed and created repercussions for years to come. My grandchildren will reap what y'all have sown. This is just an observation and opinion of a 66 year old white male who has casted his FIRST ever vote for a Democrat. I respect your opinion and right to vote your conscience and love all my expediting family
Sent from my hand-held Etch-A- Sketch
Sent from my hand-held Etch-A- Sketch
I guess it depends on how you define "qualified." They are both equally qualified to be president according to the Constitution.
Hillary has a 30 year record of knee-jerk tendencies toward Nixonian cover-ups, secrecy and only admitting to the truth when the truth is finally out there and she has no choice. She has demonstrated a complete lack of respect and utter disdain for the little people she espouses to represent. Many people are worried that if elected she will continue Obama's legacy, but in order to do that she needs to be competent. She's not. Her one major initiative in American political life, Hillarycare, failed in epic proportions. She failed utterly as a Senator, her only accomplishments being the renaming of a couple of post offices. She’s so incompetent that Obama finally took State Department policy out of her hands when she was Secretary of State, delegating it to various outsiders, including John Kerry. She’s so incompetent that even with the DNC and the media working her, she still almost lost in the primaries to a loonbag socialist.
Trump is hardly perfect, but at least he has a record of successes that far outweigh his failures. His radical, wild and crazy ideas like a sound immigration policy, returning manufacturing jobs to America, and negotiating better trade deals, are not all that radical, wild, or crazy, but they absolutely go against the Washington status-quo. Hillary won't fix the problem, because she is part and parcel of the problem.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If you want the same thing over and over, Hillary's your man, because on that score she is imminently qualified. If you want someone who will upset the apple cart and give you a different result, you gotta go with somebody different.
Since you made this point, here's an essay that expands on it and appears to hit the heart of this subject matter. Unless and until our public education system is improved and businesses are allowed to grow unencumbered by big govt the status quo will continue.
Going with Hillary is the equivalent of having Casey Anthony run a day care.
I think if Hillary gets elected within the first six months you will hear "Wow she is worse than Obama and Carter".
Think there is buyer remorse with Obama, just wait on the next round.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Sounds good ... until you look at Bamz' approval rating (55% last I saw a couple days ago) ... and Congress' approval rating (13% ?) ...
Remind me again ... which party is it that controls Congress ?
Remember the above on November 9th when you try to discern what happened.