The subject of carrier logos and other signage on trucks is a topic that arises in the forum about every year. All trucks regulated by the USDOT that are engaged in interstate commerce are required, at a minimum, to display Carrier Name, Carrier City and DOT number. In expediting, these signs are required for C, D and E trucks and are usually afixed to the cab doors or sleeper sides. Cargo van owners, not regulated by the USDOT, may be required to display the minimum signage because of the terms of their lease agreement with their chosen carrier, which they voluntarily sign.
Those of us that are leased to an expedite carrier may have terms of our lease that include larger signs on the box. Some carriers pay extra for the owner to display the large signs, some do not. In either event, we agree to display or not display the large signs when we sign the lease with a carrier. There is no mystery here, no underhanded move by carriers to have us advertise for them.
So why then, do so many folks object to displaying their carrier's logo? Advertising pays and, by virtue of our display of our carrier's logo, we help in some small way to promote business for them that brings business to us. If the choice was mine, I'd require any owner wishing to lease to my carrier to display their logos.
Can anyone possibly think that the multi-million dollar cost of branding FedEx, UPS, Schneider, Panther, et al does not pay dividends? My carrier pays its owners 1/2 percent of gross revenue to display large signs; we pay for the signs and get a return on our investment. It's a win-win situation for all concerned.
Those of us that are leased to an expedite carrier may have terms of our lease that include larger signs on the box. Some carriers pay extra for the owner to display the large signs, some do not. In either event, we agree to display or not display the large signs when we sign the lease with a carrier. There is no mystery here, no underhanded move by carriers to have us advertise for them.
So why then, do so many folks object to displaying their carrier's logo? Advertising pays and, by virtue of our display of our carrier's logo, we help in some small way to promote business for them that brings business to us. If the choice was mine, I'd require any owner wishing to lease to my carrier to display their logos.
Can anyone possibly think that the multi-million dollar cost of branding FedEx, UPS, Schneider, Panther, et al does not pay dividends? My carrier pays its owners 1/2 percent of gross revenue to display large signs; we pay for the signs and get a return on our investment. It's a win-win situation for all concerned.