Sorry, can't take it any more

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Or if it begins with a vowel SOUND. As in, "My insurance guy recommends I join an HMO." HMO begins with aych, which is a vowel sound.



--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Some of my problems are when to use 'than and then', 'to and too' and 'affect and effect'.

Most here try to check our usage and me personally don't mind the correction if it is done with an explanation. Which reminds me 'a and an' is another issue for me.
An historical account, a history book. :D

Easiest way to remember "to versus too" is "too" has an extra "o". I know that sounds obvious and perhaps silly, but the word "too' itself means an "extra" or "excessive amount" of something. So, if you're talking about an extra amount, add an extra "o". :D

"Affect and effect" can be confusing, but basically affect is 'to have an influence on or cause a change in,' and effect is more or less a 'past tense result'. Affect is a verb, an action word, while effect is a noun, something real or tangible. Low rates affect (have an influence on) expediters, and the effect (result) is many of them go bankrupt.
 

highway star

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
For "a" or "an', for the most part, if it sounds right it probably is right. A while back I saw someone post something about "an Freightliner". How in the world do you do that and not realize that it sounds stupid?
 

zorry

Veteran Expediter
Just to hijack the thread momentarily. Does anyone know the differance between a Freightliner and a Jehovah's Witness ?
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Just to hijack the thread momentarily. Does anyone know the differance between a Freightliner and a Jehovah's Witness ?


No, but I know what a differEnce one letter can make....:D

I get frustrated by the really sloppy writing [compounded by lack of any proofreading at all] as much as anyone, and maybe more than some, as a recent query regarding whether a poster was describing freight or a record of burglary convictions [it wasn't clear to me at all, lol] attests. I'd like to see the worst offenses against spelling, punctuation, and grammar cleaned up - but I would hate to see the unique 'voices' made homogenous, because they're interesting.
And they're a dead giveaway when someone pretends to be other than who they really are.....:D
 

zorry

Veteran Expediter
The differEnce between a Freightliner and a Jehovah's Witness is : you can close the door on a Jehovah's Witness.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
And while we're at it, can we all learn the difference between YOUR and YOU'RE? If we can just get those few things down, I can live with other errors, even RESTARAUNT and BUISNESS and THIER. Oh, yeah, one more: it's ETC., not ECT. Let's nail that one down, too. Heck, I can even learn to put up with mixing TO and TOO if we can agree on loose/lose, your/you're, and etc/ect.
Let's not forget the most common error seen in today's grammar: the inability to differentiate between plural and possessive, using an apostrophe to indicate plural - this drives me nuts :mad: I was in a restaurant the other night, and on the chalk board next to the entrance the had listed three "Nightly Special's" plus the "Soup's of the Day". No doubt this was written by some recent college graduate that hasn't yet found a job in their chosen field.
 

jansiemoo

Seasoned Expediter
Let's not forget the most common error seen in today's grammar: the inability to differentiate between plural and possessive, using an apostrophe to indicate plural - this drives me nuts :mad: I was in a restaurant the other night, and on the chalk board next to the entrance the had listed three "Nightly Special's" plus the "Soup's of the Day". No doubt this was written by some recent college graduate that hasn't yet found a job in their chosen field.

There's a CVS at home that has "print your facebook photo's here".
I'm about to go complain to the mgr, but I realized- in their defense- if the apostrophe is replacing 'graph' in 'photographs', it's technically correct. I know in my gut, though, that it's just idiots placing apostrophes before 's'.

The Oatmeal has a nice collection of grammar comics:
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apostrophe
 

Attachments

  • ImageUploadedByEO Forums1327182939.780281.jpg
    ImageUploadedByEO Forums1327182939.780281.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Let's not forget the most common error seen in today's grammar: the inability to differentiate between plural and possessive, using an apostrophe to indicate plural . . .


Is it octopi or octopus's?
:confused:
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Now i've got that song stuck in my head! :p


octogarden.jpg
 

Rocketman

Veteran Expediter
I've got an even better idea. How about I/we type it and you have a choice... read it or don't read it. That works for me.
 

pelicn

Veteran Expediter
My excuse for spelling? I'm a dyslexic typer.... and from my software typer isn't a word. I type dyslexically? Nope...that isn't right either...
Ok, well crap, neither is OK according to my spell check/grammar check thingy.....Oohhh...thingy is a word but oohhh isn't. Go figure.
I think I'll give up because you're not going to read this anyway unless it's your day to be bored...LOL
 

mjmsprt40

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
I have spell-check as part of the browser I use, so outright mis-spelled words get red-lined right away. However, it won't catch words that are spelled correctly in themselves, but are not correct in the sentence they're in. "Too", "to" and "two" are prime examples of this. If I write "There are two many people groaning about mis-spelled words", Spell Check will not catch that. Maybe it assumes only two people are unhappy about mis-spelled words so it doesn't bother about them--- your guess is as good as mine.

I could do with a checker that catches those types of errors, but until then I guess we make do with what we have.
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Whenever someone blames the mistakes on being a fast typist, I think the problem is more likely that they're a half fast typist. ;)
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
I've got an even better idea. How about I/we type it and you have a choice... read it or don't read it. That works for me.
Does it really work, though? Would you speak to someone who you wanted to hear and understand you in unintelligible mumblings? You might not speak the language perfectly, but you still want to be understood, to convey to the listener your thoughts. The same holds true for the written word. If no one can understand it or it takes too much effort to decipher it, your thoughts will fall on deaf eyes.

On the other hand, if your goal is to mumble for the sake of mumbling, and don't care if you are understood, then intelligible is irrelevant. :D
 
Top