An historical account, a history book.Some of my problems are when to use 'than and then', 'to and too' and 'affect and effect'.
Most here try to check our usage and me personally don't mind the correction if it is done with an explanation. Which reminds me 'a and an' is another issue for me.
For "a" or "an', for the most part, if it sounds right it probably is right. A while back I saw someone post something about "an Freightliner". How in the world do you do that and not realize that it sounds stupid?
Just to hijack the thread momentarily. Does anyone know the differance between a Freightliner and a Jehovah's Witness ?
Let's not forget the most common error seen in today's grammar: the inability to differentiate between plural and possessive, using an apostrophe to indicate plural - this drives me nuts I was in a restaurant the other night, and on the chalk board next to the entrance the had listed three "Nightly Special's" plus the "Soup's of the Day". No doubt this was written by some recent college graduate that hasn't yet found a job in their chosen field.And while we're at it, can we all learn the difference between YOUR and YOU'RE? If we can just get those few things down, I can live with other errors, even RESTARAUNT and BUISNESS and THIER. Oh, yeah, one more: it's ETC., not ECT. Let's nail that one down, too. Heck, I can even learn to put up with mixing TO and TOO if we can agree on loose/lose, your/you're, and etc/ect.
Let's not forget the most common error seen in today's grammar: the inability to differentiate between plural and possessive, using an apostrophe to indicate plural - this drives me nuts I was in a restaurant the other night, and on the chalk board next to the entrance the had listed three "Nightly Special's" plus the "Soup's of the Day". No doubt this was written by some recent college graduate that hasn't yet found a job in their chosen field.
Let's not forget the most common error seen in today's grammar: the inability to differentiate between plural and possessive, using an apostrophe to indicate plural . . .
Is it octopi or octopus's?
Does it really work, though? Would you speak to someone who you wanted to hear and understand you in unintelligible mumblings? You might not speak the language perfectly, but you still want to be understood, to convey to the listener your thoughts. The same holds true for the written word. If no one can understand it or it takes too much effort to decipher it, your thoughts will fall on deaf eyes.I've got an even better idea. How about I/we type it and you have a choice... read it or don't read it. That works for me.