Linda,
I tried several times to post a reply comment to your October 31 blog entry (Title: "Disheartened") but it would not take. Since it is an especially important topic you raise, I am posting my reply here.
My comment:
Diane and I left FedEx Custom Critical in June, not for perceived greener pastures (your metaphor) but for the real thing. Four months later we can report that the pastures are in fact greener.
Three trucks that we know preceded us in the same move by a year or less. Four trucks that we know made the move after we did. There are others but I can't talk about them because we do not know them.
That makes eight trucks including us (six teams, two solo). None of them have gone back and none are even thinking about it.
These people are not newbies trying to find their way in the industry. The least experienced truck has six years with their former carrier. From there, experience levels go as high as 15 years or more.
Like you, they have their business plans.
Like you, their relationship with FedEx Custom Critical mattered a great deal.
Like you, they enjoyed -- and continue to enjoy -- the fun and adventures of expediting.
Some of them, like you, served on the council that you now chair.
Like you, they have been reacting to company changes the whole time they were there.
Like you, all but one of them did high-value white-glove loads.
Like you, they know what loads are profitable and what freight areas are good.
Like you, some of them won trips to the Four Star banquets.
Like you, they saw and continue to see the 48 states in all the seasons.
Like you, they enjoyed tourist attractions and took time off at will to go home when needed or desired.
Like you, they met company management and endeavored to understand the company philosophy.
Like you, they stepped back to re-evaluate their situations and needs.
Unlike you, they chose to change carriers.
You are absolutely correct when you say, "... not one company fits everyone and something that does not bother us can drive another to find a different company." But please be careful about minimizing the difficult and deeply-thought-out carrier change decisions made by others.
These folks are no less of an expediter or business person than you are. They did not leave company because of "perceived" greener pastures. They made the difficult decision to leave their carrier of many years because they felt the real need for a real change. None of them say they made the change because their new carrier got better. All of them say they made the change because their former carrier got worse.
These folks don't speak about moving to greener pastures. They speak about having made a carrier change that they wish they would not have had to make. They don't describe their move with vague terms ("greener pastures") but instead cite very specific data and reasons for making the move.
You re-evaluated your situation and chose to stay. These seasoned and successful expediters re-evaluated their situation and chose to leave. Both decisions are equally valid. Both decisions should be equally respected.
I tried several times to post a reply comment to your October 31 blog entry (Title: "Disheartened") but it would not take. Since it is an especially important topic you raise, I am posting my reply here.
My comment:
Diane and I left FedEx Custom Critical in June, not for perceived greener pastures (your metaphor) but for the real thing. Four months later we can report that the pastures are in fact greener.
Three trucks that we know preceded us in the same move by a year or less. Four trucks that we know made the move after we did. There are others but I can't talk about them because we do not know them.
That makes eight trucks including us (six teams, two solo). None of them have gone back and none are even thinking about it.
These people are not newbies trying to find their way in the industry. The least experienced truck has six years with their former carrier. From there, experience levels go as high as 15 years or more.
Like you, they have their business plans.
Like you, their relationship with FedEx Custom Critical mattered a great deal.
Like you, they enjoyed -- and continue to enjoy -- the fun and adventures of expediting.
Some of them, like you, served on the council that you now chair.
Like you, they have been reacting to company changes the whole time they were there.
Like you, all but one of them did high-value white-glove loads.
Like you, they know what loads are profitable and what freight areas are good.
Like you, some of them won trips to the Four Star banquets.
Like you, they saw and continue to see the 48 states in all the seasons.
Like you, they enjoyed tourist attractions and took time off at will to go home when needed or desired.
Like you, they met company management and endeavored to understand the company philosophy.
Like you, they stepped back to re-evaluate their situations and needs.
Unlike you, they chose to change carriers.
You are absolutely correct when you say, "... not one company fits everyone and something that does not bother us can drive another to find a different company." But please be careful about minimizing the difficult and deeply-thought-out carrier change decisions made by others.
These folks are no less of an expediter or business person than you are. They did not leave company because of "perceived" greener pastures. They made the difficult decision to leave their carrier of many years because they felt the real need for a real change. None of them say they made the change because their new carrier got better. All of them say they made the change because their former carrier got worse.
These folks don't speak about moving to greener pastures. They speak about having made a carrier change that they wish they would not have had to make. They don't describe their move with vague terms ("greener pastures") but instead cite very specific data and reasons for making the move.
You re-evaluated your situation and chose to stay. These seasoned and successful expediters re-evaluated their situation and chose to leave. Both decisions are equally valid. Both decisions should be equally respected.
Last edited: